170 likes | 474 Views
GOG0172: The Dings. The recommended regimen is not feasible Substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin Reduce cisplatin from 100 mg/m 2 to 75 mg/m 2 Change paclitaxel infusion and/or schedule Need for 6 cycles not established Role of intraperitoneal delivery not established
E N D
GOG0172: The Dings • The recommended regimen is not feasible • Substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin • Reduce cisplatin from 100 mg/m2 to 75 mg/m2 • Change paclitaxel infusion and/or schedule • Need for 6 cycles not established • Role of intraperitoneal delivery not established • Trial design flawed (too many variables) • Dose-intensity hypothesis not validated • Potential role of biology, angiogenesis, microenvironment • This should not be our research priority
GOG157: Ovarian (adjuvant) • Epithelial Ovarian Cancer • Stage IC/II any grade • Stage IA/B high grade • No prior therapy Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h) Carboplatin AUC=7.5 I x 3 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h) Carboplatin AUC=7.5 II x 6 • Only 70% met eligibility criteria (133 excluded) • 107/457 (23%) were incompletely staged • Hematologic toxicity and neuropathy increased with 6 cycles Open: 20-Mar-95 Closed: 25-May-98 Accrual: 457 pts Bell JG, et al. Gynecol Oncol 102:432-9, 2006
GOG157: Ovarian (adjuvant) Carbo-Paclitaxel (x6) (n = 214) 83% @ 5 y Carbo-Paclitaxel (x3) (n = 213) 81% @ 5 y Hazard Ratio = 1.02 95% CI = 0.662 – 1.57, p=0.94 (includes 107 surgical exclusions) Bell JG, et al. Gynecol Oncol 102:432-9, 2006
GOG111: Ovarian (suboptimal III/IV) Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide 650 mg/m2 I • Epithelial Ovarian Cancer • Suboptimal Stage III/IV • No prior therapy Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 (24 h) II Open: 13-Apr-90 Closed: 02-Mar-92 Accrual: 410 pts McGuire, et al. N Engl J Med 334:1-6, 1996
GOG132: Ovarian (suboptimal III/IV) I Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 • Epithelial Ovarian Cancer • Suboptimal Stage III/IV • No prior therapy • Crossover allowed II Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (24 h) Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 (24 h) III Open: 20-Mar-92 Closed: 09-May-94 Accrual: 648 pts Muggia, et al. J Clin Oncol 18:106, 2000
10 m GOG111 & 132: Ovarian (subopt III/IV) GOG-111 (n = 184) CDDP 75 and Paclitaxel 135 Median = 37 m GOG-132 (n = 201) CDDP 75 and Paclitaxel 135 Median = 27 m Muggia, et al. J Clin Oncol 18:106, 2000 McGuire, et al. N Engl J Med 334:1-6, 1996
GOG158: Ovarian (optimal III) Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 (24 h) I • Epithelial Ovarian Cancer • Optimal Stage III • No prior therapy • Elective Second-Look • Non-Inferiority Design Carboplatin AUC 7.5 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h) II Open: 03-Apr-95 Closed: 26-Jan-98 Accrual: 792 pts (evaluable) Ozols, et al. Proc J Clin Oncol 21:3194, 2003
GOG172: Ovarian (optimal III) • Epithelial Ovarian Cancer • Optimal Stage III • No prior therapy • Elective Second-Look Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 (24 h) I Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IP d1 Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 (24 h) IV d1 Paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 IP d8 II Open: 23-Mar-98 Closed: 29-Jan-01 Accrual: 416 pts (evaluable) Armstrong, et al. NEJM 354:34-43, 2006
CDDP (IV) Paclitaxel (IV) (n = 400) Ozols, et al. J Clin Oncol 21:3194, 2003 GOG172 & 158: Exploratory Analysis CDDP (IP) Paclitaxel (IP+IV) (n = 206) CDDP (IV) Paclitaxel (IV) (n = 210) Armstrong, et al. NEJM 354:34-43, 2006
GOG: Combined Exploratory Analysis GOG172 to GOG158: HR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.59 – 1.11) Ozols, et al. Gynecol Oncol 103:1-6, 2006
Ovarian Cancer: Biologic Opportunities • Unique Biology of the Müllerian Epithelium and Peritoneal Cavity • Specialized relationship; spread via implantation • Frequent production of ascites, associated with VEGF • Negative immunoregulation (VEGF, IL-10, IL-6, IL-12, APC) • Growth Factor Receptors • EGF-R frequently expressed, mutations uncommon, frequency of overexpression variable • HER2/neu frequently expressed, high-level overexpression <15%, gene amplification uncommon • ER/PR/AR frequently expressed, variable functionality • Other receptors less well characterized • Growth Factor Production • Frequent high-level expression of VEGF • Increased expression of IL10, IL6, TNF, TGFα
GOG0170D: Bevacizumab Phase II • Epithelial Ovarian Cancer • ≤ 2 Prior Therapies • RECIST Measurable • PS 0,1 • Two-stage accrual design • Primary endpoint PFS @6 m I Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg q3wk • Overall response rate 12/62 (19.4%), including 3 CR • 42% of pts alive and free of progression at 6 m • Median number of cycles = 7, range = 1 to 29 Open: Apr-02 Closed: Aug-04 Accrual: 62 pts Burger et al., Proc Ann Meet ASCO 24:A5009
GOG0170-D (n = 62) PFS @ 6 m = 0.42 GOG0126 Series (n = 220) Platinum-Resistant Disease PFS @ 6 m = 0.16 (SE 0.025) GOG0170D: Bevacizumab Phase II Burger et al., Proc Ann Meet ASCO 24:A5009
GOG218: Ovarian (stage III-IV) • Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Cancer • Suboptimal Cytoreduction • Collaborative design (GOG, NCI, Genentech) Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h) Carboplatin AUC=6.0 Placebo q21d* Placebo (14 m total) I x 6 Placebo (14 m total) Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h) Carboplatin AUC=6.0 Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg q21d* II x 6 Bevacizumab (14 m total) Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h) Carboplatin AUC=6.0 Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg q21d* III x 6 *starting with C2 Open: 26-Sep-05 Closed: --- Target Accrual: 2000 pts (3 Y) Burger, et al.
If IP Therapy is Really So Important… • Why has it been more than 2 years without an active GOG phase III trial for women with ovarian cancer and optimal cytoreductive surgery? • Where is the funding to support scientific investigation of IP therapy using generic off-patent medications (cisplatin and paclitaxel)? • Should our patients commit to increased toxicity and 2-3 days in the hospital with each cycle of “recommended” therapy? • Are we prepared to evaluate all new agents “IP” and “IV”? • Should IP therapy have a higher priority than evaluation of targeted agents, immunomodulation, and tumor molecular profiling?
Revised 14-Oct-2006 NCI Clinical Announcement (05-JAN-2006) two cycles of ^ and potential risks ^ compared to standard IV chemotherapy ^ some ^ route ^ such as GOG0218 and ICON7, ^