1 / 24

CS 551/652: Structure of Spoken Language Lecture 2: Spectrogram Reading and Introductory Phonetics John-Paul Hosom Fall

CS 551/652: Structure of Spoken Language Lecture 2: Spectrogram Reading and Introductory Phonetics John-Paul Hosom Fall 2010. Spectrogram Reading Why bother?? What’s the point of spectrogram reading? Do people read spectrograms as part of their job? Do computers “read” spectrograms

alton
Download Presentation

CS 551/652: Structure of Spoken Language Lecture 2: Spectrogram Reading and Introductory Phonetics John-Paul Hosom Fall

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CS 551/652: Structure of Spoken Language Lecture 2: Spectrogram Reading and Introductory Phonetics John-Paul Hosom Fall 2010

  2. Spectrogram Reading • Why bother?? • What’s the point of spectrogram reading? Do people read • spectrograms as part of their job? Do computers “read” spectrograms • in order to recognize speech? • There are some jobs that require spectrogram reading (e.g. phonetic • time alignment), but not many. Automatic speech recognition • systems do not process speech in this way. • Primary reason for spectrogram reading: • If you’re going to work on a problem, it’s advisable to • understand the nature of that problem. Spectrogram reading • provides a direct method for “hands-on” learning of the • characteristics of speech. Studying phonetics, signal processing, • or techniques in speech recognition/speech synthesis does not • fully convey the complexity and structure of spoken language.

  3. More Formant Data… (source unknown)

  4. Phonetics: Introduction Phonology: A description of the systems and patterns of sounds that occur in a language (abstract), often involving comparisons between languages and/or evolution of a language over time. Phonetics: A branch of phonology that deals with individual speech sounds, their production, and their written representation. Phoneme: • A unit of speech that can be used to differentiate words (e.g. “cat” /k ae t/ vs. “bat” /b ae t/).• Phonemes identify minimal pairs in a language. • The set of phonemes in a language subject to interpretation; most languages have 20 to 40 phonemes.

  5. Phonetics: Introduction Allophone: A speech sound constituting one of the systematic phonetic variants of a given phoneme. Different allophones are predictable from environment (e.g. “toe”, “caught”, “fitness”, “writer”; “sill”, “still”, “spill”) Phone: An acoustic realization of a phoneme. (Many different phones may represent the same phoneme.) “The phoneme /s/ consists of more than 100 allophones” − Pickett, The Acoustics of Speech Communication, p. 7. Phonemes indicated by / /; phones (allophones) indicated by [ ].

  6. Phonetics: Introduction Syllable: • Unit of speech containing one or more phonemes. • A vowel in a syllable is called the syllable nucleus. • Most syllables contain one vowel (or diphthong); some contain only a lateral (“bott/le”) or nasal (“butt/on”) as the most intense sound. • Syllable boundaries sometimes ambiguous (“tas/ty” vs. “tast/y” vs. “ta/sty”) Coarticulation: The “blending” of two or more adjacent phones, causing a non-distinct boundary between them. Coarticulation is caused by smooth changes in the articulators (lips, tongue, jaw) over time.

  7. Phonetics: Introduction Coarticulation Example: y uw aa r “you are”: /y uw aa r/

  8. Phonetics: Introduction Another Example of Coarticulation:

  9. Phonetics: Introduction(adapted from Schane, p. 4-6) • Speech signal is continuous; we perceive discrete entities. • (How many sound units are in the word “cat”?) • One assumption of phonology: utterances can be represented as • sequence of discrete units. • Are such units purely an “invention” of linguistics? • Spoonerisms (“belly jeans” vs. “jelly beans”) and rhymes indicate small units of language (Reverend William Archibald Spooner (1844-1930)) • Utterances of the same word(s) have many differences… we’re • usually only interested in those differences that are “linguistically • significant” or that are “perceived as different”. • Implies a somewhat subjective nature to phonology, whereas • we want an objective measure of perceived or produced units.

  10. Phonetics: Distinctive Phonetic Features • Phonemes do not differ randomly from one another; there are relationships among phonemes (e.g. /p/ vs. /t/ vs. /ah/) • A (distinctive) feature is a “phonetic property that can be used to classify sounds” [Ladefoged, p. 42] • Typically, features are associated with aspects of articulation • Features may be binary or multi-valued • Capital letters indicate feature name: Manner square brackets [] indicate feature value: [+fricative]

  11. Phonetics: Distinctive Phonetic Features • • Exact set of features and feature values depends on goals • (no “right” or “wrong” set of features or values) • • Distinctive features provide a vocabulary for describing speech • • Are distinctive features purely an “invention” of linguistics? • memory tasks show that when people forget a phoneme, theyusually remember a phoneme with similar distinctive features

  12. Phonetics: Distinctive Phonetic Features nasal tract (hard) palate velic port oral tract alveolar ridge velum (soft palate) lips tongue teeth pharynx tongue tip glottis(vocal folds and space between vocal cords) vocal folds = vocal cords larynx (voice box) The Speech Production Apparatus(from Olive, p. 23)

  13. Phonetics: Distinctive Phonetic Features* Feature Description _ Consonantal produced with a constriction along center line of oral cavity. Only vowels, /w/, /h/, and /y/ are not. Vocalic largely unobstructed vocal tract. Vowels and liquids (/l/, /r/) are vocalic; glides (/w/, /y/) are not. Anterior point of articulation near alveolar ridge, including all labial and dental sounds. Coronal articulation involves front of tongue Continuant no complete obstruction in oral cavity; only nasals, stops, and affricates are non-continuant Strident articulation with long, narrow constriction; such as /s/, /z/, /f/, /v/, /sh/, /zh/, /ch/, /jh/ Voiced vibration of the vocal folds occurs during articulation

  14. Phonetics: Distinctive Phonetic Features* Feature Description _ Lateral contact between corona of tongue and roof of mouth, with lowering of sides of tongue (only /l/ in English) Nasal lowering of the velic port and opening of nasal cavity. High vowel with high tongue position (narrow constriction); in English, /iy/, /ih/, /uh/, /uw/ Low vowel with low tongue position (no constriction); /ae/, /ao/, /aa/ are (some) low vowels in English. Back vowels produce with tongue toward back of mouth; /uw/, /uh/, /ah/, /ao/, /aa/, /ow/ are back vowels Round articulation involving rounding of the lips; only /uw/, /ow/, /ao/, and /uh/ are rounded in English. However, /uh/ may take an unrounded form. *Adapted from “Language” by C.E.Cairns and F. Williams in Normal Aspects of Speech, Hearing, and Language, edited by Minifie, Hixon, and Williams, 1973, p. 424, as printed in Daniloff p. 51.

  15. Phonetics: More Distinctive Phonetic Features* Feature Description _ Sonorant “resonant quality” of a sound; vowels are +sonorant, stops and fricatives are –sonorant. nasals also sonorant. Obstruent non-sonorants, e.g. stops, fricatives, affricates, which are formed by obstructing the airflow. Syllabic is the phoneme the main sound in a syllable? vowels are syllabic, stops are usually –syllabic, but there are syllabic nasals and liquids. Tense tense vowels are longer, more fully articulated, and more “distinct,” e.g. /iy ey uw ow aa/; lax vowels are less so, e.g. /ih eh uh ah/. Aspirated produced without a constriction in the vocal tract, but also without voicing (/h/). Glottalized produced with aperiodic or extremely low-frequency vibrations of the vocal cords. * from Schane, pp. 26-32

  16. Phonetics: Distinctive Phonetic Features Physiological Features: •Manner stop /p/, fricative /s/, affricate /ch/, liquid /l/ /r/, glide /j/ /w/, nasal /m/, vowel /ah/, aspiration /h/ •Place bilabial /p/, labiodental /f/, dental /th/, alveolar /t/, palato-alveolar /r/, palatal /sh/, velar /k/, glottal /h/, front /iy/, mid /ah/, back /aa/ (can combine mid + back) •Height high /iy/, mid-high /ih/, mid /ax/, mid-low /eh/, low /aa/ or high /iy/, mid /eh/, low /aa/ (3 values, plus tense/lax) •Tenseness, Nasality, Rounding same as previous descriptions

  17. Phonetics: Distinctive Feature Relationships: Vowels * from Schane, pp. 12-13. †/ax/ is slightly more centralized than /ah/, and shorter in duration

  18. Phonetics: Distinctive Phonetic Features: The Case of /ae/ • /ae/ is classified in the preceding table as “lax”, but we have been considering it as “tense”. • One Rule for Differentiating Tense/Lax: • A lax vowel can never be a word-final stressed vowel • e.g. /iy/ can be word final: “be” /b iy/, “tea” /t iy/ • /ih/ can not be word final in one-syllable word: /b ih/, /t ih/ • /ah/ can be word final, but only if unstressed. • According to this rule, both /eh/ and /ae/ are lax, because they can not be word-final stressed vowels. In this case, the tense vowel in contrast to /eh/ is /ey/. • However, /ae/ is long in duration (e.g. Forgie and Forgie (1959) and Peterson and Lehiste (1960)), making it acoustically more similar to a tense vowel. • For spectrogram reading, we’re more concerned with acoustics, so we’ll call /ae/ a tense vowel, although others may call it lax.

  19. Phonetics: Distinctive Phonetic Features: The Case of /ae/ • Looking at 130,000 words in the CMU dictionary: • PHN CNT PCNT EXAMPLES • /iy/ 12945 0.10002 • /ih/ 15 0.00012 “chui”, “des”, “kiwani”, “lui”, “moishe”, “pih”, “to” • /eh/ 30 0.00023 “bienvenue”, “des”, “eh”, “moshe”, “yahweh”, “zeh” • /ae/ 5 0.00004 “dhaka”, “lashua”, “losoya”, “pah”, “yeah” • /uw/ 714 0.00552 • /uh/ 2 0.00002 “l’heureux”, “milieu” • /ah/ 6413 0.04955 • /aa/ 170 0.00131 • /ao/ 243 0.00188 • /ey/ 962 0.00743 • /ay/ 379 0.00293 • /oy/ 167 0.00129 • /yu/ 171 0.00132 • /aw/ 226 0.00175 • /ow/ 5137 0.03969 • 0.21280 21% of words end in vowel/diphthong

  20. Phonetics: Distinctive Feature Relationships: Vowels Front Central Back iy ju uw High ih uh ey ix ow oy Mid aw ax ay ao eh ah Low ae aa from Ladefoged, pp. 38, 81, 218 with correction to /aw/

  21. Phonetics: Distinctive Feature Relationships: Consonants approximant obstruent from Olive, p. 28 and Daniloff, p. 56

  22. Phonetics: Distinctive Feature Relationships: Consonants strong fricative from Ladefoged, p. 44

  23. Approximants: Terminology • “Approximants” are NOT the same as “Semi-Vowels” (although Rabiner states they are the same…). American English /r/ is debatable, but we’ll exclude it from the Semi-Vowels for consistency. (Ladefoged p. 229) • Approximants can be divided into two groups: Liquids and Glides Liquid = {/l/, /r/}, Glide = {/w/, /y/} (Again, Rabiner confuses things by mixing up these sets) • Lateral = {/l/} • Retroflex = {/r/, /er/, /axr/}. (In some cases, /er/ is considered a retroflex but /r/ isn’t; we’ll keep things simple by calling /r/ a retroflex). • Central Approximants = {/r/, /w/, /y/}, Lateral Approximant = {/l/}

  24. Approximants: Terminology Approximant Semi-Vowel / Glide Liquid /y/ /w/ Lateral Retroflex /r, er, axr/ /l/ central approximants lateral approximant

More Related