170 likes | 336 Views
Science with DECIGO. Naoki Seto (Kyoto U) 2008.11.12 The 1st International LISA-DECIGO. Outline . Quick introduction of DECIGO band ①Stochastic Background from early universe ②Binary subtraction problem Other science ③Dark energy ④Intermediate mass black hole (IMBH) Summary.
E N D
Science with DECIGO Naoki Seto (Kyoto U) 2008.11.12 The 1st International LISA-DECIGO
Outline • Quick introduction of DECIGO band • ①Stochastic Background from early universe • ②Binary subtraction problem • Other science • ③Dark energy • ④Intermediate mass black hole (IMBH) • Summary DECIGO shares many interesting (and challenging) aspects with LISA and grand-based detectors
Quick Introduction LISA LIGO,VIRGO,LCGT 2nd generation DECIGO h~10-23~-24 DECIGO correlation 1Hz
Frequency (f~1Hz) LISA High density; compact binaries (NS, stellar mass BH, IMBH,…) WD+WD confusion e.g. Farmer & Phinney 03 DECIGO DECIGO correlation
Signal duration (binaries) Large number (~108) of rotations with frequency evolution 1yr NS+NS@z=1 transient NS+NS Foreground with R~105/yr stationary
Deep Window for GWs from Early universe? Individual NS+NS DECIGO correlation Their foreground (to be removed) Inflation?
Topics in my talk ③Dark Energy with ~105binaries ④IMBH evolution ②Binary Subtraction problem ①GW from Early universe
①Stochastic GW background GW propagation: almost no interaction, not easy to detect, But a crucial fossil from very Early universe!! NASA
GW from Inflation • An important prediction of inflation • Origin: Quantum fluctuation • Energy scale of inflation • Nearly flat spectrum above 10-15Hz (equal time) • 0.1Hz: Largely different scale from CMB scale
DECIGO (fTobs)1/4 DECIGO correlation Correlation analysis Two sets of detectors No overlap with LISA But Tinto et al. 01, Hogan & Bender 01 DECIGO Designed to detect Interesting level with current constraints
Individual NS+NS ②Foreground cleaning is essential! An inevitable problem for GW astronomy NS,BH binaries NS+NS merger rate: ~(10/yr)x(10Gpc/300Mpc)3~105/yr~10-3/sec Other potential foregrounds popIII SNe,…..? (might be a problem) Can we remove NS+NSs?
In principle, Yes • (total fitting parameters)/(data amount) ~(R x Tobs x n) / (f x Tobs) R: merger rate Tobs: observational time n: number of fitting parameters for individual binaries~10 f: band width ~ freqeuncy ~10-3 101 /1=10-2<<1 mass, direction,…
In reality… • large cycle;~108 • need huge number of templates • ~1040 templates for 1yr integration • full coherent integration; difficult • even with Moore’s law extrapolated to ~2020 • need efficient detection method • LISA(WD+WD, EMRI), LIGO-pulsar search • mock LISA data challenge, Einstein@home,... • requirement for detector sensitivity and configuration • must detect them in short integration time • no dead angles • ongoing: careful evaluation for sensitivity and configuration Cuter&Harms 06 (for BBO)
③Science with NS+NSs • Basic characters • Huge number: ~105/yr • Excellent clocks • SNR: weak dependence on redshift z • asymptotically (1+z)1/6 • Short GRB? or EMW counterpart • GW localization: ~1min2 with three sets • redshift estimation • Dark energy • dL-z relation, only with basic physics • Probes for high redshift universe?
④BH (stellar, intermediate mass) • IMBH:highly unknown • rate, formation and evolution? • detectable with high SNR even at high-z • 1000+1000Msun@z=1: SNR>103 • clue to understand SMBH? • BH+NS • test for general relativity (Yagi)
Summary • Interesting science with DECIGO • GW background form early universe • 1Hz: (potential) deep window for GWs • direct detection of inflation background(?), …. • Foreground cleaning is essential!! • LISA (WD+WD,EMRI), Ground-base (unknown pulsars) • NS+NS: ~105 good clocks available • use them for cosmology and astrophysics • IMBHs and more