380 likes | 392 Views
Explore the benefits of supplementation and feeding programs for calves and stocker cattle, covering topics like target weight gain, winter and late-summer supplementation, nutrient needs, and the pros and cons of substitution. Understand the influence of rate of gain on body composition and learn about protein and energy supplementation in forage-fed cattle. Find out when to opt for supplementation or substitution based on cost, availability of resources, and desired gain outcomes.
E N D
Discussion Topics • Supplementing vs substituting • Appropriate rate of gain target (not covered in manual) • Winter supplementation • Late-summer supplementation • Feeding programs
Supplementationof forage-fed cattle: Supplying a nutrient that is deficient in the forage, resulting in increased forage digestibility, increased forage intake, and (or) improved animal health and performance
Supplementation of Forage-Fed Cattle • Nutrients supplemented • Vitamins • Minerals • Protein • Energy* • Amount • Generally fed in small quantities ranging from a few grams to 0.5% of body weight
Positive Associative Effect “Feeding” Supplementation Supplementation VS Substitution
Drawing the Line Between Supplementation and Feeding • Not well defined and extremely variable depending on many factors • Assuming protein supply is adequate, > .5%of BW feed associated with decline in forage intake • Substitution rate ranges from .5 to 2 lbdecline in forage intake for each 1 lb feed beyond .5% BW
Substitution (Feeding) • Advantageous when: • concentrates are inexpensive • land resource is limited (need to increase stocking rate) • forage availability is limited (drought) • harvested forages are expensive relative to concentrates • grazing endophyte infected fescue pastures
Substitution (Feeding) • Costly when: • forage quantity is adequate and concentrates are expensive • desired gain can be achieved with high quality forage • occurs without producer’s knowledge (tradition?)
Supplementation • Usually a good thing • enhances animal performance • improves resource utilization (forage) • lowers cost of gain due greater energy harvested from cheap forage resource • But not always • accelerated forage use
How much should cattle gain during winter or growing period? • Destination • Feed yard after receiving/growing period? • Wheat pasture after receiving/weaning period? • Spring/Summer pasture after dry wintering? • Cost and availability of resources: can you do it cheaper than a commercial yard? • Marketing considerations
60 d 180 d 500 d Influence of Rate of Gain on Body Composition Days to 15% =
How does condition influence pasture gain? .3 to .5 lb/d less ADG, lbs Brazle, 1999: Heifers, 602 head with 86 days grazing
Summary: Rate of weight gain during winter or growing phase • Fast rate of growing period gain and increased fleshiness reduces grazing rate of gain • Moderate rate of growing period gain (1.25 to 1.75) justified: light cattle, cheap feed, short grazing period, high growth potential
Protein supplementation required for moderate to low rate of gain by forage protein content Forage Protein Content (DM) ADG 4% 6% 8% 10% .5 .6 .4 .25 .1 1.0 .75 .6 .45 .25
Series of OSU studies to evaluate the effect of protein supplementation for stockers during late-summer grazing
Protein Supplement for Stockers Grazing Native Pasture Init. Init. Cont. Sup. Sup. Date Days Wt. ADG ADG Dif. Conv. 7/16 96 580 1.44 1.88 .44 1.8 7/20 56 350 1.35 1.72 .37 2.2 7/20 62 616 1.06 1.39 .33 3.2 8/16 56 490 .83 1.32 .49 2.0 7/16 84 645 .83 1.25 .42 2.9 5/25 84 365 1.48 1.75 .27 3.7 Avg 71 498 1.13 1.51 .37 2.7
Oklahoma Gold 1lb/d 38-40% protein supplement Bovatec, Rumensin or CTC Vitamins and Trace Minerals Expected response = .57 lb / d
Oklahoma Super Gold 2.5 lb/d 25% protein supplement Bovatec, Rumensin or CTC Vitamins and Trace Minerals Expected response = .76 lb / d
Consider Super Gold When: • Feed prices (energy) are moderate to low • Light calves (< 400 lb) • Faster rate of gain necessary to meet predetermined market weight
Feed Additives: Ionophores • Rumensin, Bovatec, (Gainpro) • Increase ADG by .15 to .2 lb. per day • Cost: • 150 mg Rumensin = $.01 to .05 / day • 200 mg Bovatec = $.01 to .05 / day • Added gain is worth $.08 to $.12 / day
Summary: Supplementation • Match the supplementation program to the forage type, time of year, and current conditions • Recognize the difference between supplementation and substitution • Supplementing can only be profitable if value of added gain is > cost of added gain • Make certain protein requirement is met, but don’t overfeed protein
Energy Supplementation • Extremely inefficient when protein req. is not met
Energy Supplementation • Extremely inefficient when protein req. is not met
Energy and Protein Crn, Item None SBM Crn SBM Amt fed, lb 0 8.2 8.2 2.5 ADG, lb. .12 1.7 .64 1.06 Efficiency, lb/lb - 5.2 15.8 2.7 Bodine et al., 2000 Steers: initial weight = 631 lb. Corn, SBM blend = 16% CP (AF)
Energy Supplementation • Extremely inefficient when protein req. is not met • Requires more labor, equipment, facilities etc. because feeding rate is considerably higher compared to protein supplementation • Added gain during winter usually means lower gain during spring and summer
How much protein to include in feed for cattle consuming low protein forage? Amount Fed .5 .75 1.0 1.25 ----------------Percent of Body Weight-------------- Feed protein, % as fed 25-30 22-25 18-22 15-18 Grain:SBM 50/50 64/36 70/30 80/20 CSM can be substituted for SBM at 5-6% higher inclusion rate.
Example feed rations are shown for cattle consuming high quality grass hay (both low and moderate protein) in Table 17.6.
Grain and Alfalfa Hay • Highly complementary • Hay:Grain ratio of 60:40 (or about 1% of BW corn or milo and ad lib good quality alfalfa hay) will sustain around 2 lb per day gain • Grain:hay ratio can range from about 30:70 to 70:30
Summary • Numerous supplementation and feeding alternatives are available • Producer’s must determine their goal, given their current conditions • Maximize forage use and conversion? • Increase weight gain at least possible cost? • Maintain specific or minimum level of performance?
Relationship of Winter to Summer Gain McCollum and Gill