1 / 52

Supply-Based Regional Growth Analysis

Supply-Based Regional Growth Analysis. Chapter 8. Solow (1956) Swan (1956). Y = f (K, L,  ) Y, K, and L are the levels of output, capital, and labor K and L are equally productive everywhere Constant returns to scale Level of technical progress, , is available everywhere

amelie
Download Presentation

Supply-Based Regional Growth Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Supply-Based Regional Growth Analysis Chapter 8 1

  2. Solow (1956) Swan (1956) • Y = f(K, L, ) • Y, K, and L are the levels of output, capital, and labor • K and L are equally productive everywhere • Constant returns to scale • Level of technical progress, , is available everywhere • Rate of return to capital=interest rate • MPL = wage in the perfectly competitive market 2

  3. Solow (1956) Swan (1956) • Growth occurs • When amount of resources increase • Technology shifts the production function upward • Spatial misallocation of resources is corrected (spatial mismatch) • “Technology” is measured as the residual after explaining growth due to other production factors. (between 1929 and 1982: > 33%) 3

  4. Production function 4

  5. Neoclassical wage equilibration via capital migration 5

  6. Neoclassical wage equilibration via labor migration 6

  7. Catch-up • Low-wage regions would see a faster increase in growth rates and wage rates than higher-wage areas. • Free trade and migration should induce low-income regions to catch up and converge with high-income areas. • Restricted trade and migration should result in diverging economies. 7

  8. Convergence: a reality? • Few empirical studies have established a convergence process. • Santa Clara County, California, average annual wage per job was $69,288 (2004) • Garfield Co., (eastern Montana) lower land prices and an average wage $17,012 (2004) 8

  9. Convergence: a reality? • In neoclassical growth theory, differences in per capita income and growth rates across regions cannot persist without market interference • If it works for countries: what about states? Counties? Cities? Census tracts? Households? 9

  10. Solow Residual • Amount of growth that is not explained by the quantity of inputs (the residual of the regression equation) is a measure of technological innovation. • Knowledge and ideas are never generated. They show up instantly everywhere like manna from heaven. 10

  11. Solow Residual • No learning curve needed, but … • Workers can neither modify nor recreate the existing technology • Agglomeration economies, technological spillovers, or entrepreneurial ability have no role in growth. 11

  12. Role of Government • Neoclassical theory often masks a moral requirement that low-income areas should grow faster. • Taxes should be levied on the developed regions and used to assist growth in low-income areas. • But, taxes reduce employment in developed regions. • Spending crowds out private sector. 12

  13. Endogenous Growth theory • Romer’s (1986): Output = f(Capital, Labor, and Knowledge). • Modifies Solow/Swan growth model. • Diminishing marginal productivities for capital and labor; but the marginal product of knowledge is increasing. • Once we have a certain stock of knowledge, doubling inputs devoted to research does not double the amount of new knowledge. 13

  14. Endogenous Growth theory • But: • There is no automatic equilibrating mechanism that requires low-income areas to grow faster than developed areas. • Convergence is not necessary. • Growth in some regions can be slower than in others or even stagnant. • Growth is a function of: externalities, increasing (or constant) returns to scale, decreasing returns to producing new knowledge. 14

  15. Endogenous Growth theory • Input and output markets are not necessarily perfectly competitive. • Most endogenous growth models assume some form of production based on: • Technology and innovation, • Unskilled and skilled labor, • Physical capital • Infrastructure and public services. 15

  16. Technology and innovation • Labor can flow from unskilled to skilled markets, with a time lag. • Investments in human capital mean constant learning. • Physical capital incorporates the latest technology. 16

  17. Infrastructure • Physical infrastructure • Provision and maintenance of utilities, roads, highways, bridges, mail, telecommunications. • Social infrastructure • Existence and respect for property rights as well as nonobstructive bureaucracies. 17

  18. Government • Provide and maintain infrastructure • Enforce property rights. 18

  19. Technology • The saving force. How? • Deskilling of jobs (process innovations ) • Requires higher skills (product innovations ) • Employment could (simultaneously) increase, decrease, or remain stable if firms adapt newest technology 19

  20. Innovation • Using knowledge to invent and introduce a new product, process, or service into the marketplace. • Classification: • the ratio of its spending on research and development to its total sales, or • the industry’s ratio of research and development employment to total employment. • Firms that innovate grow faster • innovations cause more rapid growth or • the faster-growing firms have a greater ability to innovate 20

  21. Knowledge, Innovation, and Technological Progress • The more that is known, the easier it is to invent and discover even more. • engineering and chemistry • Highly innovative regions increase the technological gap. • Imitation and diffusion reduce technology gaps 21

  22. Public goods • Nonrivalry: several people can use the same good simultaneously. Nonexcludability: it is difficult to prohibit people from using the good. • Romer (1996): Technology is a set of ideas combined with “physical things” and used in production. • An idea (knowledge) is a nonrival good, but the physical things are rival goods. 22

  23. Dual continuum showing Pure Private and Pure public goods 23

  24. A Firm’s Investment in Private R&D • Expected rate of return on research and development • Has to be at least equal to the expected rate of return of another project 24

  25. How Does Knowledge Spill Over • Knowledge is exchanged among people in the same industry (localization economies), or • Among industries in geographic proximity (urbanization economies). • By sharing inputs, backward linkages facilitate innovation in decreasing the cost of using new ideas. 25

  26. Geographic concentration? • Perroux (1950) no. Input suppliers need not even be on the same continent to be influential: hard to create policy • Boudeville (1966) spatial proximity and agglomeration economies are fundamental for innovation. • But innovators, research institutions, and a highly trained workforce must all interact to maintain a viable, dependable network. 26

  27. Collaboration • Innovative milieu,industrial district, technopole, science park • Goal: Recreate Silicon Valley. • Milieu: industrial culture that promotes collective learning • Knowledge must be acquired, maintained, and reproduced. • “Creative forgetting” allows technical change to progress. 27

  28. Human Capital and Technical Change • Improvements in productivity come from • Advances in physical technology integrated in newer capital, • Increases in the stock of knowledge bridge building, and • Incorporation of human capital in individual workers. • Brooklyn Bridge took 14 years (1869-1883) • Verrazano-Narrows Bridge: 5 years (1959-1964) 28

  29. Brooklyn Bridge 29

  30. Verrazano–Narrows Bridge 30

  31. Human Capital • Theodore Schultz (1963) • Health care, *education, job search time, job search costs (newspapers, agencies, moving), on–the–job training (learning -by-doing), job tenure. 31

  32. Measures of Formal Education • Enrollment rates proportion of school age children enrolled in school at the beginning of the academic year. • Should predict the future stock of human capital. • Does not account for students who leave or choose not to work after graduation. 32

  33. Measures of Formal Education • Literacy rate represents a basic level of human capital acquired by individuals at a point in time. • How to effectively test? • For the US, in 18% of the households English is not the primary language • Proficiency in the primary language of a region increases productivity and potential earnings (statistically significant). 33

  34. Measures of Formal Education • Average educational attainment • Assumes workers with the same level of education possess the same skills. (All Master’s degrees create the same skills.) • Murphy, Shleifer, and Vishny (1991): A 10% increase in the average educational attainment leads to an average 8% increase in a state’s aggregate output. 34

  35. Rates of Return to an Investment in Education • 80% for elementary school in low-income countries to - 3% for some grad degrees • Quality preschool: 7% and 16%. • Bachelor’s degree at 8% • Graduate degree 7% to 12% (average) • Society’s RoR: individuals do not consider the positive externalities  they underinvest 35

  36. Education • Learn cognitive skills. • Self-reliance and dynamism • More patient toward bureaucracies • Comply more with organizational rules, Easier to train. • Employers use to screen workers. Signals ability, achievement, motivation, and ethnic/social origin. 36

  37. Social capital • Network of informal social relations, family and community connections, common values, and respect for norms • Encourages information spillovers • Becomes an informal safety net 37

  38. Social capital • Includes all elements necessary to determine how the community shapes its own destiny • How to adapt to a climate and a community, • The workings of local networks • The identification of the true decision maker • Social capital produces positive and negative effects on a community. • Reciprocity is expected. The more “social debts” a person holds, the more social capital is available. (influence) • “Old-boy networks,” intolerance against “outsiders” limit knowledge dissemination. 38

  39. Social Mindset and Growth • Easterlin (1981) (Economic historian) • Colonialism, absolute monarchy, the Roman Catholic Church, and Islamic fundamentalism deter mass schooling and the free circulation of ideas. • Protestantism and Humanism scientific progress, pure reason, and the conviction that humanity is master of its own destiny positively influence economic growth. 39

  40. Social mindset • Incomes in poorer regions cannot converge if they lack human capital, and if they are resigned that this is their fate. • More productive individuals need to work with other high-skilled workers. • An insufficient market for skilled labor creates a brain drain. 40

  41. Role of Capital • Tangible, physical capital • Increasing “plant” means expanding existing firms or attracting new ones. • Attracting new firms implies technological investment— • New capital embodies new technology (Arrow’s (1962) vintage model of capital) 41

  42. Types of depreciation • Physical depreciation, (wear and tear). • Obsolescence. • Reduced demand for outmoded product. 42

  43. Theory of creative destruction • Schumpeter’s (1962) • Innovating entrepreneurs lead the most important firms. • Competitive, dynamic environment, relentless innovation, they continuously create disequilibrium. 43

  44. Theory of creative destruction • New technologies are superimposed on the top of past technology, and combined with the most avant-garde technologies. • Future technologies threaten economic profits (rents) created by current research. 44

  45. Theory of creative destruction • The temptation to curtail future research to protect a process of production creates a no-growth trap. • No research, no innovations. • Economy stagnates. • Entrepreneurs decide what innovations to adapt 45

  46. Firm Births • Urbanization and localization economies • Presence of small, specialized firms • Persistently high unemployment rates (unemployment desperation.) (high probability these won’t survive) 46

  47. Innovation and firm size • Old mass-production “Fordist” firms (rust belt) less likely to innovate • Internal labor markets—few new ideas • Innovating employees leave or succumb to corporate mindset • Out-dated plant and equipment • Original location may no longer be cost minimizing • Unions set a regional minimum wage so that start-ups cannot successfully bid for workers. 47

  48. Innovation and firm size • The existence of many small manufacturing firms means the social structure fosters an entrepreneurial spirit and facilitates start-ups • Small businesses outperform large ones in industries dominated by technical change 48

  49. Foreign Direct Investment • “Foreign” means ownership by investors based outside the country or anyone from outside a locality owning local capital • Two ways it takes place: • Parent firm builds an entirely new branch in the area (Greenfield investment), or • Parent firm acquires existing facilities. 49

  50. Foreign Direct Investment • Two theories • Internalization theory, a parent firm invests in foreign assets instead of assets in its own region when the host region offers an advantage not available in the home region. (Greenfield investments) • Network theory, a parent firm tries to acquire complementary assets by expanding their networks. (Purchase existing plant) 50

More Related