110 likes | 222 Views
Preparing for the CD-2 Review. Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting October 12-14, 2006. Internal FY06 Project Milestones. Hall D Tagging Spectrometer and Photon Beamline Review (23-Jan-06) Report on barrel calorimeter fiber tests (30-Jun-06)
E N D
Preparing for the CD-2 Review Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting October 12-14, 2006
Internal FY06 Project Milestones • Hall D Tagging Spectrometer and Photon Beamline Review (23-Jan-06) • Report on barrel calorimeter fiber tests (30-Jun-06) • Report on tagger prototyping (30-Jun-06) • Report on Cerenkov readout and optics studies (31-Jul-06) • Report on UPV prototyping (31-Jul-06) • Report on FADC prototyping (31-Aug-06) • Report on auxiliary electronics prototyping (31-Aug-06) • Report on full-scale prototypes of FDCs and CDCs (30-Sep-06) • Recommendation #27 IPR Sec 2.5 (30-Jun-07)
Outcome of the Upgrade Status Review (June 2006) • The main recommendation was to schedule a • “Mini-Review” to assess CD-2 readiness at mid-year • Pre-briefing material due Dec 1 • Main emphasis is on “resource-loaded schedule” • TJSO-led review Dec 19-21 • Lehman/DOE-NP review results late Jan
Resource-loaded schedule schedule • For “Mini-review” match schedule to Cost Book • Cost book is unchanged since 2005 except for minor changes in fy07 • Schedule will be updated next spring with realistic updated costs and plans in preparation for CD-2
Outcome of the Upgrade Status Review (June 2006) • Final report: 19 recommendations • For Detector Systems: • Continue development of full detector simulation and reconstruction studies with the goal of validating that detector designs meet physics performance requirements for Halls B and D. • Conduct external peer reviews of Hall B and D detector designs and of superconducting magnet designs in time to impact the baseline designs of these subsystems. • November Software Workshop to address first bullet
Hall D Milestones for FY07 Decision on readout for barrel calorimeter (Rec #27) Drift chamber design requirements finalized
Safety list for each subsystem • Safety issues that might arise during preparations and construction • List of ways to mitigate those issues • Specific safety reviews that might be needed • Send them to me by the end of this meeting
CD-2 • Establishes the baseline budget for construction • Reviews preliminary design (~35%) • Requests construction funding • Conducted by DOE-NP and OECM
Deadlines • CD-2 is expected next summer. • Pre-briefing material needs to be in place by ~April • Decisions impacting the review must be made by ~Jan at the latest • Decisions at this meeting • Plans for the solenoid • Cerenkov Detector
Manpower • Manpower plan for 6 and 12-GeV is working its way through the system. • Manpower has been identified as existing at the lab or requiring external hires • Time is needed for new hires even after approval • Key Personnel • Hall D engineer (note: falling between the cracks) • Electronics coordinator • Cerenkov detector • My proposal • Try to re-direct existing manpower for fy07 • Start hiring new personnel in coordination with new group leader as soon as practical