Download
1 / 33
330 likes | 340 Views
Explore alternative approaches to teaching economics with a focus on heterodox theories, challenging mainstream macroeconomics. Join the discussion at Eduard Heimann Colloquium on May 11, 2017, at Universität Hamburg.
E N D
Problem based learning • A non-mainstream way to teach economics • Eduard-Heimann-Colloquium • Universität Hamburg, 11th of May 2017 • Mogens Ove Madsen • Aalborg University
Who am I? • Mogens Ove Madsen • Associate Professor • Department of Business and Management • Aalborg University • MAMTEP-Group • Head of the Board of Studies • Chairman, Council of the Academy
Agenda • Economics as Partioned Bureaucracy • Mainstream Macroeconomics • The Post-Keynesian approach • Strategies for teaching economics • The Aalborg Approach • Curriculum • PBL - Problem Based Learning • A summary
Richard Whitley: Economics as Partioned Bureaucracy • Economics is extremely unusual in academia in that it combines the high technical task uncertainty of the social sciences, with very low strategic task uncertainty • Whitley states that this mix should be highly unstable unless the central core of conceptual orthodoxy pure/abstract theorizing is partitioned away from empirical sources of uncertainty (applied research) – and it normally is, which is our challenge • Sociology and Management Studies (Polycentric adhocracy) • are more easy to handle from the point of view of PBL • (R. Whitley: The Intellectual and Social Organisation of the Sciences (Oxford University Press 1984, 2000, p.181)
Colander (2009) The making of a European Economist, p. 48: • … economists conduct research in a vacuum – either without reference to real phenomena at all, or using som empirical regularity (at best) to motivate research that extends our knowledge in a relatively small way but can not be refuted/confirmed… • The practical tools with which economiest can have a real effect are somewhat limited and the relationsship between the tools and outcomes is not clearly understood
Mainstream macroeconomics • A uniform approach: • With a theoretical understanding given by the New Neoclassical Synthesis you have to use a DSGE approach • What a student meets with a mainstream and what our students don’t accept: • That there is no other game in town!
International Student Initiative for Pluralism in Economics • Argentina - Australia - Austria - Belgium - Brazil - Canada - Chile - Colombia - Czech Republic - Denmark - France - Germany - India - Israel - Italy - Mexico - Netherlands - Nicaragua - Pakistan - Peru - Poland - Portugal - Russia - Slovenia - Spain - Sweden - Switzerland -Turkey -UK - Uruguay- USA • Our mission is to diversify, demystify, and reinvigorate economics. We believe strongly in a pluralist, open, interdisciplinary economics for the 21st century. We organise as horizontal network and welcome new ideas and new groups or individuals to join in the rethinking.
Mainstream macroeconomics • With recent events in mind – the crisis from 2008 and onwards – critical students of economics ask: • Has modern mainstream macroeconomic theory totally lost touch with reality? • Do economics departments in general teach economics the right way? • What about non-mainstream economic arguments? • – in general, no room for such an understanding
Mainstream macroeconomics • Could you rely on viewing macroeconomics as a mechanistic stable system with a unique intertemporal equilibrium path? • What about endogenous disturbances and crises? • Would students of economics continue to accept such an uniform approach to macroeconomic phenomena of modern society? • If things have to change, students have to demand changes in the curriculum – they have to demand more pluralism when they study economics
Some of it could be a P-K approach • To a Post Keynesian, the macroeconomic system is one of openness • To study macroeconomics, you have to accept that the system is one of non-repetitiveness • Macroeconomics can be characterised by path dependencies • You have to accept the crucial role of uncertainty – epistemologically as well as ontologically • And then of course, money is never neutral – not in the short run nor in the longer run
The P-K approach • As such: • Doing macroeconomics, you always have to have an eye on the demand side as well as on the supply side of the economy • From history we know with certainty, that the macroeconomic outcome is not in general one of optimality • And economic theory, to gain relevance, should somehow always depict phenomena of real life • To a Post Keynesian, the New Neoclassical Synthesis is too permeated with an exclusive focus on equilibrium analysis
What to do? • Three strategies for teaching heterodoxy: • 1. Introduce elements of heterodoxy in orthodox modules or courses • 2. Teaching orthodox and heterodox economics in parallel • 3. Create an entire alternative course of heterodox therories • Mearman (2007), Lavoie (2013) • “Heterodox economists are caught between the devil and the deep blue sea” • (Lavoie, 2015: Should heterodox economics be taught in economics departments or is there any room for backwater economics)
What are we doing: The Aalborg approach • As such, in Aalborg we try to learn students more about macroeconomics than just the story told by the mainstreamers. We have done it since 1974. • We also try to learn students to be critical – our aim is to develop reflective students with an awareness of their methods, methodologies and the economic environment within which they act a practitioners • In doing this we use a different teaching method than that used by more mainstream-type economics departments: • We use the problem-based learning approach (the PBL approach)
The PBL approach: key-elements • Problem orientation: • Problem-oriented education is based on working with unsolved, relevant and current problems of modern society. • By analyzing the problems in depth the students learn and use the disciplines and theories which are considered to be necessary to solve the problems posed, i.e. the problem defines the subjects and not the reverse.
The PBL approach: key-elements • As such: • In their daily study work, project groups themselves have to agree on and choose to analyse a given problem within the subject area and decide how to organize their work. • Besides this, the idea is that students should use their supervisors as a resource together with other resources, such as libraries, internet, courses, and so on. • In principle, the students are responsible for their own process of learning and must negotiate with one other to identify what to learn and how to solve problems that might arise during the process of work.
The PBL approach: key-elements • In this way, the Aalborg approach to the PBL approach is primarily a combination of a problem-based and a project-organized approach. • In problem-based projects, it is very important that the students themselves generate new knowledge in the process of joint cooperation. • This manifests itself in the distribution of ECTS respectively between courses and group work. Within a typical five year master's program, courses generally contribute up to 63% of the total 300 ECTS points. However, 17% of these ECTS points may be acquired through the attendance of another university or from an internship in a company, an institution or at various ministerial departments. Project work (which is predominantly group work) typically accounts for as much as 37% of the total ECTS requirement.
PBL – a different way learning • We have made a clear choicebetween to differentways of learning: • Teacher centeredexercises: demonstrate, practice and correct • or • + Problem-confrontation, - understanding and –solving: the problem defines the subjects and not hereverse
The PBL approach: key-elements • Project organization: • Organizing problem-oriented education as project work allows groups of students to choose problems and work with them, learning from each other. It is a team-based approach that ensures a great variety of approaches and perspectives, which results in a sound and thoroughly prepared project. • Group work means that students have to make compromises during the process. As such, they learn a lot about how to cooperate in practice. This also means that the students will be able to solve larger and more complex problems than if they were studying on an individual basis.
The PBL approach: key-elements • Integration of theory and practice: • Students are able to see how different theories and empirical/practical knowledge interrelate - an aptitude which many European students strive towards, see for instance Collander (2009:31). • This is facilitated by a thematic framework, a given curriculum and with the use of supervisors. • The Curriculum:
The PBL approach: key-elements • The courses represent an introduction to the key elements of macroeconomics, micro-economics, mathematics, econometrics, and more. • It should be emphasized that elective subjects comprise 20% of the total available working time, which allows students the opportunity to develop cross-disciplinary knowledge and skills if they desire to. The supply of these electives is partially determined through discussions with the students, where students can request a class with a particular focus. Some of this working time can also consist of additional project work. • Students can also influence the construction of courses indirectly through a lack of interest, as elective courses will not continue in the absence of active student participation.
The PBL approach: key-elements • Participant direction: • The Aalborg Model is a learning system which has collaborative democratic elements built into the model. • Participant direction means, that it is the participant that directs their own learning. This takes place within a framework; is directed by a given curriculum, which is determined by a study board. • All tertiary educations in economics in Denmark are governed by the same decree, but the study boards of the individual universities have a certain degree of autonomy when they decide on the contents of the various programs that will be implemented in practice. That the decree provides some autonomy is particularly favourable for the implementation of, and opportunity to practice the PBL approach. • Exposed to the same censors and accreditation institution
The PBL approach: key-elements • Basically, there is freedom of choice when it comes to choosing project topics, which of course places extra demands on teachers as supervisors. • Overall, this means that the students have extensive influence over the actual content of their education – in a way, Humboldtian at its best. • This also means that students in the course of the total study can, to a large degree, tailor their study strategy towards specific themes that culminate in a final thesis (BA as well as MA theses).
The PBL approach: key-elements • The project work has its strength in that students are jointly problem-oriented and thus formulate relatively precise problem statements. • It also involves the question of inter-disciplinarity. The university’s PBL approach has developed a separate cross-disciplinary approach (Politics, sociology etc. ) • Interdisciplinarity occurs because many problems from reality can best be captured by an inter-disciplinary approach, e.g. matters of economic policy. Therefore, a number of subjects and courses are presented as vital tools and as possible bids towards solving problems. In parallel, this can be supplemented by a doctrine focused historical presentation of basic theories.
The PBL approach: key-elements • It is indisputable that project work has laid much emphasis on the integration of theory and empirical work. • Problem orientation is the key that gives rise to this reunification. • Furthermore, problem-orientation ensures that students contextualise various theories within current reality. • This ensures that students are critically aware when covering existing theories, and that they are focused on problems that exist in reality.
The PBL approach: key-elements • A discussion of methods and science is important for the students, and the learning process is far more extensive since students learn much from one another. • This is because students engaged in PBL training have to be able to discuss, evaluate and select theories and methods relevant to their research question. Theories are important, or even indispensable, but theories and methods are tools for problem solving and thus the means to achieve a goal which is to make a complete analysis of a given issue. • Traditional teaching is primarily tailored to the learning of a broad scope of knowledge in one or more subject areas. Project work differs in that it is rather characterized by a more in-depth and detailed knowledge of a specific problem area, along with an understanding or insight into the underlying contexts of problems.
Methodology • A discussion of methods and science is important for the students from the first day, and the learning process is far more extensive since students learn much from one another. • An important matter is to distinguish between a written project method and methodology in general. • All this means that we have pluralism in methods, schools of thought and different disciplines
Supervisors • The role of the supervisor is one most often held by a faculty member serving as a resource for groups of students engaged in project work. • Each student group has one or more supervisors for a project. • Supervisor-group relationships do not extend beyond the duration of the project. That is, a student (or group of students) does not have a formal multi-term or multi-year relationship with one particular supervisor. • To be supervisor is an extremely demanding job
The PBL approach and Aalborg University Among the Danish universities, Aalborg University performs the best in terms of the proportion of students to successfully complete their degrees within the stipulated time frames.
The PBL approach and Aalborg University This performance can directly be attributed to the extremely effective study method of the PBL approach.
The PBL approach and Aalborg University • To sum up: • We try to teach in such a way that makes our students become young economists who are able to do relevant economic analyses of real life problems, often with an eye on the necessity for an interdisciplinary approach. • At the same time, we always encourage students to reflect critically on the results of their economic analyses – this is also included as a ‘must’ in the PBL approach. • Fortunately, our graduates generally have no problem in finding a job when they leave the university – it seems as though the demand for hiring well-educated, critically minded young economists is presently adequate in real life.
The PBL approach and Aalborg University • We hope that the way we teach economics at Aalborg University could be an inspiration for others • mom@business.aau.dk • Thanks very much for your attention
