1 / 31

Exploring intertextual semantics

Exploring intertextual semantics. A reflection on attributes and optionality Yves MARCOUX & Élias RIZKALLAH GRDS – EBSI Université de Montréal. Structure of the talk. NL-based modeling and intertextual semantics (IS) (quick review) “IS hypotheses” (ISH-1 and ISH-2)

andeana-munoz
Download Presentation

Exploring intertextual semantics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Exploring intertextual semantics A reflection on attributesand optionality Yves MARCOUX & Élias RIZKALLAH GRDS – EBSI Université de Montréal Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  2. Structure of the talk • NL-based modeling and intertextual semantics (IS) (quick review) • “IS hypotheses” (ISH-1 and ISH-2) • Attributes in the light of IS • Optional containers in the light of IS • Conclusion • Question period Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  3. Intertextual semantics (1/2) • Usual semantics: • Intertextual semantics: Natural orartif. lang. Formal domainex.: 1st order logic S Artificiallanguage S Natural language Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  4. Intertextual semantics (2/2) • A framework in which we can give a precise meaning in NL to the artificial constructs that are structured documents • Is the underlined part an oxymoron? • Not from some standpoints: • Wittgenstein (I think!) • Precision up to a level deemed adequate by the document architect (modeler) • For some given target community Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  5. “NL-based” modeling (1/2) • Modeler works out structural declarationsandcorresponding IS simultaneously • EML2006 explored minimalist approach: two peritexts for each element type: • One “text-before” segment • One “text-after” segment • Both are fixed (constant) • Hyperlinks are allowed in peritexts Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  6. “NL-based” modeling (2/2) • Modeler starts with desired IS (prose) • Identifies structural regularities and corresponding peritexts in the prose • Works out structural declarations • Chooses element names as “abbreviations” of peritexts Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  7. A small example • Raw XML: <billing> <amount-burial>1205.47</amount-burial> <payable-burial>D</payable-burial> <amount-cremation>788.00</amount-cremation> <payable-cremation>F</payable-cremation></billing> Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  8. IS specification Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  9. IS view Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  10. What use can this have? • Mostly an “upstream” semantics: • Give easily understandable meaning to a document being created • Facilitates modeler-author communication • But possible “downstream” uses: • “reference interpretation” (legal?) when multiple renderings are possible • text-only version for text-only tools (ex.: full-text indexing) Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  11. More fundamentally • An IS specification captures the essence of what structural constructs are made for • XML elements / attributes • RDB tables (“The <field-name> is ” ... “.”) • Helps in picking up “good” names • Clearly reveals the ease / difficulty of making sense of our documents Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  12. Has links with... • Literate programming • Computer documentation Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  13. Possible avenuesas of EML2006 • Implementation • “IS view / expansion” in an XML editor • Apply to existing models • Popular ones: RSS, Atom, DocBook, TEI Lite • Explore how to treat attributes • Peritexts associated to element types only • Make explicit the hypotheses under which all this is interesting... Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  14. Structure of the talk • NL-based modeling and intertextual semantics (IS) (quick review) • “IS hypotheses” (ISH-1 and ISH-2) • Attributes in the light of IS • Optional containers in the light of IS • Conclusion • Question period Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  15. ISH-1 (1/2) • The IS of a document corresponds to its meaning (“intended interpretation”) • Assumed to be understandable (interpretable) by the (human) members of the target community either directly, or • by navigating through the network of resources anchored (via hyperlinks) in the IS of the document Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  16. ISH-1 (2/2) • The network needs only extend until it reaches resources directly understandable by the members of the target community • This network of resources suggests an actual interpretation (sense-making) path, but does not impose it • Any specific reading of a document yields more information than the IS, but IS is a guaranteed minimum for all readings Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  17. ISH-1 -- Example Document:<amount currency="MNT">100</amount> IS:Amount (in the currency whose ISO 4217 code is "MNT"): 100 (the table of ISO 4217 codes can be consulted at [http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/popstds/currencycodeslist. html]) Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  18. ISH-1 -- Notes • Intricate structure of the IS prose,many hyperlink traversals needed =>documents are hard to understand • Semantic “precision”: • Evolution, vagueness, are not a problem • Mathematical precision neither Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  19. ISH-2 • A raw XML document should look like an abbreviation of its IS • Thus, element names (generic IDs) should look like abbreviations of their respective peritexts • Related to information perennity Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  20. Structure of the talk • NL-based modeling and intertextual semantics (IS) (quick review) • “IS hypotheses” (ISH-1 and ISH-2) • Attributes in the light of IS • Optional containers in the light of IS • Conclusion • Question period Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  21. What are attributes, really? Subelements?<a href="dog.jpg">Click</a>is simply an abbreviation for:<a><@href>dog.jpg</@href>Click</a> Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  22. Not quite... • Intrinsic lack of ordering • (Name conflicts) • Semantic interplay between element and attribute (tweaking) • Can we account for this in IS? Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  23. Place-holders in peritexts Text-before for element amount:"Amount (in the currency whose ISO 4217 code is “@currency”): " IS of example becomes:Amount (in the currency whose ISO 4217 code is “MNT”): 100. Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  24. Structure of the talk • NL-based modeling and intertextual semantics (IS) (quick review) • “IS hypotheses” (ISH-1 and ISH-2) • Attributes in the light of IS • Optional containers in the light of IS • Conclusion • Question period Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  25. What if the attribute is omitted? • Treat as empty value? • IS of example becomes:Amount (in the currency whose ISO 4217 code is “”): 100. • Ill-formed => bad! Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  26. Marked sections in peritexts Text-before for element amount:"Amount@currency[ (in the currency whose ISO 4217 code is “@”)]: " IS of example (with attribute omitted) :Amount: 100. Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  27. It’s OK to omit, but... • It should be clear (somewhere in the IS) that there could have been something at the point of omission • What it is that could have been there • Why? Because all that contributes to making sense of the document Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  28. Structure of the talk • NL-based modeling and intertextual semantics (IS) (quick review) • “IS hypotheses” (ISH-1 and ISH-2) • Attributes in the light of IS • Optional containers in the light of IS • Conclusion • Question period Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  29. All this is meant to... • Help modelers (and developers) not forget that, want it or not, users do assign meaning to documents • If at least one sense making path is not devised by the modeler, users will roll their own, with possibly unpredictable results • Allow developers to specify and useably deliver to users such sense making paths Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  30. Future work includes • Apply to existing models • More powerful peritext computation? • Need more than peritexts + hyperlinks? • Need more than NL? Images? Sounds? • Multilingualism • Apply to other models / interface design • Experiment in authoring situations Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

  31. Thank you! Questions? Yves Marcoux - Extreme Markup Languages 2007

More Related