1 / 20

Program Update April 11, 2013 Andrew J. Buckler, MS Principal Investigator, QI-Bench

Program Update April 11, 2013 Andrew J. Buckler, MS Principal Investigator, QI-Bench. With Funding Support provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology. Agenda. Summary and close-out of 1H FY13 reporting period: Covering what’s been accomplished from multiple points of view

andie
Download Presentation

Program Update April 11, 2013 Andrew J. Buckler, MS Principal Investigator, QI-Bench

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Program Update April 11, 2013 Andrew J. Buckler, MS Principal Investigator, QI-Bench With Funding Support provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology

  2. Agenda • Summary and close-out of 1H FY13 reporting period: • Coveringwhat’sbeenaccomplishedfrom multiple pointsofview • Progress since F2F: • QIBA Challenge support • Architectural components • Publications 2

  3. FY 2012(n=110) Autumn 2012(n=42) • Established initial structure • Initial Specify, Formulate, and Iterate • Substantial work in Execute and Analyze • First work on test-beds • V&V issues in Execute • Substantial work in Analyze library • Deployment support • Advanced test-beds Winter 2013(n=13) In Queue(n=23) • Architectural design for next generation • Expansion to contour-based analysis • First comprehensive analysis library runs on vCT test-bed • PACS interface to RDSM • Early work on triple store • QI-Bench REST • First workstation support • Realization of QI-Bench cohesive architecture • Migrate worked example test-bed into triples 3 3 3

  4. 5 5 5

  5. Label map files from second 1B study (steps only needed to accommodate 1B) Segmentation Objects: 1.2…UID.dcm Extract tags such as SUBJID, readerID, Acqrep Convert from dcm to nii format Tertiary Analysis Rename to Seg_SUBJID_0_ACQREP_rdrID.dcm Register all seg_SUBJID_0_ACQREP_rdrID.nii with respect to one of them across different acqrep Extract tags such as pixel spacing, matrix Secondary Analysis Calculate volumes Register all seg_SUBJID_0_ACQREP_rdrID.nii with respect to one of them within same acqrep Primary Analysis For each SUBJID and for each ACREP STAPLE  Weights.nii Binarize  Weights-bin.nii Pair-wise comparison between seg_SUBJID_0_ACREP_rdrID.nii-r.nii and Weights-bin.nii Prepare input files for statistical modules Bland Altman, CCC Linear Mixed Effect Probability Density Function of Error Create input files for analysis of metrics: Intersection, Union, Jaccard, DICE 7 7 7 7

  6. Files rdg_SUBJID_participantID.csv and seg_SUBJID_TPINDEX_participantID from participants • Supported segmentation object formats: • Analyze • mhd • mha • nrrd • nii • QIBA Challenge Support Primary Analysis Prepare input files for statistical modules Tertiary Analysis Register all seg_SUBJID_0_ACQREP_rdrID.nii with respect to one of them across different acqrep Bland Altman, CCC Linear Mixed Effect Probability Density Function of Error Secondary Analysis Register all seg_SUBJID_0_ACQREP_rdrID.nii with respect to one of them within same acqrep (steps only needed for 3A) Disregard distractors For each SUBJID and for each ACREP STAPLE  Weights.nii Binarize  Weights-bin.nii Pair-wise comparison between seg_SUBJID_0_ACREP_rdrID.nii-r.nii and Weights-bin.nii Re-assign TPINDEX to ACQREP Roll-up to form s_files, including cov and dcm metadata Create input files for analysis of metrics: Intersection, Union, Jaccard, DICE 8 8 8 8

  7. wernsing DEVELOPMENTPROGRESSREPORT 9 9

  8. 10

  9. 11

  10. 12

  11. 13

  12. 14

  13. 15

  14. Development plan Continue with core development. 1) Controller to support… 2) QI-Bench API 3) Connections to Computing Services 4) Connections to Business Logic and Data Services Parallel work Creating the initial Slicer plug-in Refining and augmenting the QI-Bench API Workflows and custom actors in Kepler Connections to the API Web applications 16

  15. Recent Publications 17

  16. 18

  17. Value proposition of QI-Bench • Efficiently collect and exploit evidence establishing standards for optimized quantitative imaging: • Users want confidence in the read-outs • Pharma wants to use them as endpoints • Device/SW companies want to market products that produce them without huge costs • Public wants to trust the decisions that they contribute to • By providing a verification framework to develop precompetitive specifications and support test harnesses to curate and utilize reference data • Doing so as an accessible and open resource facilitates collaboration among diverse stakeholders 19

  18. Summary:QI-Bench Contributions • We make it practical to increase the magnitude of data for increased statistical significance. • We provide practical means to grapple with massive data sets. • We address the problem of efficient use of resources to assess limits of generalizability. • We make formal specification accessible to diverse groups of experts that are not skilled or interested in knowledge engineering. • We map both medical as well as technical domain expertise into representations well suited to emerging capabilities of the semantic web. • We enable a mechanism to assess compliance with standards or requirements within specific contexts for use. • We take a “toolbox” approach to statistical analysis. • We provide the capability in a manner which is accessible to varying levels of collaborative models, from individual companies or institutions to larger consortia or public-private partnerships to fully open public access. 20

More Related