1 / 17

ANTIMATTER Didsbury Scibar May 25 th 2009

ANTIMATTER Didsbury Scibar May 25 th 2009. Roger Barlow. Antimatter – the hype. Matter – the electron. Discovered over 100 years ago Still one of the fundamental ‘elementary particles’ Properties known very well: Mass 9.109382 10 -13 kg Charge -1.6021765 10 -19 C Radius Zero (?).

amber-ryan
Download Presentation

ANTIMATTER Didsbury Scibar May 25 th 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ANTIMATTERDidsbury ScibarMay 25th 2009 Roger Barlow

  2. Antimatter – the hype

  3. Matter – the electron Discovered over 100 years ago Still one of the fundamental ‘elementary particles’ Properties known very well: Mass 9.109382 10-13 kg Charge -1.6021765 10-19C Radius Zero (?) Commonplace yet mysterious Just as ‘fundamental’ as quarks, gluons, Higgs bosons… Also an everyday object – electronics, electricity, atomic physics… e

  4. Paul Dirac (1902-1984) Dirac Equation Deduced from aesthetics. Explains the magnetic behaviour of the electron and links it to its electrical behaviour But …..

  5. Dirac’s “unwanted” answers The equation always gives two solutions. - Sensible solution. With positive energy. E.g. E=½mv2 - Crazy solution. With negative energy. E.g. E=-½mv2 Basically it gives E2. Which has positive and negative roots. What next? • Reject the equation • Ignore crazy solutions • Take them seriously

  6. Think it through… + charged - charged Ordinary electron travelling left to right Attracted by the + plate, repelled by the - plate Picks up energy. E=½mv2 Goes faster. Anomalous electron travelling left to right Picks up energy. E= -½mv2 Goes slower Behaves as if it were repelled by the + plate attracted by the – plate Battery

  7. It’s always the same ‘Negative energy’ electrons behave like ordinary electrons with the opposite charge. Another particle (or just another aspect of the basic particle) The Positron or Anti-electron • Mass 9.109382 10-13 kg • Charge +1.6021765 10-19C • Radius Zero (?) Properties exactly the same (or exactly opposite)

  8. Plenty of positrons High energy photons (MeVγrays) produce electrons and positrons in pairs. Lots in cosmic ray showers Some nuclei βdecay by emitting a positron 22Na  22Ne + e++ ν Also 11C, 13N, 15O, 18F Half lives of minutes

  9. Positrons at work: PET scanning Positron Emission Tomography • Prepare biologically interesting chemical with positron emitting nucleus (e.g. FDG – like glucose) • Inject patient. Molecules move to sites where needed • Nucleus decays giving positron • Positron encounters electron and ‘annihilates’ to 2 photons, emitted back to back • Photons are detected externally. The decay ocurred somewhere along the line joining them • Collect more data and get 3D map

  10. What about other particles? • protons, neutrons, quarks … • Yes, they all have their antiparticle equivalents: • Antiprotons, antineutrons, antiquarks… • Often denoted by a line (bar) above: p • Hence the experiment to study B and B particles • All properties exactly the same or exactly opposite • Only antielectrons have their own special name

  11. From antiparticles to Antimatter • Hydrogen • Antihydrogen Straightforward to make: Make antiprotons. (1M protons at 1 GeV give ~25 antiprotons) Make positrons. (easier). Combine them. Worth studying to see if properties really are the same as Hydrogen Very hard/impossible to store P e P e

  12. Matter meets antimatter • If a particle meets its antiparticle: • Total charge (etc) is 0 • Combine to give lots of gamma rays (‘annihilation’) Isn’t that dangerous? 1 gm of antimatter + 1 gm matter 2mc2=1.8 1014J (A days output for a large power station) But to make that gram you need – many days output from a large power station

  13. Frequently Asked Questions Are there antiphotons? No. Or rather: the antiphoton is exactly the same as the photon so there isn’t a separate species. What about antineutrons? Antineutrinos? Yes. Although these are neutral so their antiparticles have the same charge (-0=0) they have other properties which are different. Do antiparticles mean antigravity? No. Apples and antiapples both fall downwards What about anti-antiparticles? These are the original particles

  14. Another question Why is the universe full of matter and empty of antimatter? If positrons and electrons are equal, why aren’t there equal numbers of both around? (Just as well!) Maybe distant galaxies are made of antimatter? Looks like not.

  15. Equal numbers of particles and antiparticles An imbalance develops, ~1000000001 particles to 999999999 antiparticles Most particles annihilate with antiparticles leaving the residue

  16. What was that difference? We don’t know! This is one of the big 3 questions of particle physics There are small differences in the behaviour of Kaons. A K0 will decay to e+π - or to e-π + . The rates are slightly different (0.3%). • This was explained by Kobayashi and Maskawa • Their theory also predicts similar effects with B particles • Predictions are spot on – Nobel prize for K and M • These are not big enough to account for the matter/antimatter domination.

  17. Antimatter • Part of our understanding of the universe • But we still don’t understand everything

More Related