1 / 23

WALTER J. FERRIER University of Kentucky

Competitive Dynamics: Evaluation, Evolution, and Future Direction. WALTER J. FERRIER University of Kentucky. What is Competitive Dynamics ? Where is it headed?. …a paradigm ? …a theory ? …a pre-theory ? …a view ? …a reasoning ? …a lens ? …a method ? Research design element

anakin
Download Presentation

WALTER J. FERRIER University of Kentucky

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Competitive Dynamics: Evaluation, Evolution, and Future Direction WALTER J. FERRIER University of Kentucky

  2. What is Competitive Dynamics?Where is it headed? • …a paradigm? • …a theory? • …a pre-theory? • …a view? • …a reasoning? • …a lens? • …a method? • Research design element • Observational mechanism • Measurement technique

  3. Info processing Social networks Managerial cognition Multi-market competition Prospect/Threat rigidity First-mover Institutional theory Complexity Communication Knowledge Signaling Resource-based view Real option theory Game theory Strategic groups Structure-conduct-perform. Dynamic limit pricing Austrian economics Corporate entrepreneurship Dominant firm/Oligopoly Force field (from psychology) Population ecology Integrated/Contributing Theories

  4. Integrated/Contributing Theories • What do they explain? • Competitive behavior? • …its antecedents, contexts? • …processes? • Does competitive dynamics enable these other theories explain, observe, conceptualize, measure: • “behavior” • “competition” • “events” • “dynamic interactive processes” • “change” • other things?

  5. A Pre-Theory of Competitive Inter-Action:Some Boundary Conditions • Actor relativity/interdependence • The firm relative to: • Itself (over time) • Dyadic partners • Groups • Industry members • Other non-rivals • On factors/dimensions such as: • Competitive actions • Resources/capabilities • Firm characteristics • Outcomes

  6. Pre-Theory of Competitive Inter-Action • Dynamic • Explicitly accounts for: • Time • Change • Evolution • Contingencies • Processes

  7. Pre-Theory of Competitive Inter-Action • Has impact/consequences on: • Performance • Relative • Absolute • Behavior of other firms • Supply chain members • Customers • Suppliers • Regulators • Investors • Society

  8. Pre-Theory of Competitive Inter-Action • Other • Uncertainty, unknowability • Imperfect information • Thought, intent, purpose • Not costless

  9. Theoretical Scaffolding/Fulcrum • Awareness • Alertness • Vision • Scanning • Filtering • Motivation • Intention • Valence • Emotion • Ability • Organizational enablers/constraints • Contextual enablers/constraints • Theoretical Integration Required: • “Other theories” support • and explain logic when integrated • with this AMA theoretical • scaffolding – e.g.: • TMT demographics • Institutional theory • Social network theory • RBV

  10. Pre-Theory of Competitive Inter-Action Organizational Drivers Firm 1 Strategy Awareness Industry Structure Drivers Perf Competitive Inter-Action Ability Motivation Cognitive Drivers Firm 2 Strategy Institutional Drivers Socio- Relational Drivers Other?

  11. Q:What is an action? A: “An externally-directed, observable competitive move ….”Resource-action “cloud chamber”(Barney, 1994) Organizational Routines/Culture The Competitive Marketplace Knowledge/ Technology Distribution Leadership Price Product Reputation/ Image/ Brand Marketing

  12. Levels of Analysis Triad Firm Dyad Wal-Mart Sears Wal-Mart Wal-Mart Sears Macy’s Network Group Industry (or Population) Sears Sak’s Sak’s Wal-Mart Wal-Mart Nordstrom Nordstrom Penny’s K-Mart K-Mart Macy’s Wal-Mart Penny’s Sear’s Sear’s Target Penny’s Macy’s Macy’s Target

  13. Levels of Aggregation Individual Action (or response) Action-Response Dyad Competitive Repertoire 6 × Price Prod Price Mkt 1 × Prod 4 × Mkt 2 × Signaling 1 × Legal Competitive Attack attack Boeing Mkt Signal Prod Price Legal counter attack Airbus Mkt Mkt Prod Price Price time

  14. Potential/Challenging Avenues for Future Research • Network embeddedness • Cognition • Decision-making • Resource/capabilities

  15. Network Evolution, Competitive Actions and Performance t1 t2 t3 A A A B B B Focal Firm Focal Firm Focal Firm C C E D Performance time Mkt Price Mkt Prod Mkt Mkt Prod Price Price

  16. Cognitive/Emotional/Personality-basedDrivers of Competitive Inter-Action

  17. Strategic Decision-making Drivers of Competitive Inter-Action

  18. Capabilities and Actions:Competitive “Spectroscopy” Competitive Forces Organizational Routines/Culture Knowledge/ Technology Intended Target Leadership Reputation/ Image/ Brand Actual Performance Price Mkt Product

  19. What is the next “big thing”? • Phenomena • Constructs • Measures • Levels of analysis or aggregation • Data • Unobservables • Analytical techniques • Theory

  20. Physics Physical Optical Quantum mechanics Biology Molecular/DNA Virology Medicine Neurology Psychiatry Kinesiology Music Perception/appreciation Composition theory Experimental Aesthetics Perception Interpretation Subjective judgment Non-Organizational/Economic Theories

  21. What is Competitive Dynamics? • Coaching a basketball game • Training a hunting dog • Conversation/argument between husband & wife K Phenomenon A Z time • Rivalry: Airbus vs. Boeing • Negotiating a raise • Writing an operatic duet

  22. Competitive Dynamics:Instrumentality and Application • An (any?) open-system process that: • Is interactive • Contains multiple actors • Behavior and outcomes relative among actors • Contains distinct, observable elements, events, or happenings • Contains some perceptual and actual uncertainty or unknowability • Requires some thought, intent, purposefulness on behalf of actors • Is not costless

  23. Your comments and conclusions?Unresolved issues?

More Related