320 likes | 765 Views
Examples of systematic reviews. Goran Poropat. Cochrane systematic reviews. To make unmanageable amounts of information – manageable Identify, appraise and synthesize research-based evidence Present in an accessible format. Cochrane systematic reviews. C learly stated set of objectives
E N D
Examples of systematic reviews Goran Poropat
Cochrane systematic reviews To make unmanageable amounts of information – manageable Identify, appraise and synthesize research-based evidence Present in an accessible format
Cochrane systematic reviews Clearly stated set of objectives Explicit, reproducible methodology Systematic search Assessment of validity Systematic presentation
Protocol for a Cochrane review Idea Register title Write protocol To minimize the potential for bias in the review process Changes possible
Bezafibrate for primary biliary cirrhosis • Chronic, progressive, inflammatory and autoimmune-mediated liver disease • Survival in symptomatic patients = 10-15 yr. • Bilirubin – indipendent predictor of survival and prognosis • Bezafibrate – inhibition of acetil-CoA carboxylase activity • PPAR - ATP-binding cassette (ABC) B4 transporter • Increased secretion of phosphatidyl-choline
Bezafibrate for primary biliary cirrhosis Methods Types of studies • RCTs assessing bezafibrate in patients with PBC • Irrespective of blinding, language, publication status • Quasi-randomised and observational studies • Exluded for report of benefit • Included for report of harm
Bezafibrate for primary biliary cirrhosis Types of participants • Pts with PBC • Elevated alkaline phophatases • Positive anti-mitochondrial antibody • Compatible liver biopsy Types of interventions – bezafibrate at any dose or regimen vs. placebo or any other drug
Bezafibrate for primary biliary cirrhosis Types of outcome measures
Bezafibrate for primary biliary cirrhosis Search methods of identification of studies • Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register • The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library • MEDLINE • EMBASE • Science Citation Index Expanded • LILACS • Chinese Bio-medical Literature Database • Reference lists of identified studies • Pharmaceutical companies • Clinicaltrials.gov • WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform
Bezafibrate for primary biliary cirrhosis Data collection and analysis • Two authors independently • Disagreements resolved by discussion Risk of bias assessment • Allocation sequence generation • Allocation concealment • Blinding • Incomplete outcome data • Selective outcome reporting • Other bias
Bezafibrate for primary biliary cirrhosis Statistical analyses • Fixed-effect and random-effect models meta-analyses • Dichotomous outcomes – RR/RD (95% CI) • Continuous outcomes – MD (95% CI) • Dichotomous outcomes – intention-to-treat • Continuous outcomes – case analysis and inclusion of known data • Assesment of heterogeneity (chi-square test) • Trial sequential analysis
Search results 91 PUBLICATIONS IDENTIFIED 26 DUPLICATES 65 PUBLICATIONS ASSESSED 58 PUBLICATIONS EXCLUDED 7 PUBLICATIONS INCLUDED 6 TRIALS INCLUDED 2 TRIALS (N=69) Bezafibrate vs. UDCA 4 TRIALS (N=82) Bezafibrate vs. no intervention
Characteristics of included studies • All trials from Japan • Parallel groups design (5 trials) • Cross-over design (1 trial) • >85% participants were female • Non-advanced PBC (4 trials) • PBC stage not known (2 trials)
Characteristics of included studies • Bezafibrate 400 mg daily orally • Duration of administration of bezafibrate • 6 moths (2 trials) • 12-13 months (4 trials) • UDCA 600 mg daily orally
Risk of bias judgement All six trials are at high risk of bias
ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY LIVER-RELATED MORBIDITY
ADVERSE EVENTS PRURITUS
ALKALINE PHOSPHATASES MD-186, 95% CI -249 to-123; I2 = 34%
Trial sequential analysis (ALP) A minimal relevant difference 100 U/L (based on clinical judgement, more modest than the estimated effect seen in the meta-analysis) Standard deviation 200 U/L Risk of type I error 5% Risk of type II error 20% Required information size 216
Other results No effect on IgM Bilirubin GT ALT Total cholesterol Tryglicerids
ConclusionBezafibrate vs. no intervention • No significant effect on mortality, liver-related morbidity, adverse events, and pruritus • Quality of life and fatigue could not be assessed • Trial sequential analysis implies evidence for a beneficial effect on serum alkaline phosphatases activity
Results:Trials assessing bezafibrate vs. ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)
ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY LIVER-RELATED MORBIDITY
ADVERSE EVENTS ALKALINE PHOSPHATASES
Other results Significant decrease of ALP, GT, ALT, IgM Fixed-effect analysis No effect on GT, ALT, IgM Random-effect analysis
ConclusionBezafibrate vs. UDCA • No significant effect on mortality, liver-related morbidity, adverse events, and pruritus • Quality of life, pruritus, and fatigue could not be assessed • There is no firm evidence of effect on ALP, GT, ALT, and IgM
CONCLUSIONS Treatment ofprimary biliary cirrhosis with bezafibrate can neither be supported nor rejected