190 likes | 451 Views
Research issues. Christiane Grünloh Maria Svedin Nino Amvrosiadi 21.01.2013. Doing Research. Research entails a systematic search for knowledge Different types of research Hypothesis-generating / -testing research Research using qualitative / quantitative methods
E N D
Research issues Christiane Grünloh Maria Svedin Nino Amvrosiadi 21.01.2013
Doing Research Research entails a systematic search for knowledge • Different types of research • Hypothesis-generating / -testing research • Research using qualitative / quantitative methods • Research explaining phenomena by means of natural law • Research increasing and deepening knowledge about events processes or texts • Basic research / applied or commissioned research • Research combined with healthcare • … Petersson et al. 2006 Hermerén, 2011
Doing Research (excerpt) • Before • Choose and precisely define research question • Plan the study so that it allows to answer the question • Choose methods with the fewest imaginable harmful consequences • Choose research subjects nonarbitrary, provide information, obtain their consent, make sure they have insurance coverage • … • During • Apply the methods correctly and competently, avoid risks • Analyse material systematically and critically • Don’t exclude “unwanted” observations, handle dropouts accurately. Evaluate the reliability of the results. • Keep record about the progressing work • … Petersson et al. 2006 Hermerén, 2011
Doing Research (excerpt) • After • Exhibit clarity, order and structure within the whole project, the documentation, the report • Publication, retention and archiving of material • … • Throughout the whole project • Observe the ethical criteria and reflect on the project • Comply with basic research ethics principles • Evaluate total quality of research; weigh benefit of research and the scientific value of its expected result against its harmful consequences • Take into consideration the determination of research • … Petersson et al. 2006 Hermerén, 2011
Doing Research • Challenges: • Choosing the right method: Generalizability and Objectivity can stand in opposition to the interest and “depth” of the scientific claim • Optimize the possibilities to use the positive effects of research • Minimize the negative ones • Abide to the Uppsala-Code: Avoid research that can lead to ecological harm or the development of weapons, or that is in conflict with basic human rights. • ... Petersson et al. 2006 Hermerén, 2011
Who is a good researcher? • ”Good researchers seek and speak the truth.” (ICSU report, 2008) OR • Good researchers successfully conduct research as it is defined above.
Once good in something, good in everything? • A brilliant mind need not always be accompanied by a pure heart. • Our judgement is not objective: • If good researcher, he/she is also entitled as moral person in the back of our head • If not moral person, we don’t easily characterize him/her as good researcer.
Can we accept a description as: A great researcher that was also a criminal? Or even: A criminal that was also a great researcher?
References Petersson et al. 2006 Bengt Petersson, Göran Hermerén, and Bo Gustafsson (2006) Goodresearchpractice - whatisit? Views, guidelinesandexamples. ICSU report, 2008 International Council for Science (2008) Freedom, Responsibility and Universality of Science; ISBN 978-0-930357-68-9 Hermerén, 2011 Göran Hermerén (2011) Goodresearchpractice.