500 likes | 661 Views
P13623: Conductive Heat Transfer Lab Equipment. Detailed Design Review May 2nd, 2013. Project Participants. Project Sponsor : RIT KGCOE, Chemical Engineering Dept. Dr. Karuna S. Koppula Mr. Paul Gregorius MSD 1 Team Guide: Michael Antoniades Project Members:
E N D
P13623: Conductive Heat Transfer Lab Equipment Detailed Design Review May 2nd, 2013
Project Participants Project Sponsor : RIT KGCOE, Chemical Engineering Dept. Dr. Karuna S. Koppula Mr. Paul Gregorius MSD 1 Team Guide: Michael Antoniades Project Members: • David Olney - (ChemE) Project Manager • Todd Jackson - (ME) Project Engineer • AlyshaHelenic - (ChemE) Documentation Engineer • Edward Turfitt - (ChemE) Design/Concept Engineer • Charles Pueschel - (ChemE) Data Acquisition Specialist • Ian Abramson - (ChemE) Customer Liaison
Agenda • Introduction • Quick recap of objective and customer needs • Recap of system design review feedback • Main problems that were addressed • Detailed Design • Review final design • Talk about the improvements • Talk about overall functionality • Discuss educational value • Review pros and cons • Controls and electronic schematics • High level overview of functionality • LED visual • Data acquisition • BOM • Indicate high cost items • Review material disposition • Risk Assessment • High level concerns • Test and Assembly Plans • Questions
Project Overview Problem Statement: • Build an apparatus that can demonstrate thermal conductivity reliably to students for educational purposes. Resources: • The only limitation we have is the set budget for the project. • (space, cart, current lab equipment, donations) excluded from budget. Expectations: • The purpose of this detailed session is for constructive criticism, and validation by the customer for some of our final design that we have derived.
Heat Transfer and Thermal Conductivity • Heat transfer can take place from three methods (Conduction, Convection , Radiation). • The most valuable method to calculate a constants for one specific mode of heat transfer is to reduce or eliminate the other two modes.
System Design Review Recap Key Features • Device will contain use a disk heater, and cold plate to induce a heat gradient. • Ability to use different length samples with multiple shapes and sizes. • Ability to use different insulations for educational purposes. • Usage of a DAQ and labview. • Transparent outer shell to see inside.
System Design Concerns • Thermocouple mounting • Inserting samples • Functionality (having a visual model of our design to convey exactly what we are building and how it will function)
Temperature Sensors • Higher Temperature Thermistors • Operating Temperature Range of -55°C ~ 200°C • Accuracy of ±1% • Lower Temperature Temperature Sensor • Operating Temperature Range of -40°C ~ 125°C • Accuarcy of ±0.5°C
Other Sensors • Pressure Sensor (100 lb) • Application of proper pressure to the samples for good contact. • Current Sensor • Current rating of 25 A • Magnetic Door Sensor • Detects if door is left open and signals to close the door while running experiment to prevent convection losses.
Visualizing Data • LCD Screen • Backlit LCD screen to display temperature readings for manual data collection. • Labview • Display temperature readings and digital data collection. • LEDs • Visualise the temperature difference across the sample.
Improvements • Educational Value • Dynamic, can vary: • Size, shape, and material of sample • Type of insulation • Orientation of instrument • Contact resistant • Cooling fluid • Visual • LED lights to indicate changing temperature of the sample • Plexiglass slides to allow for viewing inside • Data Collection • Manual through LCD screen or through LabView • Thermal Conductivity Calculation • Vary heat flux or temperature • 2. Ease of Use (Intuition) • Open-fail safety feature • Pressure sensor to prevent over-tightening • Ability to remove side panel for easy access • Adjust temperature sensor placement after sample placement • 3. Originality • Dynamic • Liquid boat option
Temperature In Sample versus Length • Assumptions: Steady State, No conduction or convection from the air on the sample. q = Q/A =-k(dT/dx) Given Targets: Q = 500 W, Target ΔT = 120 K Chosen Parameters: T0 = 273 K, D = ¾”, L = ½’
Bill of Materials - Sample Bill of Materials – Total
High Cost Items Heater - $45.79 Cold Plate - $100.80 Temperature Controller- $146.91 DAQ - $58.94
Assembly Overview • Week 10 begin ordering parts • Parts should arrive over the break and will be stored until the fall semester. • Build all mechanical parts first then begin assembly of the mechanical press by building the frame first, drilling and threading all holes and parts assembling the top last • Enclose the structure with plexi-glass. • Once assembled confirm that the device will be operational and will function as desired. • Start assembling electronic components and assembling them to the frame etc. • Begin testing of the device and ensure everything is running optimally. • Begin improvement phase for device performance.
MSD I and MSD II Goals and Deliverables Project Organization Define Customer Needs and Specs Develop Concepts Create System Level Design Create Detailed Design • Hold System Design Review • Revise design based on Review • Create test and assembly plans • Write BOM • Order Materials • Hold Detailed Design Review Week 1 - 2 Week 2-10 Update Project Plan with parts obtained Week 10-13 Design Verification Week 12-14 Write Technical Paper Week 14 Create Poster Final Presentation • Execute test plans • Build system • Verify design through testing