1 / 21

Participation and Empowerment of Migrants in Austria

Participation and Empowerment of Migrants in Austria. EU-Grundtvig Project 22 – 25 March 2011 Caritas Linz – MigrantInnenhilfe Mag. Evelina Glöckner. Overview. Facts & Figures National Level - Legal Framework - Impact on Politics

Download Presentation

Participation and Empowerment of Migrants in Austria

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Participation and Empowerment of Migrants in Austria EU-Grundtvig Project 22 – 25 March 2011 Caritas Linz – MigrantInnenhilfe Mag. Evelina Glöckner

  2. Overview • Facts & Figures • National Level -Legal Framework - Impact on Politics - Impact on Economy (also Employment, Education und Qualification) - Impact on Culture • Regional Level -Integration Concept of Upper Austria - Integration Concept Vienna • Organisational Level - Empowerment Concept „Help the people to help themselves“ - Objectives - Obstacles to Empowerment (Society and individual obstacles; organisational Bottlenecks)

  3. At the beginning of 2010: Foreign residents:895,000 (10.7%) Residents with a migrant background:1,468 million (17.8%) First generation : 1,082 million Second generation:385,500 Facts & Figures

  4. Facts & Figures „Old/traditional“ migrants (mainly third-country nationals): • Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo – 207,000 • Turkey –183,000 • Bosnia and Herzegovina –130,000 • Croatia –70,000 „New“ migrants (mainly EU): • Germany –213,000 • Romania –63,000 • Poland –59,000 • Czeck Republic –46,000 • Hungary –39,000 • Italy –29,000

  5. National LevelLegal Framework • Austria has no comprehensive integration strategy– a fact that was noted with concern by the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) in its fourth report on Austria published in March 2010 • In 2010, the government committed to aNational Action Plan for Integration, after years of NGO consultations, an integration plattform, expert reports and panels, statistics and new indicators. This process of policy change has produced much paper and discussion, but few improvements so far • Most initiatives to promote integration are still local and regional projects, limited in time and reach.These ‘best practices’ cannot overcome all the obstacles to integration in the national legal framework • Austrian Integration Fund

  6. National Level Impact on Politics • Third country nationals haveno right to vote und to stand for elections(minicipal councils, provincial parliaments, national parliament) • Political participation in trade unions and representations of interests ist possible but restricted(Workers´ Councils, Student representation) • Participation through„Foreigners` Councils“ (Ausländerbeiräte) • Traditional route of political participation istnaturalisation (obtaining Austrian citizenship)

  7. National Level Impact on Politics • Political parties began to discover the potential of immigrant votes in elections in recent years andstarted placing naturalised immigrants to their lists • Self-organisation of immigrants/ migrant organisations • Austria’s foreign residents have been encouraged to participate politically throughad hoc funding and consultations(e.g. in Graz, Vienna, Styria). That these projects have been overlooked for national policy is a major weakness in Austria’s National Action Plan for Integration

  8. National Level Impact on Economy • Migrants have alower annual incomethan natives, due to various factors: lower skills and concentration on low wage industries, high proportion of seasonal work and limited opportunities to join core work force of enterprises • Migrants tend to havehigher unemployment ratesthan natives • Migrants areincreasingly turning to self-employmentby setting up business in services und retail trade (cleaning, restaurants, food, transportation, etc.) • Austria has not been able yet to attract highly skilled migrant workers in large numberseither because of limited demand for these skills or because of perceived or real bureaucratic hurdles and red tape

  9. National LevelImpact on Economy Employment • Migrants have been included in the country’s labour market objectives.Combined language and vocational training ist being offered • Migrant youth may get better jobs throughcareer coaching and mentoring, while migrant women may benefit fromspecial programmes on language, health, sports and domestic violence • In the future,government wants more migrants in the public sector, including the police, schools, justice, health • Ending EU citizens’ transitional measures in May 2011(2013 for BG and RO)

  10. National LevelImpact on Economy Obstacles to employment • Recognition of foreign qualifications • Low educational level (third country residents) • Insufficient language proficiency • No free access to the labour market for non-EU temporary residents • Discrimination

  11. National LevelImpact on Economy Education and Qualification • The number of immigrants in the highest and lowest education levels is above average ( lowest – third country nationals, highest mainly EU immigrants) • Compulsory Kindergarten year for preschool aged children • Immigrant pupils rarely attend schools where they can earn a high school diploma. They attend more offen secondary, polytechnic, and vocational schools • In special needs schools the proportion of foreign children was almost twice as high, at about 19%, mostly citizens of former Yugoslavia and Turkey

  12. National LevelImpact on Economy Education and Qualification • The educational level of the second generation has already considerably adapted to that of the Austrian population (an above average percentage of the Austrian population has completed mid-level education in trade and vocational training programs) • There is an urgent need for action with young people who have only completed compulsory school or have no leaving certificate • Around 15% of the non-German speaking schoolchildren who have completed the eighth school year at a secondary school do not continue their education

  13. National LevelImpact on Culture • Role of food as indicator for growing cultural diversity. Growing number of Turkish, Asian and Latin American restaurants • Public service broadcasting station ORF offers broadcasts on the radio, a TV programme on migration and minorities issues and run a news homepage • Migrants’ print mediaare limited to papers of individual associations • Radio is of great relevance for immigrant groups as well as Internet. • Contribution of large number of theatre projects and small companies off the mainstream • Fashion: especially noticeable in field of education, high percentage of third country nationals studying fashion at the University of Applied Arts in Vienna • Cultural policy is still criticised for not committing itself to create a sustainable infrastructure for development and establishment of a “migrant-culture”

  14. Regional Level Integration Concept of Upper Austria (Integrationsleitbild Oberösterreich) www.ooe.gv.at

  15. Regional Level

  16. Regional Level „Integration and Diversity“ Integration Concept Vienna www.wien.gv.at/integration

  17. Organisational Level Empowerment Concept „Help the people to help themselves“ • Legal counseling • Financial und material help • Support in case of problems with authorities • Integration events • German language courses • Pool of interpreteurs • Interreligious dialogue • Women`s empowerment projects • Seminars and Workshops

  18. Organisational Level Objectives • Reduce information deficits in migrant communities on austrian health, welfare and education system • Improve German skills • Increase health awareness among migrant communities • Increase the take-up rate of education and health facilities • Foster participation and autonomy of migrants • Reduce deprivation • Increase take-up rate of public transfers and cost-free services • Foster intercultural dialogue • Fight racism and xenophobia

  19. Legal und sozial disadvantage Political inequality Stigmatisation Discrimination Disqualification Xenophobia Mobbing Judgement by appearance Automatic exclusion Unequal chances Verbal aggressions/insults Emotional violence Organisational Level Obstacles to Empowerment (Society)

  20. Culture shock Life-changing crisis Psychlogical disorders Deprivation Disorganisation Devaluation Regression Helplessness Anger Blackout Thought of suicide Depression Low self-esteem Lack of perspectives Lack of knowledge Identity problems Sorrow Depts Organisational Level Obstacles to Empowerment (individual)

  21. Organisational Level Obstacles to Empowerment (organisational Bottlenecks)

More Related