1 / 31

Paper Presentation - Micropolygon Ray Tracing With Defocus and Motion Blur -

Paper Presentation - Micropolygon Ray Tracing With Defocus and Motion Blur -. Qiming Hou, Hao Qin, Wenyao Li, Baining Guo, Kun Zhou Presenter : Jong Hyeob Lee 2010. 10. 28. Micropolygon. What is a micropolygon? Polygon Micropolygon.

amiel
Download Presentation

Paper Presentation - Micropolygon Ray Tracing With Defocus and Motion Blur -

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Paper Presentation - Micropolygon Ray Tracing With Defocus and Motion Blur - Qiming Hou, Hao Qin, Wenyao Li, Baining Guo, Kun Zhou Presenter : Jong Hyeob Lee 2010. 10. 28

  2. Micropolygon • What is a micropolygon? Polygon Micropolygon

  3. Defocus and Motion Blur

  4. Rasterization vs Ray Tracing • Tracing a ray is slower than rasterizing a pixel. • Every ray returns something useful. Rasterization waste time on not-covered or occluded pixels. • Tradeoff between per-operation cost and useful operation percentage. • Stochastic sampling favors ray tracing.

  5. Goal • A 4D micropolygon ray tracing • Performs up to an order of magnitude faster than rasterization. • Eliminates the quality-performance tradeoff in defocus and motion blur rendering.

  6. Related Works • Micropolygon • Reyes [Cook et al. 1987] • RenderAnts [Zhou et al. 2009] • Defocus and Motion Blur • Adaptive sampling [Hachisuka et al. 2008] • Hyper-trapezoids • Collision detection [Hubbard 1995]

  7. Overview • Hyper-trapezoid • BVH Construction • Ray Generation • BVH Traversal

  8. Overview • Hyper-trapezoid • BVH Construction • Ray Generation • BVH Traversal

  9. Hyper-trapezoid • A hyper-trapezoid is… • Two faces at T=0, T=1 interpolated linearly across T

  10. Hyper-trapezoid • Axis-aligned bound box & Bounding box based hyper-trapezoid

  11. Hyper-trapezoid • 4D OBB hyper-trapezoids • The T=0 and T=1 faces are 3D OBB, analogous to 3D Hyper-trapezoids with 2D Bouding Box faces. T=1 T=0

  12. Comparisons with AABB • Test scenes (Furball, Ladybug, Fairy, Car)

  13. Comparisons with AABB

  14. Overview • Hyper-trapezoid • BVH Construction • Ray Generation • BVH Traversal

  15. BVH Construction • Basic topology is the same as general BVH.

  16. BVH Construction • Build process • Top level BVH • In-grid level BVH • Compute bounding volume

  17. BVH Construction • Top level BVH • Unit : Micropolygon grid • Split strategy : Surface Area Heuristic • Termination criterion : One gird in every node

  18. BVH Construction • In-grid level BVH • Unit : Micropolygons • Split strategy : Parametric space mid-split • Termination criterion : Less than 8 micropolygons in a node

  19. BVH Construction • Compute bounding volume • Compute grid-level orientation • Bottom-up merge : use the orientation that results in smaller surface area. • Top-down simplify : use parent node’s orientation if surface area isn’t increased too much.

  20. Overview • Hyper-trapezoid • BVH Construction • Ray Generation • BVH Traversal

  21. Ray Generation • Reducing the alias • Lens permutation : magic square • Time permutation : magic square shuffled and shifted per-pixel

  22. Overview • Hyper-trapezoid • BVH Construction • Ray Generation • BVH Traversal

  23. BVH Traversal – Ray and OBB • Transforming rays into per-box local frame.

  24. BVH Traversal – Ray and OBB • Transforming rays into per-box local frame.

  25. BVH Traversal - Micropolygon • Use a rasterization-like method to compute pseudo-intersections for micropolygons. • Project micropolygon to view plane. • Use even-odd rule to test it.

  26. Comparison with Rasterization • Better quality

  27. Comparisons with AABB • Test scenes (Furball, Ladybug, Fairy, Car)

  28. Comparison with Rasterization • Faster sampling time

  29. Result – Total rendering time

  30. Conclusion • The first time ray tracing is faster than rasterizaion. • A novel acceleration structure based on oriented hypertrapezoid. • Limitation : • Inefficiency of transparency handling • The BVH is not effective when tracing rays inside objects over rasterization methods.

  31. Q&A • Thank you.

More Related