90 likes | 216 Views
Spectral Efficiency Ad-hoc. March 18, 2004. Status and Continuation. The ad-hoc group will meet again Thursday, March 19, 2004 at 7:00 am
E N D
Spectral Efficiency Ad-hoc March 18, 2004
Status and Continuation • The ad-hoc group will meet again Thursday, March 19, 2004 at 7:00 am • In preparation for tomorrow’s ad-hoc meeting participants are requested to focus on Option 1a and Option 3a to determine their willingness to buy in on these options. • For Option 3a, slide 9 provides a “working table” for participants to propose values that they find acceptable. • Participants should “socialize” their thoughts in an attempt to build consensus ahead of the meeting. • The ad-hoc chair would like to propose an additional possible avenue of compromise for people to consider:Consider including, in Option 1a, a statement to the effect that “The evaluation scenario for spectral efficiency shall include at least x% (e.g. 10%) of user terminals that are moving at speed of 120km/h and above.
Option 1a (No technical change but table has been simplified and clarified) The system spectral efficiency of the 802.20 air interface shall be quoted for the case of a three sector baseline configuration[1]. It shall be computed in a loaded multi-cellular network setting, which shall be simulated based on the methodology established by the 802.20 evaluation criteria group. It shall consider among other factors a minimum expected data rate/user and/or other fairness criteria, and percentage of throughput due to duplicated information flow. The values shall be quoted on a b/s/Hz/sector basis. The system spectral efficiency of the 802.20 air interface shall be greater than: The spectral efficiency at different mobility speeds should degrade gracefully. [1]Since the base configuration is only required for the purpose of comparing system spectral efficiency, proposals may submit deployment models over and beyond the base configuration.
Option 3 In this document, the term “System Spectral Efficiency” is defined in the context of a full block assignment deployment and is, thus, calculated as the average aggregate throughput per sector (bps/sector), divided by the spectrum block assignment size (Hz)( taking out all PHY/MAC overhead). For proposal evaluation purposes, the System Spectral Efficiency of the 802.20 air interface shall be quoted for the case of a three sector baseline configuration[1] and an agreed-upon block assignment size. It shall be computed in a loaded multi-cellular network setting, which shall be simulated based on the methodology established by the 802.20 evaluation criteria group. It shall consider, among other factors, a minimum expected data rate/user and/or other fairness criteria, QoS and percentage of throughput due to duplicated information flow. [1]Since the base configuration is only required for the purpose of comparing system spectral efficiency, proposals may submit deployment models over and beyond the base configuration.
Option 3 The system spectral efficiency of the 802.20 air interface shall be greater than the values indicated in table 4-1. The spectral efficiency at higher speeds than those shown should degrade gracefully.
Option 3m (Format change of table in Option 3 to align with table in Option 1a) The system spectral efficiency of the 802.20 air interface shall be greater than the values indicated in table 4-1. The spectral efficiency at higher speeds than those shown should degrade gracefully.
Option 3a (Values TBD) • The system spectral efficiency of the 802.20 air interface shall be greater than the values indicated in table 4-1. The spectral efficiency at higher speeds than those shown should degrade gracefully.