1 / 25

Business and Employment Law

This lecture explores the importance of the contract of employment as a strategic managerial tool, and the necessity of anticipating changes in demand, flexible roles, and drafting contracts accordingly. It also examines the formation of a contract of employment, the importance of written particulars, and the differences between express and implied terms. The duty of mutual trust and confidence is discussed, highlighting its significance in maintaining a healthy employer-employee relationship.

amandah
Download Presentation

Business and Employment Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 4: WB 11th February 2019 Express and Implied Terms Business and Employment Law

  2. Contract of Employment • Why it matters • Important strategic managerial tool- anticipate changes in demand/where work done/ need for flexible roles and draft contract accordingly. • Protect vital interests such as confidential information, length of notice, etc.

  3. Drafting Once terms are agreed they are binding and cannot be altered (or "varied") unless :- (i) the employee agrees to the change; (ii) the contract allows the employer to impose the change without consent; (iii) the contract is terminated. In the case of (iii) the employee may be able to seek compensation (see below).

  4. Formation of Contract of Employment A contract of employment can exist without being written: 230 (2) Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) But ‘written particulars’ of main terms required by ss1-8 ERA 1996 – must be given within 8 weeks of start of employment

  5. Written particulars “…provides very strong prima facie evidence of what were the terms of the contracts between parties, but does not constitute a written contract between parties” Systems Floors v Daniel [1981] IRLR 475 Browne-Wilkinson J sitting as president EAT

  6. Written particulars Breach of supplying particulars/particulars incomplete : S38 Employment Act 2002 • 2 - 4 weeks pay if employer loses a statutory claim against him and he has not given the statement of employment particulars

  7. Formation of Contract of Employment Express terms- terms to which both parties have agreed Implied terms Other possible sources e.g. staff handbooks or collective agreements, letters of appointment, ‘policies’- e.g. harassment policy

  8. Collective Bargains An agreement between a trade union and an employer benefitting employees Not itself a contract – s179 TULR(C) Act presumed not legally binding . Individual must argue the term is incorporated into his contract.

  9. Implied terms are:- (i) - terms that are too obvious too mention (eg that the employee will not steal from the employer); (ii) - those necessary to make the contract workable (eg that an employee whose contractual duties require driving must have a current driving licence) (iii)- those that are the custom and practice of the industry-evidential hurdle very high; (iv) terms imposed by law (eg the right not to be discriminated against in pay terms)

  10. Implied Terms • No requirement for the employer to act reasonably – contractual however.... • Courts will consider ‘reasonable man’ approach – the officious bystander • Mears v Safecar Security Ltd [1982] IRLR183

  11. Implied terms Inferring agreement or ‘back-door’ regulation? Implications for laissez-faire model if courts use terms for ‘fairness’ rather than ‘agreement’

  12. Modern view (i) term derived from presumed intention of parties (ii) term as a necessary incident of the relationship concerned, unless the parties have expressly excluded it- - See SocieteGenerale, London Branch v Geys[2012] UKSC 63

  13. Modern view- regulatory Thus- “the existence and scope of standardised implied terms raise questions of reasonableness, fairness and the balancing of competing policy considerations.“- per Dyson LJ in Crossley v Faithful and Gould Holdings Ltd [2004] IRLR 377 at [36]

  14. Orthodox view "In my judgment as a matter of law reliance on an express term cannot involve breach of an implied term.” -- Johnstone v. Bloomsbury Health Authority [1991] ICR 269 CA

  15. Implied Duties of Employer • Pay • Provide Work • Skilled Employees – William Hill v Tucker [1999] ICR 291 • Garden Leave

  16. Other Implied Duties • To reimburse the employee for all reasonable work related expenses • To take reasonable care of employee safety • Provide competent work colleagues • Provide adequate equipment • To provide a safe place to work • To provide a safe system of working • AND the most important implied term ……..

  17. DUTY OF MUTUAL TRUST AND CONFIDENCE Employer and employee will not conduct themselves "without reasonable and proper cause in a manner calculated and likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of confidence and trust between employer and employee" • Woods v. W M Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd [1981] IRLR 347, • Lewis v. Motorworld Garages Ltd [1985] IRLR 465 • Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v. Imperial Tobacco Ltd [1991] IRLR 66

  18. Significance of the Duty

  19. Mutual Trust and Confidence • The most important of all implied terms – examples include • RESPECT – Lewis v Motorworld Garages Ltd [1985]; • Mobility Clauses – United Bank Ltd v. Akhtar [1989] IRLR 507 • Corrupt Business – Malik v BCCI [1997] UKHL 23, • Grievance procedures- McConnell v Goold [1995]

  20. Stress at Work – can constitute a breach of MT&C • One man’s stress is another’s adrenaline • Employer entitled to believe that employee is able to cope with demands of job. • Are the indications that the employee is not coping ‘plain enough for a reasonable employer to realise that something is wrong?

  21. Stress at Work • Sutherland v Hatton [2002] • Barber v Somerset Council [2004] • Sandwell MBC v Jones [2004]

  22. Bullying at Work – another example of breach of MT&C • From name calling, singled out for less favourable treatment to physical violence • If situation becomes intolerable and no action is taken • Can lead to constructive dismissal

  23. Implied Duties of the Employee • Obedience - Pepper v Webb [1969];Wilson v Racher[1974] • Dress Codes – Schmidt; Smith v Safeway • Co-operation – Cresswell • Reasonable Care – when working/of employer equipment

  24. Implied Duties of Employee • Duty of Fidelity (faithful service) • Moonlighting for Competitors –Hivak Ltd v Park Royal (1946) • Trade Secrets • Current & former employees • Confidential Information • Current employees only – Faccenda Chicken v Fowler

  25. Implied terms v express terms Where a written term and an implied term say different things the express normally prevails. But a widely drafted written (express) term can be “limited” by an implied term: United Bank Ltd v. Akhtar[1989] IRLR 507 Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1991] ICR 269 CA

More Related