1 / 11

Sedimentology, Resource Conservation Methods and Environmental Policy of Irrigated Row Crop Agriculture in the Salinas V

Sedimentology, Resource Conservation Methods and Environmental Policy of Irrigated Row Crop Agriculture in the Salinas Valley, CA. Don Kozlowski May 2001. Background. 1972, Clean Water Act, Sect. 303(d) list & fix pollution via TMDL Salinas River listed as impacted by sediment

alma
Download Presentation

Sedimentology, Resource Conservation Methods and Environmental Policy of Irrigated Row Crop Agriculture in the Salinas V

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sedimentology, Resource Conservation Methods and Environmental Policy of Irrigated Row Crop Agriculture in the Salinas Valley, CA Don Kozlowski May 2001

  2. Background • 1972, Clean Water Act, Sect. 303(d) • list & fix pollution via TMDL • Salinas River listed as impacted by • sediment • Beneficial uses & the Endangered • Species Act • 2001, still no TMDL for the Salinas • Salinas Sediment Study hired by • state for technical assistance

  3. Possible Sources • Natural processes • Recreational use • Mining • Urban/suburban • Grazing • Viticulture • Agriculture • 15% of area is row crop agriculture (165,000 ha) • 40% sediment of U.S. rivers from cultivated land • ag’s contribution to the Salinas River?

  4. Objectives Determine: • Typical sediment yields from row crop ag fieldsdue to irrigation and storm events during a season • Efficiency of a particular best management practice, the water/sediment detention basin

  5. Methods Site selection Catchment construction Filtration Recording and analysis

  6. Methods (cont’) • Create model that predicts field erosion • Determined from various event parameters • Upscale the field data to watershed scale • GIS model to get area & slope • Rainfall model • For detention basins • Compare sediment into basin to sediment out

  7. Results (15 events monitored: 9 irrigation, 6 rainfall) Erosion Analysis (example):

  8. Results (cont’) Erosion Model:

  9. Watershed Scale Erosion Estimates: Rainfall: 93 kilo-tonnes, 1.2 tonnes/ha Irrigation: 141 kilo-tonnes, 1.7 tonnes/ha Total: 234 kilo-tonnes, 2.9 tonnes/ha 60% of agricultural row cropland, slopes <2.3% Only a fraction of this made it to the Salinas River Still More Results CAUTION!! • Efficiency of Detention Basin • 100% for sand, at least 99% for silt/clay • 211mg/L max outgoing; 46,400 mg/L max incoming

  10. Discussion/Wrap-up • Agricultural land use produces a lot of erosion • Many BMP’s are in place • Detention basins appear to work well • Improvements: • Storm erosion dynamics, need more data • Slopes > 2%, need data • Rain model

  11. Acknowledgements • Farmers • SSS team (Thor, Wendi, Adrian, Alana, Bronwyn, Joel, Julie) • Mark Angelo, RWQCB • Bryan Largay, Monterey Co. RCD • NASA/EPA • Dr. Sharon Anderson • Dr. Lars Pierce • Dr. Fred Watson

More Related