1 / 17

Trademark and Unfair Comp.

Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 2, 2008 Dilution. Trademark Causes of Action. Infringement Registered Trademarks False Designation of Origin (Unregistered) Dilution False Advertising Cybersquatting. Issues with Dilution. Standard for protection

andres
Download Presentation

Trademark and Unfair Comp.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 2, 2008 Dilution

  2. Trademark Causes of Action • Infringement • Registered Trademarks • False Designation of Origin (Unregistered) • Dilution • False Advertising • Cybersquatting

  3. Issues with Dilution • Standard for protection • Actual dilution or likelihood of dilution? • Tarnishment? • Marks entitled to protection • Niche fame or nationwide fame? • Inherent or acquired distinctiveness?

  4. Federal Dilution • Lanham Act §43(c) • (1) [T]he owner of a famous mark that is distinctive, inherently or through acquired distinctiveness, shall be entitled to an injunction against another person who … commences use of a mark … in commerce that is likely to cause dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment of the famous mark

  5. Federal Dilution • Lanham Act §43(c) • (B) `dilution by blurring' is association arising from the similarity between a mark or trade name and a famous mark that impairs the distinctiveness of the famous mark. In determining whether a mark or trade name is likely to cause dilution by blurring, the court may consider all relevant factors, including the following: • (i) The degree of similarity between the mark or trade name and the famous mark. • (ii) The degree of inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the famous mark. • (iii) The extent to which the owner of the famous mark is engaging in substantially exclusive use of the mark. • (iv) The degree of recognition of the famous mark. • (v) Whether the user of the mark or trade name intended to create an association with the famous mark. • (vi) Any actual association between the mark or trade name and the famous mark.

  6. Federal Dilution • Lanham Act §43(c) • (C) `dilution by tarnishment' is association arising from the similarity between a mark or trade name and a famous mark that harms the reputation of the famous mark.

  7. Federal Dilution • Lanham Act §43(c) • (2)(A) a mark is famous if it is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark's owner. In determining whether a mark possesses the requisite degree of recognition, the court may consider all relevant factors, including the following: • (i) The duration, extent, and geographic reach of advertising and publicity of the mark, … • (ii) The amount, volume, and geographic extent of sales of goods or services offered under the mark. • (iii) The extent of actual recognition of the mark.

  8. Federal Dilution • Lanham Act §43(c) • (3) The following shall not be actionable s dilution: • (A) Any fair use … of a famous mark … other than as a designation of source for the person’s own goods or services, including use in connection with – • (i) advertising or promotion that permits consumers to compare goods or services; or • (ii) identifying and parodying, criticizing, or commenting upon the famous mark owner or the goods or services of the famous mark owner. • (B) All forms of news reporting and news commentary. • (C) Any noncommercial use of the mark.

  9. Arthur the Aardvark Clue (board game) Candyland (board game) Hotmail (website) Children’s Place (store) The Sporting News (mag) WaWa (grocery) Star Market (grocery) Famous Not famous Famous Famous Not famous Famous Famous Not famous Famous?

  10. Louis Vuitton v. Haute Diggety

  11. Hershey v. Mars

  12. Ringling Brothers v. Utah

  13. Ringling Brothers v. Celozzi The Greatest Used Car Show on Earth

  14. Mead v. Toyota

  15. Deere v. MTD Products

  16. Hormel v. Jim Henson

  17. Administrative Details • Next Assignment • Read VII.D – Cybersquatting

More Related