1 / 18

Asset Protection in Florida: Practical Tips for Small Business Owners

Asset Protection in Florida: Practical Tips for Small Business Owners. Part 4: Off-Shore Planning. Phillip B. Rarick, Esq. Rarick & Beskin, P.A. 6500 Cowpen Rd., Suite 204 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 www.raricklaw.com (305) 556-5209 prarick@raricklaw.com. Off-Shore Planning. Introduction

aman
Download Presentation

Asset Protection in Florida: Practical Tips for Small Business Owners

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Asset Protection in Florida: Practical Tips for Small Business Owners Part 4: Off-Shore Planning Phillip B. Rarick, Esq. Rarick & Beskin, P.A. 6500 Cowpen Rd., Suite 204 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 www.raricklaw.com (305) 556-5209 prarick@raricklaw.com

  2. Off-Shore Planning • Introduction • Not just for the very wealthy • Quality off-shore jurisdictions • Predictability of off-shore jurisdictions vs. U.S. Court system and the “result oriented” judge • Not for avoidance of income taxes • Not a substitute for avoiding filing bankruptcy • Limitation of on-shore planning • Tied to state of domicile

  3. Why Consider Off-shore Planning • Completely change the rules of the game when your creditor must go to an off-shore jurisdiction: #1 Must get another attorney in the off-shore jurisdiction • “Self-settled trust” rule is not applicable • For self settled spendthrift trust – settlor can establish a trust for his own benefit; can be grantor – should not be trustee • No full faith and credit: U.S. judgments are not recognized • Need trial de novo under the laws of the foreign jurisdiction • No contingent fees: creditor must pay the local attorney as litigation proceeds; substantial retainer required.

  4. Why Consider Off-shore Planning Cont. • “Loser pays” is usually applicable • Creditor must post bond • Higher standard of proof: “beyond a reasonable doubt.” This is the traditional American criminal standard. • Burden of proof is always on the creditor • Short fuse: A shorter statute of limitations will apply. Often statute begins to run when assets transferred to trust. U.S. law usually 4 years; several off-shore have 2 year statute of limitations. • Statute of Elizabeth overruled. This is the English forerunner of our Fraudulent conveyance act.

  5. Why to Not Use Off-shore Planning • More IRS reporting: Client needs CPA familiar with reporting requirements for foreign accounts. • Reporting requirements: • FBAR: Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts. • Any citizen or resident that has financial interest or signature authority over any financial account in a foreign country with an aggregate value exceeding $10,000. If close call, file.

  6. Structure of an Off-shore Trust • Trustee: Single foreign trustee • Trust Protector: • Power to remove and replace trustee • Veto investment decisions of the trustee • Veto distribution decisions of the trustee • Who can serve? • Not advisable for client or member of family • If client insists, must resign in event of legal threat

  7. Structure of an Off-shore Trust Cont. • Anti-duress provision • Often, off-shore trust allows settlor or trust protector to advise the trustee, direct or veto a trustee action or remove and replace trustee. • Anti-duress clause directs the foreign trustee to ignore any advice, order, or instruction given under duress. • Flee Provisions or “Pull the plug” Provision • Allows trustee to change situs of the trust – this is where the trust is bases

  8. Best Kept Secret: Nevis Limited Liability Company • Advantages of Nevis LLC: • More control than off-shore trust • Less expensive than off-shore trust • Strongest, most comprehensive laws • Example: has “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard • Geographic proximity • Local attorney problem for creditors • No local taxes • Record to date is 100%: no U.S. creditor has successfully secured judgment in Nevis • LLC law similar to Florida

  9. What & Where are Nevis & St. Kitts • Sovereign Country, member of British Commonwealth and United Nations (participated in the Olympics) • British Parliamentary system • Politically stable: 96% literacy rate – highest in the Western hemisphere • Population: 12,000 • Location: Southwest of Virgin Islands • Main city: Charleston • Birthplace of Alexander Hamilton

  10. Structure of a Nevis LLC • Operating Agreement similar to Florida LLC • Manager managed • Manager can be client • Can transfer to off-shore manager • Best plan for a physician who chooses to go bare or minimal insurance • Nevis Island LLC with “pull the plug” provision • Cook Island Asset Protection Trust with Cook Island trustee

  11. Take-away Points for Off-shore Planning • Consider a Nevis LLC as a component or principal part of any off-shore plan • IRS reporting requirements must be followed • have a CPA familiar with such requirements • If properly structured, assets are well protected from most creditors other than Federal creditors

  12. FUTA: Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act • Transfers under Florida Statute 726.105 • A transfer is fraudulent if made “with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor.” The creditor may rely on the “badges of fraud.” • The transfer was of substantially all the debtor’s assets. • The debtor was insolvent or became insolvent shortly after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred. • The transfer occurred shortly before or shortly after a substantial debt was incurred.

  13. Fraudulent Conversion • Transfer of non-exempt property to exempt property is prohibited • Example: after judgment, debtor takes her $100,000 CD and purchases an annuity

  14. Fraudulent Transfer is Not Equivalent of Common Law Fraud • Florida Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit only common law fraud • Common law fraud is an intentional tort. • Not unethical to assist client in transaction later deemed to be fraudulent transfer. See Freeman v. First Union National Bank, 865 So. 2d 12721 (Fla. 2004); see also Kleinfeld & Alper, The Florida Supreme Court Finds No Liability for Aiding and Abetting a Fraudulent Transfer, 78 Fla. Bar J. (June 2004).

  15. Present Creditors vs. Future Creditors • Before receive summons • After receive summons • After judgment • Statute of Limitations: 4 years after transfer made or if later, within 1 year after the transfer was or reasonable could have been discovered. F.S. 726.110(1).

  16. Final Take-away Points • Timing is critical • How you hold title is critical. • Protect the rock.

More Related