1 / 36

An acoustic phonetic analysis of Lewis Gaelic stop consonants

An acoustic phonetic analysis of Lewis Gaelic stop consonants. Claire Nance and Jane Stuart-Smith University of Glasgow c.nance.1@research.gla.ac.uk j.stuart-smith@englang.arts.gla.ac.uk. Overview. Stops in Gaelic Approaches Research questions Methods Results Conclusions.

anisa
Download Presentation

An acoustic phonetic analysis of Lewis Gaelic stop consonants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An acoustic phonetic analysis of Lewis Gaelic stop consonants Claire Nance and Jane Stuart-Smith University of Glasgow c.nance.1@research.gla.ac.uk j.stuart-smith@englang.arts.gla.ac.uk

  2. Overview • Stops in Gaelic • Approaches • Research questions • Methods • Results • Conclusions

  3. Stops in Gaelic • Word initial /ph th kh/ and /p t k/ • Word medial and word final /hp ht hk/ and /p t k/ (Ladefoged et al. 1998) • (Also palatalised vs. velarised distinction)

  4. Initial stops VOT Vowel voicing Closure pòg ‘a kiss’ Vowel voicing Closure bog ‘soft’

  5. VOT vs. Pre-aspiration • ‘the interval between the release of the stop and the onset of glottal vibration, that is, voicing’ (Lisker and Abramson 1964:389) • ‘delay in the offset of normal voicing’ (Laver 1994:150) • Aspiration ≠ pre-aspiration (Silverman 2003)

  6. Medial and final stops Pre-asp Vowel voicing Close smoc ‘smoke’ Vowel voicing Closure snog ‘nice’

  7. Pre-aspiration zoom in Pre-asp Vowel voicing Close smoc ‘smoke’

  8. Pre-aspiration zoom in Breathy Voice Noise Pre-asp Close Close smoc ‘smoke’

  9. Approaches • Ladefoged et al. (1998) • Ní Chasaide (1985) • Sociophonetics and consonants (Foulkes and Docherty 1999)

  10. Research questions • A more complete analysis than Ladefoged et al. (1998) • Is this system undergoing apparent time change?

  11. Methods • Native speakers of Lewis Gaelic • 3 ‘older’ (45-55), 3 ‘younger’ (20-24) • Recording conditions • Word list data • 2257 tokens analysed • Non-parametric statistical tests

  12. Measures: durational • Initial: VOT, vowel • Medial: vowel, modal voice, pre-aspiration, breathy voice, voiceless pre-aspiration, closure, VOT • Final: vowel, modal voice, pre-aspiration, breathy voice, voiceless pre-aspiration, closure

  13. Measures: durational • Segmenting on the waveform in Praat Vowel Modal voice Pre-aspiration BV Noise a c a

  14. Measures: dynamic noise-based • Quantification of noisiness • Anticipatory and carry-over effects (Gobl and Ní Chasaide 1999) • Adapted zero crossing rate (Gordeeva and Scobbie 2010) • Collaborating with Olga ogordeeva@gmail.com • Measure of noise from the glottis in periodic and aperiodic sections • BV measures (HNR, spectral tilt, jitter shimmer) • Standard zero crossings (Bombien 2006)

  15. BP ZCR • BP filtered at 5000Hz and 1.5 x F0 • Effects of filtering (Gordeeva and Scobbie 2010:18) • Perceptual superiority of this measure ‘bus’ unfiltered ‘bus’ filtered

  16. Applied to initial stops càl ‘cabbage’

  17. Results: durational • VOT in initial stops • Effect of place of articulation (cf. Cho and Ladefoged 1999) n = 1285

  18. Results: durational • Vowel length – the action is in the aspirated series (cf. Kessinger and Blumstein 1997) n = 642

  19. Results: BP ZCR – Initial system n = 270

  20. Medial system • Pre-aspiration longer in aspirated series • Some breathy voice in unaspirated • VOT ns. n = 54

  21. Medial system • Vowel length (cf. Ní Chasaide 1985) n = 36 % duration of pre-aspiration word medial /ht/ according to vowel length

  22. Results: BP ZCR – Medial system n = 180

  23. Apparent time change • VOT longer in aspirated series for younger speakers (aspirated series again) n = 642

  24. Results: BP ZCR – Initial change n = 90

  25. Speech rate • Young people speak faster? • Effects on VOT (Allen et al. 2003, Pind 1995) • Ratios Burst VOT Vowel Vowel end Vowel Start Vowel Pre-aspiration Closure

  26. Apparent time change • Pre-aspiration shorter • Pre-aspiration different n = 157 % modal voice, breathy voice and voiceless pre-asp in word medial stops

  27. Results: BP ZCR – Medial change n = 36

  28. Summary of results • YP longer VOT • YP shorter and different pre-aspiration • Benefits of a noise-based dynamic measure • Results suggest can separate phonemic categories and age groups across the syllable

  29. Conclusions: systems • Support for Kessinger and Blumstein (1997): aspirated series show most variation • Phonetically aspiration and pre-aspiration are not the same • BUT aspiration functions as a system: • Vowel length • Change in younger speakers

  30. Conclusions: apparent time change • Pre-aspiration results: • Diachronic instability of pre-aspiration (Silverman 2003) • Influence of English? (Contact, obsolescence…) • Greying of phonemic categories due to lexical attrition • VOT results: • Stops functioning as a system so somehow compensating? • Implications

  31. References • Allen, J., Miller, L., and DeSteno, D., 2003. Individual talker differences invoice-onset-time. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 113:1, pp. 544-552 • Bombien, L., 2006. Voicing alterations in Icelandic – a photoglottographic and acoustic investigation. In J. Harrington, C. Mooshammer, F Kleber, eds., Arbeitsberichte de sInstituts fürPhonetik der Universität Kiel, 37, pp. 63-82. Kiel: Universität Kiel • Cho, T., and Ladefoged, P., 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 endangered languages. Journal of phonetics, 27, pp. 207-229 • Foulkes, P., and Docherty, G., 1999. Urban Voices. London: Arnold • Gobl, C., and Ní Chasaide, A., 1999. Voice source variation in the vowel as a function of consonantal context. In W. J. Hardcastle and N. Hewlett, eds., Coarticulation. Cambridge: CUP. pp. 122-134 • Gordeeva, O., and Scobbie, J., 2010. Preaspiration as a correlate of word-final voice in Scottish English fricatives. In S. Fuchs, M. Toda, M. Zygis, eds., Turbulent sounds: an interdisciplinary guide. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter • Ladefoged, P., Ladefoged, J., Turk, A., St. John, S., 1998. Phonetic structures of Scottish Gaelic. Journal of the international phonetic association, 28, pp. 1-41 • Kessinger, R., and Blumstein, S., 1997. Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset-time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25:2, pp. 143-168 • Laver, J., 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press • Lisker, L., 1957. Closure duration and the intervocalic voiced-voiceless distinction in English. Language, 33:1, pp. 42-49 • Lisker, L., and Abramson, A., 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20, pp. 384-422 • Ní Chasaide, A., 1985. Preaspiration in phonological stop contrasts: an instrumental phonetic study. PhD thesis, University of Bangor • Pind , J . 1995. Speaking rate , voice-onset time , and quantity: The search for higher-order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, pp. 291–304 • Silverman, D., 2003. On the rarity of pre-aspirated stops. Journal of linguistics 39:3, pp. 575-598

  32. Mòran taing Claire Nance and Jane Stuart-Smith c.nance.1@research.gla.ac.uk j.stuart-smith@englang.arts.gla.ac.uk University of Glasgow

  33. A word on breathy voice • Ní Chasaide (1985:139) sees BV as purely physiological • Some evidence to support this: no place effect • Some against: YP have more in velars

  34. Word initial apparent time change • Comparison to Ladefoged et al. (1998) • Word initial /th/ and /t/

  35. Word medial apparent time change • Word medial /hk/, noise and VOT

  36. Closure durations • Closure durations (Lisker 1957) • Longer in aspirated series • We found significantly longer closure durations for coronals and bilabials in the aspirated series

More Related