1 / 25

Accountability data overview

Accountability data overview. July 2013. Topics. Overview of Progress & Performance Index and Accountability & Assistance Level data Measures Reports Resources and tools. What were the major changes for 2012?.

anevay
Download Presentation

Accountability data overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Accountability data overview July 2013

  2. Topics Overview of Progress & Performance Index and Accountability & Assistance Level data • Measures • Reports • Resources and tools Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  3. What were the major changes for 2012? • NCLB goal of 100 percent proficient replaced by new goal of reducing proficiency gaps by half by 2017 • NCLB accountability status labels replaced by state’s accountability & assistance levels (Levels 1-5) • AYP replaced by new performance measure (Progress & Performance Index - PPI) that incorporates student growth, science, & other indicators Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  4. State performance targets under NCLB Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  5. What were the major changes for 2012? (continued) • Data reported for new “high needs” subgroup, an unduplicated count of all students belonging to any of these subgroups: low income, students with disabilities, English language learner/former English language learner • School percentile reported, representing school’s overall performance on PPI indicators relative to other schools of the same school type Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  6. What are some key PPI concepts? • The PPI is a measure of progress toward a group’s gap-narrowing goals • Annual PPI shows progress over two years • Cumulative PPI represents trend over time • Core indicators (up to 7) • ELA, math, & science proficiency gap narrowing (CPI) • ELA & math growth (SGP) • Annual dropout rate • Cohort graduation rate (4-and 5-year) • Extra credit for reducing percentage of students scoring Warning/Failing or increasing percentage of students scoring Advanced (10 percent or more) • PPI runs from 0-100: 75 considered to be On Target Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  7. Annual PPI = total points / # core indicatorsCumulative PPI = (2010*1 + 2011*2 + 2012*3 + 2013*4) / 10 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  8. What are some key Level concepts? • Schools and districts are classified into a level based on a four-year trend • The cumulative PPI for all students and high needs students is used to classify schools into Levels 1 & 2 • School percentiles (1-99) represent performance relative to other schools of the school type, and are used to determine Level 3 schools (lowest-performing 20 percent per state law) • Districts are classified based on the level of lowest-performing school (exception for Board action) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  9. The PPI and the school percentile • PPI is a criterion-referenced measure of progress • Percentiles are relative, and help the state and districts focus supports on low-achieving students in low performing schools • Massachusetts uses school types (ES, ESMS, MS, MSHS, HS) to fairly compare the performance of schools serving the same or similar grades and distribute resources equitably • Every school’s percentile and PPI tells a different story • Schools with lower percentiles but higher PPIs for all student groups are showing improvement over time • Schools with higher percentiles but lower PPIs are high performing, but have more work to do to support student success Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  10. Sample reports

  11. Level 1 school (first layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  12. Level 1 school (second layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  13. Third layer of report Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  14. Level 2 school (first layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  15. Level 3 school (first layer of report) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  16. Resources and tools http://www.doe.mass.edu/apa/accountability Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  17. Gap-halving calculators Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  18. PPI calculator Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  19. District analysis, review, & assistance tools http://www.doe.mass.edu/apa/dart Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  20. District analysis, review, & assistance tools http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/analysis/ Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

  21. Questions? ESEA@doe.mass.edu | 781-338-3550 http://www.doe.mass.edu/apa/general Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

More Related