460 likes | 737 Views
November 5, 2014 Matthew Tuck, MD Hospitalist, Veterans Affairs Medical Center Assistant Professor of Medicine, George Washington University. Practicing Evidenced-based medicine - Introduction. 30 Years Ago… 1984. http://www.npr.org/2014/04/18/304140932/born-with-hiv-building-a-future.
E N D
November 5, 2014 Matthew Tuck, MD Hospitalist, Veterans Affairs Medical Center Assistant Professor of Medicine, George Washington University Practicing Evidenced-based medicine - Introduction
30 Years Ago… 1984 http://www.npr.org/2014/04/18/304140932/born-with-hiv-building-a-future
Reflection • Take a minute to think about… • What this story made you feel? • What this story made you think? • What questions you have after listening to this story?
What if you didn’t keep up to date? Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(12):888-895.
Learning Objectives • Recognize the importance of practicing evidence-based medicine • Develop a systematic approach to practicing evidence-based medicine • Calculate absolute risk reduction, relative risk, relative risk reduction, and number needed to treat
Steps In Practicing EBM Ask Acquire Appraise Assess Apply
Steps in Practicing EBM • Ask: Convert the need for information into an answerable question. • Acquire: Track down the best evidence with which to answer that question. • Appraise: Critically appraise the evidence for its validity, impact, and applicability. • Apply: Integrate the evidence with our clinical expertise and our patient’s characteristics and values.
Foreground Question TYPE OF QUESTION Background Question CLINICAL EXPERIENCE The nature of the question asked is critically experience dependent.
Questions • Background • Foreground
Back to Cristina and Chris… • Cristina and Chris are sexually active. Chris is HIV negative. They are wondering what treatments are available to help Chris from contracting HIV while maintaining a sexual relationship. What do you tell them?
Back to Cristina and Chris… • Cristina and Chris are sexually active. Chris is HIV negative. They are wondering what treatments are available to help Chris from contracting HIV while maintaining a sexual relationship. • P = HIV serodiscordant couples • I = Antiretroviral prophylaxis • C = Standard medical care, placebo • O = HIV seroconversion
Steps in Practicing EBM • Ask: Convert the need for information into an answerable question. • Acquire: Track down the best evidence with which to answer that question. • Appraise: Critically appraise the evidence for its validity, impact, and applicability. • Apply: Integrate the evidence with our clinical expertise and our patient’s characteristics and values.
Two Cardinal Rules of EBM • Not all evidence is created equal • A heirarchy of evidence guides clinical decision making • Evidence alone is never enough • Competent physicians balance risks and benefits of management strategies in the context of patient values and preferences
The Evidence Pyramid Experimental Observational
T – Type of Question/Type of Study • P = HIV serodiscordant couples • I = Antiretroviral prophylaxis • C = Standard medical care, placebo • O = HIV seroconversion
Steps in Practicing EBM • Ask: Convert the need for information into an answerable question. • Acquire: Track down the best evidence with which to answer that question. • Appraise: Critically appraise the evidence for its validity, impact, and applicability. • Apply: Integrate the evidence with our clinical expertise and our patient’s characteristics and values.
How are Results Presented? • Absolute Risk = Event Rate • The number of people experiencing an event as a proportion of the total number of people in a population • Key Words • Divide if you see • Relative • Ratio • Subtractif you see • Absolute • Difference • Reduction
Example • 200 pre-schoolers • 100 pre-schoolers were randomized to drug X vs. 1o0 pre-schoolers to placebo for prevention of nose picking • 10 kids receiving drug X still picked their noses • 15 kids receiving placebo still picked their noses
What is the Risk of Nose Picking? • Drug X event rate = 10% • Placebo event rate = 15% • There are only two things we can do to these numbers • Subtract, or • Divide
Subtract Baseline Risk Experimental Risk • 15% - 10% = 5% • What does this number represent? • Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) or Risk Difference • Arithmetic difference between 2 event rates • We refer to the risk of the adverse outcome in the control group as the baseline risk
Divide • 10% = 0.67 15% • What does this number represent? • Relative risk (RR) • Synonym = Risk Ratio • The proportion of the baseline risk that is still present when patients receive the experimental treatment Baseline Risk
Relative Risk Reduction • “What proportion of the baseline risk has been reduced by the experimental treatment?” • RRR = 1 – RR = 1 – 0.67 = 0.33 = 33% OR • RRR = ARR/baseline risk = 5%/15% = 0.33 = 33%
ARR vs. RRR… Why the Fuss? 50 25 10 5 2 1 Control Exper. Control Exper. Control Exper. ARR: RRR: 25% 5% 1% 50% 50% 50%
Number Needed to Treat (NNT) • NNT = 1/ARR Why? • If ARR = 5%... • Treating 100 people reduces outcome in 5; How many do I need to treat to help 1? • Answer = 20 100 5 ? 1
Calculate ARR ARR = 52/1578 – 13/1576 = 0.025
Calculate RR, RRR RRR = 1 – 0.25 = 0.75
Calculate NNT NNT = 1/ARR = 1/0.025 = 40
Steps in Practicing EBM • Ask: Convert the need for information into an answerable question. • Acquire: Track down the best evidence with which to answer that question. • Appraise: Critically appraise the evidence for its validity, impact, and applicability. • Apply: Integrate the evidence with our clinical expertise and our patient’s characteristics and values.
Questions? Matthew Tuck, MD Matthew.Tuck@va.gov 202-745-8000 x53994