1 / 17

Effect of Self-Determination Theory on Increasing Physical Activity in the Community

This study analyzes how Self-Determination Theory (SDT) compared to related interventions affects the increase of physical activity in the community. Strategies include social marketing, communication strategies, individual counseling, working with organizations, and environmental change strategies.

amcnatt
Download Presentation

Effect of Self-Determination Theory on Increasing Physical Activity in the Community

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How does Self-Determination Theory compared to related interventions, affect increase physical activity in the community? NatalieGjerstad, JusztinaKovács, Orsolya Dóra Dankó, Žan Pudgar

  2. Justforfun • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOKP0wgDftQ • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgSMxY6asoE

  3. PICO • P: random population/community • I: SDT (Self-DeterminationTheory), containstheimportant of individualneedingsofmotivationstodophysicalactivities • C:incomperisontorelatedinterventions • O: increase of physicalactivity

  4. SuitableStrategies • Social marketing through local mass media (TV, radio, newspaper). • Other communication strategies (posters, flyers, information booklets, web sites, maps).

  5. Individual counselling by health professionals. • Workingwith voluntary, government, andnon-government organisations, including sporting clubs, to encourage participation in walking, other activities, and events.

  6. Working within specific settings such as schools, workplaces, agedcarecentres,communitycentres,homelessshelters,andshopping malls. This may include settings that provide an opportunity to reach disadvantaged persons. • Environmental change strategies such as creation of walkingtrailsandinfrastructurewithlegislative,fiscal,policyrequirements and planning (having ecological validity) for the broader population.

  7. Self-determinationtheory • Twokind of motivation • Threephysicalneeds • Autonomy • Relatedness • Competence • Context of helathbehaviorwitgchanging PA • Just PA  brush teeth, wear seat belt not too autonom • Motivational determinants + SDT  powerful  can change a lot of thing

  8. Intrinsic motivation – most important • Highestlevel of SDT – couldincrease PA

  9. Comparison (I.) • Review number one - 25 included trials, as opposed to three included trials in review number two. • Results: Effects measured in the reviews vary • Probable bias not addressed in the second review

  10. Comparison (II.) • Interventions --> A more narrow approach. • Formalities, included/excluded trials, search terms ++ • Is the second review reliable?

  11. References: • Baker PRA, Foster CE, Francis DP, SoaresJ, WeightmanA(2011) Cochranedatabase of systematicreviews 12/2011 • Fortier et al. 2012. Promotingphysicalactivity: development and testing of self-determinationtheory-basedinterventions. International Journal of BehavioralNutrition and PhysicalActivity2012, 9:20

  12. Thankyouforyourattention!

More Related