550 likes | 635 Views
George Mason School of Law. Contracts I Paternalism I F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu. Free bargaining makes people better off…. Provided that we assume that their choices satisfy the assumptions of rational choice. Rational Choice: Six Assumptions. Full Information.
E N D
George Mason School of Law Contracts I Paternalism I F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu
Free bargaining makes people better off… • Provided that we assume that their choices satisfy the assumptions of rational choice
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices are Freely Made
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices are Freely Made • Non-satiation
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices are Freely Made • Non-satiation • Completeness or comparability
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices are Freely Made • Non-satiation • Completeness or comparability • No third party effects (externalities)
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices are Freely Made • Non-satiation • Completeness or comparability • No third party effects (externalities) • Perfect rationality
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information (later) • No mistakes • No misrepresentations • And no informational asymmetries
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices Are Freely Made (later) • No duress
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices Are Freely Made • Non-satiation • More is always better
Non-satiation: B > A Good 1 More is always better B A Good 2 0
Non-satiation: B > A Good 1 More is always better B YB A YA YB > YA Good 2 0 XA XB XB > XA
Non-SatiationIs this the same thing as saying “Greed is good”? Michael Douglas as Gordon Gekko in Wall Street
Non-SatiationHow would you define greed? Michael Douglas as Gordon Gekko in Wall Street
Is it a matter of how avidly one pursues money? Leisure Work
Is it a matter of how avidly one pursues money? Leisure Surfer ● A Scrooge McDuck ● B Work
Is it a matter of how avidly one pursues money? Leisure Just where would one put lawyers? ● A ● B Work
Is it a matter of how avidly one pursues money? Leisure Is there a golden mean? ● A ● B Work
Is what you do with the money relevant? Spending on Charity Personal Consumption
Is what you do with the money relevant? Spending on Charity Benefactor’s consumption at A ● A Greedhead’s consumption at B ● B Personal Consumption
Or is it what you pursue? Non-material Goods Material Goods 23
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices Are Freely Made • Non-satiation • Completeness or comparability
Comparability: No incommensurabilities No black holes
IncommensurabilityTragic Choices • Sophie’s Choice • You are a member of a hospital’s ethics committee. You have to choose between allocating a kidney to an alcoholic former sports idol or a mother of two.
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices are Freely Made • Non-satiation • Completeness or comparability • No third party effects (externalities)
Third party effects: Bargaining with a third person Mary Representing Ann’s utility on a third dimension. (Please put on your 3-D glasses now.) Ann Bess
Third party effects: Bargaining with a third person Mary The intersection of the three indifference curves in three dimensional space is the “bargaining core” Ann Bess
What happens if third parties can’t be joined? • Paretian norms don’t work—if it’s an external cost • Externalities and Tort Law
But nearly everything has third party effects… • Do we then abandon the concept of efficiency? • A more relaxed standard: Kaldor-Hicks efficiency • A transformation is Kaldor-Hicks efficient when the winners could compensate the losers (“Potential Pareto-Efficiency”) and satisfy Paretian standards
Examples of Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency • It is proposed to abandon steel tariffs that impose costs of $10B on the economy but provide steel manufacturers with a gain of $1B. • The bankruptcy of a failing business imposes a cost to shareholders of $1M, but provides a benefit of $5M to creditors.
Explaining Kaldor-Hicks:C is Pareto-inferior to A Moving from A to C makes Mary worse off Bess A C Mary
But C is Kaldor-Hicks Efficient to A 1. At C Bess is on IC and better off than she is at A on IA Bess A C IC IA Mary
C is Kaldor-Hicks Efficient to A 2. At C Bess could give up CB roses to move to B and be on IB, where she would still be better off than she was on IA Bess A B C IB IC IA Mary
C is Kaldor-Hicks Efficient to A 3. At B Mary would be no worse off than at A. Bess A B C IB IC IA Mary “Potential Pareto-superiority”
Kaldor-Hicks EfficiencyC is Pareto-inferior to A but Bess could make it Pareto-superior by transferring wealth to Mary Bess A B C IB IC IA Mary “Potential Pareto-superiority”
Examples of Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency • It is proposed to abandon steel tariffs that impose costs of $10B on the economy but provide steel manufacturers with a gain of $1B. • The bankruptcy of a failing business imposes a cost to shareholders of $1M, but provides a benefit of $5M to creditors.
Examples of Kaldor-Hicks InEfficiency • The bankruptcy of a failing business imposes a cost to shareholders of $10M, but provides a benefit of $5M to creditors.
Rational Choice: Six Assumptions • Full Information • Choices are Freely Made • Non-satiation • Completeness or comparability • No third party effects (externalities) • Now—Perfect rationality
Relaxing the Rationality Assumption:Transitivity: A Technical Definition • If A is preferred to B and B is preferred to C, then A is preferred to C • A}B, B}C A}C
Relaxing the Rationality Assumption:Transitivity: A Technical Definition • If A is indifferent to B and B is indifferent to C, then A is indifferent to C • AB, BC AC
Transitivity: A>B, B>C A>C Good 1 A B C Good 2 0
Transitivity: Indifference curves can’t touch If a ~ c and c~ b, then a ~ b. But b > a Good 1 A violation of transitivity b · · a · c Good 2 0
Relaxing the rationality assumption:Paternalism • Suppose that, lacking perfect rationality, we knew that our choices might harm us. • Might we not, in such cases, wish to let the paternalist choose for us?
Relaxing the rationality assumption:Byron, The Prisoner of Chillon At last Men came to set me free – I asked not why, and recked not where-- It was at length the same to me, Fettered or fetterless to be-- I learned to love despair… My very chains and I made friends, So much a long Communion tends To make us what we are, even I Regained my freedom with a sigh Castle of Chillon, Switzerland
Infants: Kiefer • What happened?
Infants: Kiefer • What happened? • The Wisconsin statute’s version of restatement § 14 referred to 21 years as the standard. • Was that dispositive? • Should it have been?
Infants: Kiefer • What about the mature 16 year old? And the immature 25 year-old? Or the married person under the age of majority? • The evidence from criminal law.
Infants: Kiefer • Did the Δ know that the Π was an emancipated minor?