1 / 34

Consensus building workshop

Consensus building workshop. Conference track. Outline. Introduction (ideas behind the track) Evaluation Discussion – interesting mappings. Conference track - Features. Broadly understandable domain Conference Organisation Free exploration by participants within 10 ontologies

alyn
Download Presentation

Consensus building workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Consensus building workshop Conference track

  2. Outline • Introduction (ideas behind the track) • Evaluation • Discussion – interesting mappings

  3. Conference track - Features • Broadly understandable domain Conference Organisation • Free exploration by participants within 10 ontologies • No a priori reference alignment • Participants: 6 research groups

  4. Conference track - Dataset OWL, tool Protege

  5. Conference track - Participants • 6 participants • Automs • Coma++ • OWL-CtxMatch • Falcon • HMatch • RiMOM

  6. Conference track - Goals • Focus on interesting mappings and unclear mappings • Why should they be mapped? • Arguments: against and for • Which systems did discover them? • Differences in similarity measures • Underlying techniques?

  7. Outline… • Introduction (ideas behind the track) • Evaluation • Discussion – interesting mappings

  8. Evaluation • Processing all mappings by hand • Assessment based on personal judgement of organisers (consistency problem) • Tags: TP, FP, interesting, ?, heterogenous mapping • Types of errors and phenomena: • subsumption, inverseproperty, siblings, lexical confusion

  9. Evaluation… • Subsumption mistaken for equivalence • Author,Paper_Author • Conference_Trip, Conference_part • Inverseproperty • has_author,authorOf • Siblings mistaken for equivalence • ProgramCommittee,Technical_commitee • Lexical confusion error • program,Program_chair • Relation – Class mapping • has_abstract,Abstract • Topic,coversTopic; read_paper,Paper

  10. Evaluation… • Some statistics as a side-effect of processing

  11. Evaluation…

  12. Evaluation… • Distribution of similarity measures • for True Positive Mappings and • for False Positive Mappings

  13. Evaluation…

  14. Evaluation…

  15. Evaluation…

  16. Evaluation…

  17. Record it!

  18. Outline… • Introduction (ideas behind the track) • Evaluation • Discussion – interesting mappings

  19. Discussion • Focus on interesting mappings and unclear mappings • Why should they be mapped? • Arguments: against and for • Which systems discover them? • Differences in similarity measures • Underlying techniques?

  20. Mapping 1

  21. Mapping 1 Iasted confious sigkdd sofsem ekaw confOf PCS

  22. Mapping 2

  23. Mapping 3

  24. Mapping 4

  25. Mapping 4 confOf ekaw

  26. Mapping 5

  27. Mapping 5 ekaw confious

  28. Mapping 8

  29. Mapping 8 OpenConf cmt

  30. Mapping 11

  31. Mapping 11 ekaw iasted sigkdd Location is domain of properties: locationOf Location is range of properties: heldIn iasted:Place is domain of properties: is_equipped_by sigkdd:Place is range of properties: can_stay_in Asserted conditions for iasted:Place

  32. Mapping 12

  33. Call for contribution to our dataset

  34. Thank you for your participation!

More Related