1 / 34

Panther B ot T ool C hanger

MAE 4193 – Mechanical Design 1 Project Review Presentation. Panther B ot T ool C hanger. Jameson L. Tai  William Rae  Justin Nunn In Partnership with .

amadis
Download Presentation

Panther B ot T ool C hanger

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MAE 4193 – Mechanical Design 1 Project Review Presentation PantherBot Tool Changer • Jameson L. Tai  William Rae  Justin Nunn • In Partnership with All logos in this presentation is courtesy of the Florida Institute of Technology Robotics and Spatial Systems Laboratory and the Florida Tech Office of Creative Services.

  2. Introduction • Project Background • Design Objectives • Design & Analysis • Detailed Drawings • Fabrication and Testing Plan • Budget • Team Organization • Scheduling • Conclusion

  3. Project Background • The PantherBot, also known as the PowerBot made by MobileRobots, Inc., is a multifunctional robot • autonomously mapping terrain • equipped with sonar and laser range finder • robotic arm fitted with a parallel gripper and webcam • has a 802.11b WiFi antenna for wireless communications (Image Source: RASSL)

  4. Project Background (Image Source: RASSL)

  5. Project Background • This team will create an autonomous tool changer such that the PantherBot will be able to perform the following functions inside the Olin Engineering Complex: • Open doors via twisting door handles • Open front door via pressing the handicap accessible button • Press appropriate buttons to recall and operate an elevator (Image Source: Robotics and Spatial Systems Laboratory (RASSL))

  6. Design Objectives • Safety of people, building and robot • Functional tools for tasks • Autonomous tool changes • Positive control of tools • Secure storage • Store tools away from sensors and access areas

  7. Design and Analysis Plan Combination of CAD and physical prototypes • CAD • 3D models allow testing of mechanisms • Test designs for fit and easily produce drawings • Prototyping • Evaluate concepts with real world interactions • Low cost testing

  8. Design and Analysis Plan • CAE • Direct import of CAD models for structural testing • Find areas of weakness and excessive strength • Determine forces exerted on components in normal operation

  9. Design and Analysis Plan Material Selection • Cost, Strength, Machineablilty, Surface Finish • Priority goes to Cost and Surface Finish due to the fact that our machined components are simple and exposed to relatively small forces. • A major project goal is ensuring that all components meet the visual standard of the existing robot

  10. Drawings

  11. Tool 1 Video

  12. Drawings

  13. Drawings

  14. Tool 3 Video

  15. Drawings

  16. Holder Video

  17. Analysis

  18. Analysis

  19. Tool 2 Analysis Video

  20. Analysis

  21. Fabrication Plan • We will fabricate parts through Building 538 (Machine Shop) • We will obtain reasonable off-the-counter parts if it is more cost effective to purchase the part than to produce in-house, such as bearings.

  22. Testing Plan • We have set aside a budget for a testing rig, which will provide a viable test platform • Opening doors • Pushing door panel button • Pushing elevator buttons • The testing platform will provide feedback to the team regarding the repeatability of the tools, ease of operation, and storage functions. • Also, it will help determine if there are any problems with the tools before the PantherBot performs the predefined functions inside Olin Engineering Complex.

  23. Organizational Breakdown

  24. Project Timeline

  25. Project Timeline Fall 2008 • Complete research in door opening techniques • Pushing door (September 2008) • Pulling door (September 2008) • Present tool design (October 2008) • Present tool changer rack design (October 2008) • Preliminary Design Review • Presentation (22 October 2008) • Report (22 October 2008) • Analysis on tools and tool changer (November 2008) • Final Presentation (03 December 2008) • Final Report (03 December 2008)

  26. Project Timeline Spring 2009 • Fabrication (February 2009) • Testing (March 2009) • Showcase (April 2009)

  27. Material Selection Chart • Minimum of three sources used for pricing • Lowest price used for comparisons • Multiple types of materials researched for each part • Typically common materials were researched as these are easiest to find • Weight factors vary for every part based on what is needed

  28. Material Selection Chart

  29. Budget Overview • Prototyping will be done with low cost easily machined materials • Materials such as plywood and cardboard are examples of such materials • Test Stand will be built out of low cost materials that accurately portray school facilities • To save money we are trying to work with facilities to get parts such as a door handle

  30. Budget Overview • Final design will be constructed from materials such as aluminum and steel • To save money we will be attempting to get donations for the material we require, as well as use left over material from previous years • Coatings will be required to prevent damage to both the robot and to the school facilities • Coatings will most likely be made out of rubber or plastic

  31. Budget Overview • Our current budget was developed without consideration of possible donations • Design changes might drastically change what is required • A small buffer was made in the budget to compensate for this

  32. Budget • Test Stand Hardware $ 150 • Shop Materials/Metals $ 400 • Bushings/Bearings/Shafting $ 100 • Surface finishing $ 50 • Prototyping $ 100 • Miscellaneous Hardware $ 50 • Total Budget $ 850

  33. Conclusion • We have completed our design process and are currently working on analysis and optimization. • We have conducted initial cost analysis based on material selection charts and component availability. • We are on-schedule according to our Gantt Chart and will expect to complete the project on time by April 2009.

  34. Questions?

More Related