180 likes | 313 Views
Antiplatelet Therapy Use and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events in the Double-Blind Raloxifene Use for the Heart (RUTH) Trial. C. Duvernoy 1 , A. Yeo 2 , M. Wong 2 , D. Cox 2 H. Kim 1 1 University of Michigan, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
E N D
Antiplatelet Therapy Use and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events in the Double-Blind Raloxifene Use for the Heart (RUTH) Trial C. Duvernoy1, A. Yeo2, M. Wong2, D. Cox2 H. Kim1 1 University of Michigan, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 2Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, IN
Background • Raloxifene 60 mg/d is approved for osteoporosis prevention and treatment in postmenopausal women, and for the reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and those at high risk for invasive breast cancer.1 • In randomized clinical trials, postmenopausal women who received raloxifene 60 mg/d had a significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to placebo. 2-4 • Evista Prescribing Information, Sept. 2007 • Grady D, et al., Ob Gyn 2004; 104: 837-44. • Martino S et al., Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21: 1441-52. • Barrett-Connor E, et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:125-37. Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Background • Platelet activation is thought to be involved more in the pathophysiology of arterial thromboses than venous thromboses.1 • Although some data suggest that aspirin may reduce VTE risk associated with estrogen use,2 other studies suggest it has no effect.3,4 • 1. Tan KT and Lip GY. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2534-2535 • 2. Grady D et al. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:689-696 • 3. Cushman M et al., JAMA 2004;292:1573-1580 • 4. Curb JD et al., Arch Intern Med 2006;166:772-780 Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Objective • To examine the effects of concomitant antiplatelet (AP) therapy on VTE risk in postmenopausal women who participated in the Raloxifene Use for The Heart (RUTH) trial. Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Source: RUTH: Trial Design • International, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial • 177 investigative sites in 26 countries • 10,101 postmenopausal women with established coronary heart disease (CHD) or at increased risk for a major coronary event were enrolled • Randomization from June 1998 to August 2000 • Median 5.6 years follow-up Review: Reviewer Memo: Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007 Slide Modified: Memo:
RUTH: Baseline Characteristics (N=10,101) Characteristic Raloxifene (N=5044) Placebo (N=5057) Age (years, mean + SE) 67.5 + 6.6 67.5 + 6.7 BMI (kg/m2, (mean + SE) 28.8 + 5.2 28.7 + 5.1 Diabetes Mellitus (%) 45.7 45.8 Hypertension (%) 77.9 77.8 Hyperlipidemia (%) 73.3 73.6 History of CHD (%) 50.3 49.4 Prior Myocardial Infarction (%) 29.4 29.0 Lower Extremity Arterial Disease (%) 10.8 10.7 No statistically significant differences between treatment groups on these characteristics Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Antiplatelet (AP) Use in RUTH Baseline During Study Placebo n (%) Raloxifene n (%) Placebo n (%) Raloxifene n (%) AP Use 2967 (58.7) 2960 (58.7) 3709 (73.3) 3759 (74.5) Aspirin Use 2865 (56.7) 2846 (56.4) 3545 (70.1) 3606 (71.5) Non-aspirin Use 142 (2.8) 156 (3.1) 733 (14.5) 704 (14.0) Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Baseline Characteristics by Antiplatelet Use During RUTH Characteristic AP User (N=7468) No AP User* (N=2625) Age (years, mean + SE) 67.7 + 6.6 66.9 + 6.7 BMI (kg/m2, (mean + SE) 28.6 + 5.1 29.2 + 5.4 Diabetes Mellitus (%) 40.9 59.5 Hypertension (%) 76.0 83.1 Hyperlipidemia (%) 75.4 67.7 History of CHD (%) 60.8 18.9 Prior Myocardial Infarction (%) 35.2 12.3 Lower Extremity Arterial Disease (%) 11.5 8.5 *All comparisons between AP users and AP non-users were significant (P<0.01). Within each subgroup of AP users or non-users, characteristics were not significantly different between treatment groups Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
RUTH: Venous Thromboembolic Events (VTE) for All Randomized Women (N=10,101) Source: Review: Reviewer Memo: Barrett-Connor E, et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:125-137 Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007 Slide Modified: Memo:
Incidence of VTE by Antiplatelet Use During RUTH 3.0 HR 1.54 (95% CI 0.82, 2.88) HR 1.40 (95% CI 0.99, 1.97) 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 (n=78) (n=78) (n=25) 1.8 (n=25) Incidence % Placebo 1.6 1.4 (n=55) Raloxifene (n=55) 1.2 (n=16) (n=16) 1.0 Interaction P=0.82 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 (n=3709) (n=3759) (n=1346) (n=1279) No Antiplatelet Use Antiplatelet Use Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Cumulative Incidence of VTE by Treatment Group and Antiplatelet Use 30 Placebo } HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.65, 2.02) Placebo + AP 25 Raloxifene } HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.66, 1.64) Raloxifene + AP 20 Cumulative incidence VTE per 1000 woman years 15 10 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Incidence of VTE by Aspirin Use During RUTH 3.0 HR 1.52 (95% CI 0.83, 2.80) HR 1.40 (95% CI 0.99, 1.99) 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 (n=76) (n=76) 1.8 (n=27) (n=27) Incidence % Placebo 1.6 (n=54) 1.4 Raloxifene (n=54) 1.2 (n=17) (n=17) 1.0 Interaction P=0.85 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 (n=3545) (n=3606) (n=1510) (n=1432) Aspirin Use No Aspirin Use Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Incidence of VTE by Non-Aspirin AP Use During RUTH HR 1.30 (95% CI 0.65, 2.62) 3.0 HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.04, 2.03) 2.8 2.6 (n=18) 2.4 (n=18) 2.2 2.0 (n=85) (n=85) 1.8 (n=14) (n=14) Placebo 1.6 Incidence % 1.4 Raloxifene (n=57) 1.2 (n=57) 1.0 Interaction P=0.79 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 (n=733) (n=704) (n=4322) (n=4334) No Non-Aspirin AP Use Non-Aspirin AP Use Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Incidence of VTE by Baseline Antiplatelet Use HR 1.44 (95% CI 0.98, 2.10) 3.0 HR 1.37 (95% CI 0.83, 2.27) 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 (n=65) (n=65) 2.0 1.8 (n=36) (n=36) Placebo 1.6 Incidence % (n=45) 1.4 Raloxifene (n=45) 1.2 (n=26) (n=26) 1.0 Interaction P=0.88 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 (n=2967) (n=2960) (n=2064) (n=2053) No Antiplatelet Use Antiplatelet Use Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Incidence of VTE by Antiplatelet Use During RUTH Excluding Women with Prior CHD (Primary Prevention Cohort) 3.0 HR 1.57 (95% CI 0.79, 3.11) HR 2.16 (95% CI 1.17, 3.96) 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 (n=34) (n=34) 2.0 (n=20) 1.8 (n=20) Placebo 1.6 Incidence % 1.4 Raloxifene 1.2 (n=14) (n=14) 1.0 (n=15) Interaction P=0.50 (n=15) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 (n=1449) (n=1482) (n=1110) (n=1019) No Antiplatelet Use Antiplatelet Use Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 (n=44) (n=5) 1.8 Placebo 1.6 1.4 Raloxifene 1.2 1.0 0.8 (n=2) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Incidence of VTE by Antiplatelet Use During RUTH: Women with Established CHD (Secondary Prevention Cohort) HR 2.09 (95% CI 0.41, 10.78) HR 1.11 (95% CI 0.72, 1.70) (n=44) (n=5) (n=40) (n=40) Incidence % Interaction P=0.48 (n=2) (n=2260) (n=2277) (n=236) (n=260) No Antiplatelet Use Antiplatelet Use Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Study Limitations • Post-hoc exploratory analysis • Majority of subjects (~74%) took an antiplatelet (AP) agent during the study • Duration of AP use was not assessed • AP use not randomized; however: • AP use did not differ between treatment groups • Potential confounders were balanced between treatment groups within AP user and AP non-user subgroups Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007
Conclusions In the study cohort overall: • the increased risk of VTE with raloxifene compared with placebo was not influenced by use of antiplatelet (AP) agents (aspirin or non-aspirin) • the use of AP agents during RUTH was not associated with a reduced incidence of VTE in either the placebo or raloxifene group For women with established CHD only: • the increased VTE risk with raloxifene compared with placebo seems to be mitigated with AP use, but whether this apparent effect is attributable to AP use or to other factors is unknown Duvernoy, et al. AHA, 2007