1 / 11

Central Portland

Central Portland. Prevention. Keep in Mind. Speak up! Respect others’ viewpoints We are all here because we are invested in progress Refrain from “blaming” Funding requirements and limitations. Meeting Goals:. Policy initiatives updates – next steps Scanners are in! Now What

andresn
Download Presentation

Central Portland

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Central Portland Prevention

  2. Keep in Mind.... • Speak up! • Respect others’ viewpoints • We are all here because we are invested in progress • Refrain from “blaming” • Funding requirements and limitations

  3. Meeting Goals: • Policy initiatives updates – next steps • Scanners are in! Now What • Coalition building, determine the other drug(s) that SNAP will address.

  4. Logic Model • 34% of 44 outlets served “VIPs” in ED • Law enforcement/retailer observations Local Condition Service to VIPs in bars that cater to YAs Root Cause Retail Availability High concentration of bars/nightclubs especially in PDX E.D. • MC 3.6 outlets per 100 YAs (state is 2.8) • Highest concentration downtown 63% of YA drank at bar, restaurant or club when drinking (OHA Survey) • Statewide 13 VIP violations; 5 Serious and Persistent in 2012 • Lack of local control Consistent theme in law enforcement interviews Problem State laws regarding alcohol service impede local enforcement of liquor laws Lack of consequences YA Binge Drinking Higher use rates than state average but lower incidents per 100 18-25 year olds: MIP(.85 vs. 4.4), DUII (.74 vs. 1.3), Liquor Law Violations (.95 vs. 2.5) 44.5% of 18-25 report binge drinking in the last month (NSDUH) Enforcement has limited capacity for MIPs and when MIPs are issued there is no consequence/intervention through the court. 3 OLCC officers for district Policy of Juvenile Court • PSU survey: 27% actually used 10+ days, 67% perceived most YAs are using 10+ days Community Norms Support Use Misperception of drinking rates • Frequent theme with youth focus groups and town halls • Perception of acceptability • Perception of community culture • 3,128 drinking in public in PDX • Frequent calls for service (in E.D.) Visible intoxication and high rates of calls for service in PDX E.D.

  5. How Saturation Fits SNAP’s Plan Local Condition Root Cause Problem High concentration of bars/nightclubs especially in PDX E.D. Retail Availability Too Many YAs Binge Drinking 67% of YA drank at bar, restaurant or club when drinking (OHA Survey) • MC 3.6 outlets per 100 YAs (state is 2.8) • Highest concentration downtown 44.5% of 18-25 report binge drinking in the last month (NSDUH)

  6. Limiting Saturation • Rulemaking as a means for education • Leveling the playing field for responsible bar owners www.pamaction.com

  7. Emerging Issue

  8. How MIP work Fits SNAP’s Plan Local Condition Root Cause Problem Enforcement has limited capacity for MIPs and when MIPs are issued no consequence /intervention through the court. Lack of Consequences Too Many YAs Binge Drinking Higher use rates than state average but lower incidents per 100 18-25 year olds: MIP(.85 vs. 4.4), DUII (.74 vs. 1.3), Liquor Law Violations (.95 vs. 2.5) (2011 Oregon State Police, Data) 2013: 410 from OLCC 44.5% of 18-25 report binge drinking in the last month (NSDUH) • 3 OLCC enforcement; limited PPB officer time for all nightlife in pdx, including extra 8,000 who come to E.D. on weekends • Juvenile Court issues letter to parents as policy

  9. MIP Strategies: Next Steps • Enforcement: • Additional officer time • E-ticket writers • Policy: • initial steps: collecting data, making the case, increasing awareness • Outreach/Education: • Increase collaboration among schools/community/courts, etc.

  10. How Scanners Fit SNAP’s Plan Problem Root Cause Local Condition Retail Availability Service to VIPs in bars that cater to young adults Too Many YAs Binge Drinking 67% of YA drank at bar, restaurant or club when drinking (OHA Survey) • 34% of 44 outlets served “VIPs” in ED • Law enforcement/retailer observations 44.5% of 18-25 report binge drinking in the last month (NSDUH)

  11. Scanners Installed!!! • Bars participating • 12 months of service • Big Thanks LFL and PPB!!!! • Next steps for SNAP?

More Related