130 likes | 319 Views
Evaluation : what is it, and why do we need it ?. Prof. Jeremy Wyatt DM FRCP, Director Acknowledgments: Doug Altman & David Spiegelhalter Chuck Friedman & Trish Greenhalgh. What is evaluation ?. Describing or measuring something Entails data collection and analysis
E N D
Evaluation: what is it, and why do we need it ? Prof. Jeremy Wyatt DM FRCP, Director Acknowledgments: Doug Altman & David Spiegelhalter Chuck Friedman & Trish Greenhalgh
What is evaluation ? • Describing or measuring something • Entails data collection and analysis • Implies a set of criteria or judgements to be made • Usually with: • A purpose – making a decision, answering a question… • People (the stakeholders) in mind
Evaluation as an information-generating cycle 2. Design a study 1. Question 3. Collect data, analyse results 4. Make decision
Why evaluate ? • To learn as we go along [formative] • To ensure our systems are safe & effective, solve more problems than they create • To inform decisions made by others [summative] • To publish, add to the evidence base • To account for money spent (cover our backs) • To persuade stakeholders: health professionals, politicians, organisations, patients…
Some evaluation stakeholders Trade associations System developers System suppliers Regulators Evaluation funder System purchaser Health information system Evaluators Tax payers Academic peers Professional bodies System users Patients Users of similar systems Friends & family
Kinds of evaluation study Evaluation studies Qualitative studies Quantitative studies Measurement studies Demonstration studies Reliability studies Descriptive studies Validity studies Correlational studies Comparative studies
The politics of evaluation Society Advocates Opponents Evaluation study findings Risk takers Regulators Watch out for “fear of the clear” Laggards Innovators Practitioners Academics Public sector Private sector The media Vested interests
Does telehealth work ? UK Whole System Demonstrators - covers 6000 pts with HF, COPD, DM “If used correctly” telehealth reduced: • Death rates by 45% • NHS resource usage by 15-20% • NHS tariff costs by 8% [But how many people used it “correctly” ?]
Key Telehealth study questions Not “Does telehealth work ?” But: • Who wants telehealth ? • Who engages with telehealth ? • Who benefits from it ? • In what care pathways is it cost effective?
Why bother with evaluation – can’t we just predict the results ? No, the real word is too messy / complex: • Bike Ed - carefully designed training campaign for boys – doubled injury risk (Carlin J 1998) • Weekly exercise programme for nurses to reduce back problems - no reduction, interfered with work planning (Skargren E 1999) • Toughened glass tankards to reduce alcohol-related injuries – randomised trial in 57 bars showed 60% rise (Warburton A 2000)
Conclusion: an evaluation mindset • Be realistic: aim to be informative, not definitive • Tailor each study to the problem and resources • Collect information to address main stakeholder questions • Be: • Focused (always have a plan) • Open (to intended & unintended effects) • Flexible (prepared to change your plan) • Evaluation, like politics, is the art of the possible - so exploit opportunities, in lab and field
Workshop:Can we make evaluation of health IT part of NHS routine business?