200 likes | 676 Views
Manual Vs Instrumental Phaco. Dr. Navin Gupta M.S. (Ophthal). SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY. Main objective in modern cataract surgery Better unaided visual acuity Rapid post-op surgical recovery Minimal surgery related complications Achieved by reducing the incision size .
E N D
Manual Vs Instrumental Phaco Dr. Navin Gupta M.S. (Ophthal)
SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY • Main objective in modern cataract surgery • Better unaided visual acuity • Rapid post-op surgical recovery • Minimal surgery related complications Achieved by reducing the incision size
TECHNIQUE OF MANUAL SICS • Scleral tunnel • Corneal valve incision • AC entry with keratome • Capsulotomy & Hydrodissection • Prolapse of nucleus into AC • Nucleus delivery with irrigating vectis • I/A of cortex • IOL implantation
TECHNIQUE OF PHACOEMULSIFICATION • Scleral tunnel • Corneal valve incision • AC entry with keratome • Capsulotomy & Hydrodissection (Capsulorrhexis) • Divide & conquer or phaco chop technique • I/A of cortex • IOL implantation
INDICATIONS • Universally applicable to all cataracts • Ideal in following cases • Following RD / Vitrectomy procedures • Glaucoma • Traumatic Cataracts • Patients with Colobomas
CONTRA-INDICATIONS Mainly relative • Black cataracts • Brown cataracts • Deep sockets • Small hyperopic eyes • Small pupil /PXF • Subluxated / dislocated lens
Manual SICS - Learning curve • Easier and shorter • Rhexis or can-opener capsulotomy • Hydrodissection not mandatory • Minimal risk of nucleus drop • Hand- foot coordination not required • Single -handed technique
Phaco- Learning curve • Tougher & longer • Rhexis is a must • Hydrodissection is important • Risk of nuclear drop common • Hand foot coordination is necessary • Mostly two handed technique
MANUAL SICS - INSTRUMENTATION • Non-machine dependent technique • Needs only a simple irrigating vectis or a spatula
PHACOEMULSIFICATION- INSTRUMENTATION • Money / Machine dependent technique • Technical knowledge of machine parameters must • Parameters are different for different machines • Training of OT paramedical staff
Manual SICS - Cost effectiveness • No machine cost • No cost of reusables • Requires less fluids and viscoelastics • High volume cheaper than ECCE
Phacoemulsification-Cost effectiveness • Machine cost • Cost of consumables eg. Phaco tip, sleeve tubing, probe • Requires more fluid and viscoelastics • Problems of machine failure
Average time of surgery Manual SICS – 4 to 8 mts • Not influenced by nucleus hardness PE technique - 12 to 15 mts • Dependent on type of cataract
Turnover of cases / hour • Phacoemulsification - 4 to 5 cases • Manual SICS - 14 to 15 cases Ideal for large volume conversion
SURGICALLY INDUCED ASTIGMATISM • SIA between MSICS and Phaco with rigid IOL - not statistically significant
Conclusion Manual SICS offers all the advantages of Phacoemulsification • Less induced astigmatism • Faster stabilisation of final refraction • Less tendency towards ATR shift • Comfortable postoperative period
CONCLUSION Manual SICS is superior to phacoemulsification • Easier to learn • Cost effective • Not machine dependent • Short procedure • Postoperative results comparable to PE • Ideal alternative to ECCE with IOL for large volume surgery