1 / 8

Do we make the most of Masters projects/dissertations?

Do we make the most of Masters projects/dissertations?. Mike Collins Visiting Professor , UoG Studying Sports Development Brunel University 25-6 th April 2008. Masters projects/ dissertations. Hypothesis

amory
Download Presentation

Do we make the most of Masters projects/dissertations?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Do we make the most of Masters projects/dissertations? Mike Collins Visiting Professor , UoG Studying Sports Development Brunel University 25-6th April 2008

  2. Masters projects/ dissertations • Hypothesis That Masters students can produce original work of publishable quality, especially when working in groups Case Study 1: Live group research projects Loughborough 197- 88 Case study 2: Masters theses working collaboratively

  3. Case Study 1 ‘Live’ group research • Groupwork for live clients 1995-2004 (Collins, 2002) including • LAs – Leicester (tourist image, leisure provision for disabled), Sefton & Aylesbury Vale (leisure Cards), Leics (readiness for Active Sport), Charnwood ( SD strategy 1 & 2) • Governing bodies - ASA (Swim 21 club audit 1 & 2, swimming for ethnic minority children), RFU (rugby union in HE) • Loughborough Sport Development Centre (service provision,Healthy campus)

  4. Live group research - process • 1 gains client (previous year) – MFC trawls for partners respond to approaches/agree aims –for semester 2 • 2 confirms aims - familiarisation visit- students organise chair/teams, do lit review/ methodology - agreed with client • 3 do fieldwork –counts/observations, on-street /site visitor and management interviews, focus groups -by Easter? • 4 do analysis and write up –before exams?!! • 5 present draft report + exec summary, powerpoint presentation to client • 6 (MFC) edits report for client, sometimes presents to members/ Directorate 200 hours; 60% group mark (75% peer, 25% tutor assessment) 40% essay 2500 words of self-reflection on performance and implication of project for policy/practice/methods

  5. Live project- Learning outcomes

  6. Masters theses: working in groups Why do sports social science tutors accept any proposals from any field? Benefits of grouping; • save tutor/marking time • learning together- shared or combined methodologies • better lit. reviews/ data • offer limited range linked to your research plan • can get live clients (start 6 months early!) • low risk way of getting known and into research • get data that can be consolidated into publishable articles

  7. Masters theses working individually or in groups • Eg 1 Mintzberg configurations in LA evolution (Collins,1997) • Eg 2 Managing LA golf courses (Collins & Mort, 2001) • Eg 3 Champion Coaching in Notts for participation (Collins and Buller, 2000) and performance (Collins and Buller, 2003)

  8. References • Collins, M.F. (1997) Does changing the philosophy change the structures? Managing Leisure: an International Journal 2.4, 204-16 • Collins, M.F. and Buller, J.R. (2000) Bridging the post-school institutional gap in sport: Evaluating Champion Coaching in Nottinghamshire Managing Leisure5 200-21 • Collins, M.F. and Mort, J. (2001) Municipal golf in England: Exploring performance indicators for local authorities Managing Leisure 6, 220-43 • Collins, M.F. (2002) Student group work as real ‘live research’: a case study of Loughborough’s MSc in Sport and Leisure Management Link Newsletter of Hospitality Sport Tourism and Leisure Network Oxford Brookes • Collins M. F.and Buller, J. R. (2003) Social exclusion from high performance sport: are all talented young people being given an equal opportunity of reaching the Olympic podium? Jnl of Sport and Social Issues (US) 27,4.1 420-42

More Related