490 likes | 1.53k Views
Tort Law. Summary. Tort Law. Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law It is a “wrong” which can be either Intentional or Unintentional. Intentional Tort. When a person deliberately causes harm or loss to another person.
E N D
Tort Law Summary
Tort Law • Entitles you to sue for damages in a civil court of law • It is a “wrong” which can be either Intentional or Unintentional.
Intentional Tort • When a person deliberately causes harm or loss to another person. • Examples: Battery; Trespassing; Damaging a person’s reputation; false imprisonment.
Intent • Intent is the most important element of Intentional Tort. • Intent is the true purpose of an act and the person’s hope and desire for a result of an act. • Example: Jim punches Don in the nose; harm is clearly intended.
Unintentional Tort • Anyone who carelessly injures a person, or a person’s property, should compensate the victim for that injury. • Someone must actually be injured by the careless conduct.
Negligence • Negligence is an important area of Tort Law and has three characteristics: • 1. Action is unintentional • 2. Action is unplanned • 3. Injury occurs as a result of the action
The Elements of Negligence • Duty of Care • In a Negligence suit, the plaintiff must show that the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care. • When legal duty has been placed upon you, you have a duty of care. • Your actions must not cause harm to people or their property.
Breach of Duty of Care • Defendant fails to meet the expected standard of care of a “reasonable person.” • Reasonable Person – an image of a person who has neither physical, nor developmental, disabilities and who people agree is careful, thoughtful, and considerate of other people in all dealings. • NEVER EXPECTED TO BE PERFECT!
Breach of Duty of Care cont’d … • A person, or company, whose conduct falls below the expected standard of care is liable for the results of the negligence.
Minors and Duty of Care • Child cannot be judged by the standards of an adult “reasonable person.” • No legislation that clearly outlines the tort liability of minors • Children under 7yrs. seldom held liable for negligence • Duty of Care expected from reasonable children of a similar age. • Minors involved in adult activities are expected to meet the adult standards of care. E.g.: driving a car.
Foreseeability • “Would a reasonable person in similar circumstances have foreseen the injury to the victim as a result of his/her actions?” • If yes, fault and liability exists; if no, no liability.
Causation • Once established that the defendant breached the required standard of care, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant’s negligent conduct caused the plaintiff’s harm. • Example: Ben failed to shovel the snow from his sidewalk and Jennifer fell and broke her ankle – this is called causation, without it liability for negligence does not exist. • The court must then decide how direct the connection was between the action and injury.
Actual Harm or Loss • The plaintiff must prove that real harm occurred because of the defendant’s negligence.