1 / 18

Hydrogen risk assessment in São Paulo State – Brazil

4 th International Conference on Hydrogen Safety ICHS 2011 12 - 14 September 2011 San Francisco, CA, USA. Hydrogen risk assessment in São Paulo State – Brazil Newton Pimenta Sandro Tomaz Giuseppe Michelino. 198_NevesN. São Paulo State (SP). Municipalities: 645 Population:

angus
Download Presentation

Hydrogen risk assessment in São Paulo State – Brazil

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 4th International Conference on Hydrogen SafetyICHS 2011 12 - 14 September 2011 San Francisco, CA, USA Hydrogen risk assessment in São Paulo State – Brazil Newton PimentaSandro TomazGiuseppe Michelino 198_NevesN

  2. São Paulo State (SP) • Municipalities: 645 • Population: • 41 million inhabitants • 95% urban • Gross Domestic Product: 34% of the country • 21 million vehicles • 108,000 industries FONTES: IBGE, DETRAN-SP

  3. SP Environmental Protection Agency (CETESB)

  4. CETESB Main Objectives • Evaluation of environmental quality Air - Water - Soil • Inspection of environmental pollution sources • Technology transfer in the environmental field • Prevention - environmental licensing • Main focus is outside the walls.

  5. VILA SOCÓ - CUBATÃO CITY 04/Feb/1984 GASOLINE PIPELINE RUPTURE FOLLOWED BY FIRE Source: Banco de Imagens da CETESB/1984

  6. 500 victims 93 deaths Source: Petrobrás

  7. Licensing - Prevention Environmental Licensing Previous and Installation License Operational License Risk Analysis (RA)

  8. Hazardous substanceand quantity (RD) Off-site Vulnerability QRA? NO YES Off-site scenarios selection ConsequenceAnalysis FrequencyAnalysis CETESB’s Risk Analysis Flowchart Risk estimation (Societal & Individual) Needriskreduction? YES Risk reduction measures NO Risk Management Program

  9. Risk Management Program (RMP) • Process Safety Information • Management of Change • Operating Procedures • Training • Assuring the Quality and Mechanical Integrity of Critical Equipment • Emergency Response and Control • Investigation of Incidents • Audit of Risk Management Systems

  10. Comparison: QRA x RMP Quantitative Risk Analysis: Expensive Subject to greater uncertainties Time-consuming Risk Management Program Not expensive Simple Less time used in analysis Reference Distance supports the decision-making

  11. Reference Distance (RD) • Reference Distance (RD) • Maximum distance reached by 0.1 bar overpressure from vapour cloud explosion (1% death). • Instantaneous release of 20% of the inventory of a vessel/tank • Cloud dispersion to Lower Flammability Limit (LFL) • Vapour Cloud Explosion (VCE) • Software PHAST 6.54 determines the “worst case” consequences for an explosion. • Chart: RD x Mass

  12. Hydrogen RD Chart and VCE Vapour Cloud Explosion Hydrogen RD Chart Distance to 0.1 bar Cloudcenter Leaksource LFL Reference Distance (m) Simulation : weather conditions

  13. RD Application Population inside RD circle? NO Risk Management Program (RMP) YES QRA

  14. Example of RD Application • Four interconnected hydrogen vessels, each one with 250 kg (total 1,000 kg) • Chart indicates a RD of 81 m • Is there population inside the RD circle? From the figure the answer is YES • Conclusion: the facility must submit a full QRA to CETESB

  15. Example of RD Application

  16. Discussion • The assumptions may be conservative in some cases. For example: it does not consider any protective system • Initial screening • Covers storage cases • Not for continuous process

  17. Conclusion • Not the worst case, but conservative • Simple, easy to aplly and cheaper • Money / time saving

  18. Thank you! Obrigado! São Paulo Environmental Protection Agency Brazilian Reference Center for Hydrogen Energy Hydrogen Laboratory at Unicamp Contacts: Sandro Tomaz sandrot@cetesbnet.sp.gov.br Giuseppe Michelino giuseppem@cetesbnet.sp.gov.br Newton Pimenta nevesjr@ifi.unicamp.br

More Related