350 likes | 360 Views
Explore the anatomy of bipedalism and the evolution of Australopithecines in this chapter. Learn about their unique characteristics, including the position of the foramen magnum, S-shaped spinal column, wide and foreshortened pelvis, and more. Discover how these early hominins adapted to life on two feet and their relationship to modern humans.
E N D
Human Evolution andPREHISTORY Chapter Six: THE FIRST BIPEDS Link to the Canadian Association for Physical Anthropology
Chapter Preview What is the Anatomy of Bipedalism and How is it Preserved in the Fossil Record? Who Were the Australopithecines and What Were They Like? Why Had Australopithecus Become A Bipedal Walker?
THE ANATOMY OF BIPEDALISM Shared derived characteristics distinguishing hominins from the other African apes • Position of foramen magnum is more forward • S-shaped spinal column • Wide and foreshortened pelvis • “kneeing-in” of thigh bones (femora) • Stable arched foot and absent opposable big toe • Shorter toes
Australopithecus • a well-known hominin that lived between 4.2 and 1 mya in East and South Africa • Bipedal when on the ground • Apelike brain
Gracile Australopithecines • 3.9 to 2 mya in East Africa • 3.5 to 2.3 mya in South Africa • Erect bipeds, about 1-1.5 m. in stature • Apelike skull morphology • Teeth for chewing food in a hominin fashion
Gracile Australopithecines • Earlier fossils show dental features similar to some late Miocene apes; later South African fossils do not • Sexually dimorphic, in body size and canine tooth size
Gracile Australopithecines • Foramen magnum is forward and downward-looking, as in genus Homo • Brain is about a third of a modern human brain in size, and three times larger than Miocene apes • Endocasts suggest that the human cerebral reorganization has not yet occurred • Blood drainage system for the brain is significantly different from genus Homo
Australopithecus Afarensis…“Lucy” • “Lucy”…Discovered by Don Johanson in Kenya in 1974. • Lucy was 40% complete. A great deal can be known of an animal when you are in possession of 40% of its original skeleton. • Video... • Animation of Australopithecines
Australopithecus Africanus…”The Taung Child” • Discovered by Raymond Dart, 1924, South Africa. • Not accepted at the time of discovery as representative of human ancestry.
Australopithecines Two indisputable facts: • Retention of some form of adaptation to arboreal life 2. Evolution of erect bipedal position long before acquiring highly enlarged brain
Robust Australopithecines South Africa • 1.8 to 1 million years ago • Thick bones for their size, with prominent muscle markings • Sagittal crest, for huge temporal muscles (more evident in males) – an example of convergent evolution in gorillas and hominins
Robust Australopithecines East Africa • 2.5 to 1.3 million years ago • More massive skull and larger body size than South African relatives • Enormous molars, premolars, mandible and palate
Gracile-Robust Relationship • East African robust forms likely evolved from earlier gracile forms in east Africa • In South Africa the robusts were either an offshoot of the East African lineage, or convergent evolution from a South African ancestor
Robust-Homo Relationship • Robust australopithecines had evolved into highly efficient and specialized consumers of plant food • Many anthropologists believe this allowed early Homo and robust australopithecines to co-exist for 1.5 million years because they avoided competition for the same ecological niche ** law of competitive exclusion
AUSTRALOPITHECINE PREDECESSORS Sahelanthropus tchadensis (Chad) • 7-6 mya • Small canines and humanlike face • Probably bipedal • Recent 3D reconstruction confirms it is more closely related to hominins • Likely close to common ancestor
AUSTRALOPITHECINE PREDECESSORS Orrorintugenensis (east Africa) • 6 mya • 13 fragments of lower jaw, teeth, thigh bones • Molars are thickly enameled like Australopithecines, but smaller • Suggestion of bipedalism • Uncertain evolutionary relationship
AUSTRALOPITHECINE PREDECESSORS Ardipithecus (east Africa) • 5.8 to 4.4 mya • Sp. kadabba and ramidus • Likely bipedal when on the ground • Mixture of ape and hominin dental features • Forested environment
AUSTRALOPITHECINE PREDECESSORS Kenyanthropus platyops (east Africa) • Contemporary with early east African australopithecines • Maeve Leakey sees her fossil as ancestral to the genus Homo
AUSTRALOPITHECINE PREDECESSORS Relationship to Hominins • Current evidence indicates that hominins evolved from late Miocene apes, becoming distinct about 5 mya • More than one bipedal model emerged from this new primate niche; one of them was Australopithecus • Are any of these predecessors ancestral to the australopithecines or to chimpanzees, or did they become extinct? • Pattern in early hominin evolution has been short periods of change, marked by prolonged periods of stasis
ENVIRONMENT, DIET, AND AUSTRALOPITHECINE ORIGINS Major climatic changes in the late Miocene: • Drying up of the Mediterranean Sea • Breaking up of forests • Creation of a mosaic environment with more open areas, interspersed with forest patches
Effect of Climatic Change • Change in diet - less “tree” food - more open ground foraging, e.g. seeds, grasses, roots 2. Change in dentition - smaller canine teeth - male canines became as small as those of females
Australopithecines and Tools • No evidence of toolmaking clearly associated with Australopithecines, although hands of later Australopithecines were suitable • Could Australopithecus have been a tool-user and maker of simple tools such as bonobos and chimpanzees today? • They could have used wooden tools, convenient stones, animal bones
HUMAN BIPEDALISM Disadvantages • More visible to predators • Exposes soft underbelly • Interferes with ability to change direction instantly while running • Not a fast locomotion method • Frequent lower back problems and circulatory problems • Serious impediment if one leg is injured ** all of these disadvantages placed our early hominin ancestors at risk Becoming Human Site
HUMAN BIPEDALISM How did bipedalism become a viable adaptation? Possible selective pressures: 1. Males gather and transport food to females, who were restricted by dependency of offspring 2. Nonterritorial, far-ranging scavenging, because a biped is able to travel long distances without tiring 3. To cope with heat stress out in the open
ORIGINAL STUDY The Naked and the Bipedal • Upright stance greatly reduces the amount of the body’s surface area that is directly exposed to the sun and increases the amount exposed to the cooler breezes a few feet above the ground • Hair loss helps to lose more body heat • The “naked biped” becomes an adaptation to the heat of the savanna by keeping the brain cool and allowing for its expansion
HUMAN BIPEDALISM • Bipedalism is far more economical than quadrupedal locomotion at walking speed The causes of bipedalism are likely to be multiple e.g. food transport AND carrying infants AND reaching for food AND seeing predators AND using hands as protection
NEXT TIME: Homo habilis and Cultural Origins