220 likes | 334 Views
Text. Data. Simulated data AMSREA, MODIS A-T Cross-validation approach Full fields as input data and truth 15 day sliding data window Remove 3 or 5 days of data Calculate error for middle day. 2-D Bi-cubic Smoothing Spline. Inoue (1986): tension parameter, roughness parameter
E N D
Data • Simulated data • AMSREA, MODIS A-T • Cross-validation approach • Full fields as input data and truth • 15 day sliding data window • Remove 3 or 5 days of data • Calculate error for middle day
2-D Bi-cubic Smoothing Spline • Inoue (1986): tension parameter, roughness parameter • Tense splines (> 0.9) because of extrapolation • Very smooth splines can’t interpolate over large gaps • Interpolating splines whiten residuals & overfitting • .1 < rho (roughness parameter) < 1.0
Influential Data Points (IDP): • O(1,000,000) data pts to O(10) IDP at each OA location • Computationally intensive part of OA code • IDP should be the data most correlated with OA location • PMOA algorithm was designed to efficiently find IDP • New algorithm is finding IDP in local polar coordinates • Goal: Find IDP most correlated that surround OA location • reduce bias
Optical flow method • DT/dt=0 δT/δt=-(uδT/δx + vδT/δy) • Trend Field is used for input • Moore-Penrose Inverse Solution • Time derivative calculated with δt=2 days • Spatial derivatives weighted (1/4,1/2,1/4) • FDVs outliers are removed (large & near-zero) • Spline smoothing of FDV estimates
Cross-validation error estimates:Remove 3 input days of data insliding 15 day data windowCalculate estimation error for the middle day for 3 months FDV-based estimates were 10%better, RMS of .51 vs .56
Future Work • Tune some parameters • Influential Data Point Selection • Estimation variance vs resolution/bias • Merge FDV with MUR: FDV(scale)