310 likes | 470 Views
Climate change, land use and forests in India: research and institutional framework in the context of the Indo-US flux programme. R. Sukumar & N.H.Ravindranath Centre for Ecological Sciences Indian Institute of Science Bangalore. Obligations under UNFCCC.
E N D
Climate change, land use and forests in India: research and institutional framework in the context of the Indo-US flux programme R. Sukumar & N.H.Ravindranath Centre for Ecological Sciences Indian Institute of Science Bangalore
Obligations under UNFCCC • Periodic report of greenhouse gas emissions inventory from all sectors including land use sectors such as forests, grassland, wetlands, etc • Assess the vulnerability of natural ecosystems and socioeconomic systems to projected climate change • Report the steps taken to address climate change (mitigation, adaptation)
Forests & Climate Change • Forests play a critical role in global carbon cycle • Forests contribute about 20% of global CO2 emissions • Forest ecosystems are vulnerable to projected climate change • Likely to have adverse impacts on forest biodiversity and biomass production • Thus need to assess impacts and develop adaptation strategies • Forests provide mitigation opportunity to stabilize GHG concentration in the atmosphere, along with significant co-benefits • Mitigation through forest sector has been a contentious issue in climate negotiations
GHG Emissions from forest sector • Global emissions of carbon = 7 GtC • Emissions from LUCF = 1.6 to 1.7 GtC 1 • Tropical deforestation = 13 to 15 Mha annually • Land use change is the dominant factor in tropical countries
ESTIMATES OF STOCKS AND FLUXES FROM INDIAN FORESTS Fig 1: Estimates of C-stock from Indian forests Fig 2: C-flux estimates from Indian forests (Sources: 1880: Richard and Flint, 1994; 1980-Richard and Flint, 1994; 1986:Ravindranath et al., 1997; 1986:Chhabra and Dadhwal, 2004; 1994:Haripriya, 2003; 2005:FAO, 2005) (Sources: 1986-Ravindranath et al., 1997; 1986:Chhabra and Dadhwal, 2004; 1990 – ALGAS (ADB)., 1999; 1994:Haripriya, 2003; 1994: NATCOM, 2004)
GAPS IN C FLUX ESTIMATES • Estimation of CO2 emissions are based on • Different methods • Different sources of data • Different C –pools • Different years Thus the estimates are not comparable Uncertainties are high Periodic spatial data, forest-type wise, lacking for flux estimates
C - Inventory process requires information pertaining to activity data (i.e. land area change statistics) and impact of land use change on the C stock dynamics. • C stock dynamics under different land use change systems is poorly understood.
MITIGATION POTENTIAL OF LULUCF SECTOR 60 – 87 Gt C (cumulative) 1.09 – 1.58 Gt C (annual) Projections for mitigation potential for the period 1995 to 2050 Brown et al. 1996, 1999; IPCC 2001
Climate change impact studies at IISc • Evaluate and select models to assess climate impacts on forests • Regional Climate Model; • Vegetation Response Model; • Assess impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems at national level • Assess impacts on biodiversity and socio-economic systems through case studies • Analyze policy implications of climate impacts • Strategies for future • Research; modeling and database • Adaptation strategies
SELECTION OF VEGETATION MODEL • Equilibrium models: BIOME 3 • Dynamic model: HYBRID 4.2 • BIOME3 used due to input data limitations for the HYBRID Model
CLIMATE DATA FOR BIOMES Model used: Hadley Centre Regional Model; Had RM3 Mean monthly temp. & rainfall, cloud cover Scale: 0.44 x 0.44 degree RCM grid Scenarios: SRES; A2 and B2 Period:2071-2100 mid period: 2085 Observed Climate data:CRU data set for 1901-1995 from East Anglia (0.5x0.5 degree grid)
Projections of seasonal surface air temperature for the period 2041-60, based on the regional climate model HadRM2. Source: IITM Pune Natcom
Projections of seasonal precipitation for the period 2041-60, based on the regional climate model HadRM2. Source: IITM Pune Natcom
Potential impact on forest biomes (B-2 scenario)
Percentage of grids under different forest types undergoing change in A2 and B2 GHG scenarios
Climate impacts on NPP; % Forest biome-RCM grids subjected to change in NPP under GHG scenario over the current scenario under B2 Scenario
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS Had RM3 Model outputs using SRES: A2 and B2 scenarios & BIOME3 show; • Over 85% of forest grids will undergo changes in forest type (similar trend using Had RM2) • Regional assessment shows; • Higher impact on Savanna biomes, Teak and Sal forests of central and east, temperate biomes of Himalayas • Lower impact on Western ghats and North-east; Evergreen biomes • Large (potential) increase in Net primary productivity - 70% (B2) to 100% (A2)
GAPS IN UNDERSTANDING CURRENT STATUS • Large uncertainty in climate and vegetation response models; • regional climate level • equilibrium vegetation model • Inadequate or lack of data for the models • Adaptation not incorporated in impact models
Location of the Mudumalai 50 ha Forest Dynamics Plot Location of Mudumalai WLS
Detailed studies on the forest community Over 50000 individuals from 250+ species monitored
Canopy trees: Average growth rates per size class during 3 intervals
Basal area changes (m2 /ha) 1988 = 24.4 1992 = 24.8 1996 = 24.7 2000 = 25.9 2004 = 25.5 Carbon stocks probably increased to a greater degree because of shift from lower wood density to higher wood density species
SCIENTIFIC DATA NEEDS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE AND LANDUSE AND LANDUSE CHANGE RESEARCH • Flux programme should ideally complement “on the ground” studies on soils and vegetation • Spatial data on land use, landuse changes & forests (partly available) • Data on carbon stocks and fluxes under different land use and landuse change systems (lacking) • Spatial data on soil, water and plant physiological functions (limited availability) • Flux programme should thus network with institutions in order to extract maximum scientific understanding of C dynamics from the soil, through vegetation to the atmosphere
Networking on Institutions • Land use systems – NRSA, IRS, ISRO, SAC & FSI • Vegetation carbon flux - IISc, KFRI, ICFRE, NHU, BHU, etc • Soil carbon flux – NBSSLUP, ICAR institutes, Agric. Univ • Climate data – IITM, IISc, IMD • Modeling of fluxes – IISc, IITM, IIT,
National Coordination • DST • Dedicated institution?? • Regional lead institutions – Research area • Networking of all institutions • Funding • DST, MoEF, ICAR, ICFRE • External funding Linking with endusers such as – MoEF, ICAR, research institutions