280 likes | 849 Views
STEMI. Specific type of heart attackAny coronary artery that becomes 100% blockedDistal part of heart muscle receives NO oxygenHeart muscle dies. Coronary Artery. Dead Heart Muscle. . Myocardial Infarction. Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).
E N D
1. CODE STEMI
Presented by: P. Barber, J. Bautista,
S. Fenley, and A. Hill
Faculty: Lisa Lee and Donna Fesler
College of Nursing
University of Oklahoma
EBP Symposium
April 21, 2011
2. STEMI Specific type of heart attack
Any coronary artery that becomes 100% blocked
Distal part of heart muscle receives NO oxygen
Heart muscle dies
3. Myocardial Infarction Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)
ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
4. Identifying a STEMI
Cardiac Markers
?Troponin, ?CPK
12-Lead Electrocardiogram
5. Identifying a STEMI
6. Identifying the Problem STEMI is the most deadly form of a heart attack
No in-patient code STEMI protocol
Longer hospital stay
Delay in reperfusion
Higher mortality rates
7. PICO QUESTION
Does implementing an inpatient code STEMI protocol, among hospitalized patients 18 years of age and older, versus not having an inpatient STEMI protocol, improve patient mortality?
8. Statistics
400,000 people experience a STEMI
30% do not receive timely reperfusion
70% are not eligible for fibrinolytics
and do not receive PCI
(American Heart Association, 2011)
9. Current Practice ED Inpatient Literature review
NO published evidence of a STEMI protocol AHA guidelines
Most hospitals have adopted and many fail to meet door to balloon time within 90 minutes
10. Review of Literature
No published evidence-based practice literature exists on STEMI protocols designed for inpatients, with other morbidities, that develop a STEMI while hospitalized
11. Review of Literature Registered nurse review of several studies
Identified strategies to reduce door-to-balloon time (DTBT )
Delays increased hospital mortality rate
regardless of time delay between onset of symptoms and arrival at facility
(Farwell, 2010)
12. Review of Literature
2009 ACC/AHA Guidelines: Updates to current guidelines are of expert opinion based off evidence
(Kushner et al., 2009)
13. Review of Literature
DTBT of <90 minutes achieved in 70 out of 72 patients
Sixty-five of the 72 patients survived to hospital discharge
(Levis et al., 2010)
14. Review of Literature National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)
29,222 STEMI patients from 395 hospitals
DTBT vs. in-hospital deaths
Increasing mortality was seen
Degree of urgency should not depend on risk factors
(McNamara et al., 2006)
15. Review of Literature Study performed at an urban teaching hospital
Achieved decreased DTBT of 90 minutes or less
Applied strategies
in-house initiative
comply with AHA STEMI guidelines
Unique study
largest urban teaching hospital
feasibility of reducing DTBT (Parikh et al., 2009)
16. Review of Literature 2005-2006 data from American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry
Final study sample of 43,801 patients
Time to PCI was measured in 15 minute increments
Longer door-to-balloon times had an increase in mortality rates
Suggests an “as soon as possible” approach (Rathore et al., 2009)
17. Review of Literature
Follow-up study based on Danish medical registries
Three high-volume PCI centers in Western Denmark
6,209 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI
System delay associated with mortality
(Terkelsen et al., 2010)
18. Review of Literature
Mayo Clinic implemented STEMI protocol in 2004
Compared pre-protocol and post-protocol DTBT
DTBT 90 minutes vs. 71 minutes
? treatment times = ? morality rates
(Ting et al., 2007)
19. Benefits of STEMI Protocol Decreased morbidity and mortality
Incorporates EBP into clinical practice
Efficient interdisciplinary performance
Nationwide, organized approach
No more communication gaps
Increased readiness
20. Barriers to Implementation Resistance to change
Various interests
Challenges
Education
21. Recommended Interventions
Achieve DTBT within 90 minutes recommendation
Implement hospital-wide STEMI protocol
Conduct retrospective case studies to evaluate outcomes
4. Educate ALL staff regarding early interventions
5. Join a national registry
22. Evaluation Quality improvement processes to analyze data
Chart review of inpatient STEMI for reperfusion times
Compare reperfusion time and mortality rate variables
Pre /post tests with online education, annual competencies
5. Report cases to data registry and receive feedback regarding improvement
23. Suggestions for Further Study Actual number of inpatient STEMIs
Recognition of initial symptoms
Inpatient STEMI protocol
Mortality rates
PCI reperfusion times
24. Any Questions?
25. References American Heart Association. (2011). Mission: Lifeline. Retrieved from http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/HealthcareProfessional/
Mission-Lifeline-Home-Page_UCM_305495_SubHomePage.jsp
Farwell, A.L. (2010). Saving muscle: Evidence-based strategies for reducing door-to-balloon-times for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 36(3), 231-37.
Kushner, F.G., Hand, M., Smith, S.C., King, S. B., Anderson, J.L., Antman, E.M.,… Williams, D.O. (2009). 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention. (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update). A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association. doi:10.11.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192663
26. References Levis, J.T., Mercer, M.P., Thanassi, M., and Lin, J. (2010). Factors
contributing to door-to-balloon times of < 90 minutes in 97% of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: our one-year experience with a heart alert protocol. The Permanente Journal, 14(3), 1-11.
McNamara, R.L., Wang, Y., Herrin, J., Curtis, J.P., Bradley, E.H., Magid, D.J., … Krumholz, H.M. (2006). Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 47(11), 2180-6. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.072
Parikh, S.V., Treichler, D.B., DePaola, S., Sharps, J., Valdes, M., Addo, T., … Das, S.R. (2009). Systems-based improvement in door-to-balloon times at a large urban teaching hospital: A follow-up study from parkland health and hospital system. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, 2(2), 116-22. doi:10.1161.CIRCOUTCOMES.108.820134
27. References Rathore, S.S., Curtis, J.P., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Nallamothu, B.K., Epstein, A.J., … Harold, H.H. (2009). Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study. British Medical Journal, 338:b1807, 1-7. doi:10.1136/bmj.b1807
Terkelsen, C.J., Sorensen, J.T., Maeng, M., Jensen, L.O., Tilsted, H.H., Trautner, S., … Lassen, J.F. (2010) System delay and mortality among patients with stemi treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(7), 763-71.
28. References Ting, H.H., Rihal, C.S., Gersh, B.J., Haro, L.H., Bjerke, C.M., Lennon, R.J., … Bell, M.R. (2007). Regional systems of care to optimize timeliness of reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association, 116(7), 729-36. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699934