240 likes | 465 Views
KLT tracker & triangulation Class 6. Read Shi and Tomasi’s paper on good features to track http://www.unc.edu/courses/2004fall/comp/290/089/papers/shi-tomasi-good-features-cvpr1994.pdf Optional: Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On http://www.ri.cmu.edu/projects/project_515.html.
E N D
KLT tracker & triangulationClass 6 Read Shi and Tomasi’s paper on good features to track http://www.unc.edu/courses/2004fall/comp/290/089/papers/shi-tomasi-good-features-cvpr1994.pdf Optional: Lucas-Kanade 20 Years Onhttp://www.ri.cmu.edu/projects/project_515.html
Feature matching vs. tracking Image-to-image correspondences are key to passive triangulation-based 3D reconstruction Extract features independently and then match by comparing descriptors Extract features in first images and then try to find same feature back in next view What is a good feature?
Feature point extraction • Approximate SSD for small displacement Δ • Find points for which the following is maximum maximize smallest eigenvalue of M
SIFT features • Scale-space DoG maxima • Verify minimum contrast and “cornerness” • Orientation from dominant gradient • Descriptor based on gradient distributions
Feature tracking • Identify features and track them over video • Small difference between frames • potential large difference overall • Standard approach: KLT (Kanade-Lukas-Tomasi)
Intermezzo: optical flow • Brightness constancy assumption (small motion) • 1D example possibility for iterative refinement
Intermezzo: optical flow • Brightness constancy assumption (small motion) • 2D example the “aperture” problem (1 constraint) ? (2 unknowns) isophote I(t+1)=I isophote I(t)=I
Intermezzo: optical flow • How to deal with aperture problem? (3 constraints if color gradients are different) Assume neighbors have same displacement
Lucas-Kanade Assume neighbors have same displacement least-squares:
Alternative derivation • Compute translation assuming it is small differentiate: • Affine is also possible, but a bit harder (6x6 in stead of 2x2)
Revisiting the small motion assumption • Is this motion small enough? • Probably not—it’s much larger than one pixel (2nd order terms dominate) • How might we solve this problem? * From Khurram Hassan-Shafique CAP5415 Computer Vision 2003
Reduce the resolution! * From Khurram Hassan-Shafique CAP5415 Computer Vision 2003
u=1.25 pixels u=2.5 pixels u=5 pixels u=10 pixels image It-1 image It-1 image I image I Gaussian pyramid of image It-1 Gaussian pyramid of image I Coarse-to-fine optical flow estimation slides from Bradsky and Thrun
warp & upsample run iterative L-K . . . image J image It-1 image I image I Gaussian pyramid of image It-1 Gaussian pyramid of image I Coarse-to-fine optical flow estimation slides from Bradsky and Thrun run iterative L-K
Good feature to track • Tracking • Use same window in feature selection as for tracking itself maximize minimal eigenvalue of M Strategy: • Look for strong well distributed features, typically few hundreds • initialize and then track, renew feature when too many are lost
Example Simple displacement is sufficient between consecutive frames, but not to compare to reference template
Good features to keep tracking Perform affine alignment between first and last frame Stop tracking features with too large errors
Live demo • OpenCV (try it out!) LKdemo
L2 M m2 C2 Triangulation m1 C1 L1 Triangulation • calibration • correspondences
Triangulation • Backprojection • Triangulation Iterative least-squares • Maximum Likelihood Triangulation
Backprojection • Represent point as intersection of row and column • Condition for solution? Useful presentation for deriving and understanding multiple view geometry (notice 3D planes are linear in 2D point coordinates)