1 / 19

GALPROP & Modeling the Diffuse g -ray Emission

GALPROP & Modeling the Diffuse g -ray Emission. Modified from talk of Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford U.). CR Interactions in the Interstellar Medium. SNR RX J1713-3946. 42 sigma (2003+2004 data). B. HESS Preliminary. PSF. π. 0. e. e. e. π. π. gas. gas. _. +. +. +. +. +.

amanda
Download Presentation

GALPROP & Modeling the Diffuse g -ray Emission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GALPROP & Modeling the Diffuse g-ray Emission Modified from talk of Igor V. Moskalenko (Stanford U.)

  2. CR Interactions in the Interstellar Medium SNR RX J1713-3946 42 sigma (2003+2004 data) B HESS Preliminary PSF π 0 e e e π π gas gas _ + + + + + - - - - - P ISM X,γ synchrotron Chandra IC ISRF P He CNO diffusion energy losses reacceleration convection etc. bremss GLAST p Flux LiBeB He CNO 20 GeV/n BESS • CR species: • Only 1 location • modulation PAMELA ACE AMS helio-modulation

  3. Diffuse Galactic Gamma-ray Emission ~80% of total Milky Way luminosity at HE !!! Tracer of CR (p, e−) interactions in the ISM (π0,IC,bremss): • Study of CR species in distant locations (spectra & intensities) • CR acceleration (SNRs, pulsars etc.) and propagation • Emission from local clouds → local CR spectra • CR variations, Solar modulation • May contain signatures of exotic physics (dark matter etc.) • Cosmology, SUSY, hints for accelerator experiments • Background for point sources (positions, low latitude sources…) • Besides: • “Diffuse” emission from other normal galaxies (M31, LMC, SMC) • Cosmic rays in other galaxies ! • Foreground in studies of the extragalactic diffuse emission • Extragalactic diffuse emission (blazars ?) may contain signatures of exotic physics (dark matter, BH evaporation etc.) Calculation requires knowledge of CR (p,e) spectra in the entire Galaxy

  4. Transport Equations ~90 (no. of CR species) ψ(r,p,t) – density per total momentum sources (SNR, nuclear reactions…) diffusion convection (Galactic wind) diffusive reacceleration (diffusion in the momentum space) E-loss radioactive decay fragmentation + boundary conditions

  5. Halo Gas, sources CR Propagation: Milky Way Galaxy 1kpc ~ 3x1018cm Optical image: Cheng et al. 1992, Brinkman et al. 1993 Radio contours: Condon et al. 1998 AJ 115, 1693 100 pc NGC891 40 kpc 0.1-0.01/ccm 1-100/ccm Sun 4-12 kpc Intergalactic space R Band image of NGC891 1.4 GHz continuum (NVSS), 1,2,…64 mJy/ beam “Flat halo” model (Ginzburg & Ptuskin 1976)

  6. What it takes to model CR propagation in the Galaxy • Gas distribution (energy losses, π0, brems) • Interstellar radiation field (IC, e± energy losses) • Nuclear & particle production cross sections • Gamma-ray production: brems, IC, π0 • Energy losses: ionization, Coulomb, brems, IC, synch • Assume propagation model (Dxx, Dp, Va) • Source distribution & injection spectra • Solve transport equations for all CR species • Fix propagation parameters

  7. More Effects: Local Environment Sun • Local Bubble: • A hole in the interstellar gas is formed in a series of SN explosions; some shocks may still exist there… • May be important for radioactive CR species, but Dxx=? Sun ~200pc Regular Galactic magnetic field may establish preferential directions of CR propagation GC

  8. CR Source Distribution Lorimer 2004 Pulsars SNR source CR after propagation diffuse γ-ray distribution The CR source (SNRs, pulsars) distribution is too narrow to match the CR distribution in the Galaxy assuming XCO=N(H2)/WCO=const (CO is a tracer of H2)

  9. Distribution of CR Sources & Gradient in the CO/H2 CR distribution from diffuse gammas (Strong & Mattox 1996) SNR distribution (Case & Bhattacharya 1998) Pulsar distribution Lorimer 2004 sun XCO=N(H2)/WCO: Histo –This work, Strong et al.’04 ----- -Sodroski et al.’95,’97 1.9x1020 -Strong & Mattox’96 ~Z-1 –Boselli et al.’02 ~Z-2.5 -Israel’97,’00, [O/H]=0.04,0.07 dex/kpc

  10. Electron Fluctuations/SNR stochastic events GeV electrons 100 TeV electrons GALPROP/Credit S.Swordy Electron energy loss timescale: 1 TeV: ~300 kyr 100 TeV: ~3 kyr Energy losses Bremsstrahlung E(dE/dt)-1,yr Ionization IC, synchrotron Coulomb 107 yr 1 GeV 1 TeV 106 yr Ekin, GeV

  11. Wherever you look, the GeV -ray excess is there ! EGRET data 4a-f

  12. Diffuse g-ray emission models Cosmic Ray Spectral Variations EGRET “GeV Excess” Dark Matter from Hunter et al. ApJ (1997) from Strong et al. ApJ (2004) from de Boer et al. A&A (2005) • There are two possible BUT fundamentally different explanations of the excess, in terms of exotic and traditional physics: • Dark Matter • CR spectral variations • Both have their pros & cons. 0.5-1 GeV >0.5 GeV

  13. GeV excess: Optimized/Reaccleration model antiprotons Uses all sky and antiprotons & gammas to fix the nucleon and electron spectra • Uses antiproton flux to fix the intensity of CR nucleons @ HE • Uses gammas to adjust • the nucleon spectrum at LE • the intensity of the CR electrons (uses also synchrotron index) • Uses EGRET data up to 100 GeV Ek, GeV protons electrons x4 x1.8 Ek, GeV Ek, GeV

  14. Diffuse Gammas at Different Sky Regions Hunter et al. region: l=300°-60°,|b|<10° Outer Galaxy: l=90°-270°,|b|<10° Inner Galaxy: l=330°-30°,|b|<5° corrected Intermediate latitudes: l=0°-360°,10°<|b|<20° l=40°-100°,|b|<5° Intermediate latitudes: l=0°-360°,20°<|b|<60° Milagro

  15. Longitude Profiles |b|<5° 50-70 MeV 0.5-1 GeV 2-4 GeV 4-10 GeV

  16. Latitude Profiles: Inner Galaxy 0.5-1 GeV 2-4 GeV 50-70 MeV 4-10 GeV 20-50 GeV

  17. Latitude Profiles: Outer Galaxy 0.5-1 GeV 50-70 MeV 2-4 GeV 4-10 GeV

  18. Example “Global Fit:” diffuse γ’s, pbars, positrons GALPROP/W. de Boer et al. hep-ph/0309029 • Look at the combined (pbar,e+,γ) data • Possibility of a successful “global fit” can not be excluded -non-trivial ! Supersymmetry: • MSSM (DarkSUSY) • Lightest neutralino χ0 • mχ ≈ 50-500 GeV • S=½ Majorana particles • χ0χ0−> p, pbar, e+, e−, γ γ pbars e+

  19. Positions of the local clouds sun Pohl et al.2003 Digel et al.2001 The Excess: Clues from the Local Medium Observations of the local medium in different directions, e.g. local clouds, will provide a clue to the origin of the excess (assuming it exists). Inconclusive based on EGRET data Will GLAST see the excess? Yes No • Poor knowledge of • π0-production cross section: • better understanding of • π0-production • Dark Matter signal: • look for spectral signatures in cosmic rays (PAMELA, BESS, AMS) and in collider experiments (LHC) Possibility: cosmic-ray spectral variations. Further test: look at more distant clouds EGRET data

More Related