180 likes | 325 Views
FAA AIRSPACE REDESIGN. over Pound Ridge. The How it Started. First Week in August 2007: Abrupt dramatic increase in volume of aircraft flyover:
E N D
FAA AIRSPACE REDESIGN over Pound Ridge
The How it Started • First Week in August 2007: Abrupt dramatic increase in volume of aircraft flyover: Regional jets, commercial jumbo jets, 757, helecoptors seen flying over portions of Pound Ridge, Specifically Ward reservation, Mianus River Gorge, Scotts Corners, Cross River, Parts of Bedford & others Flights every 3 minutes
What’s that Noise? • CHOKE POINT INITIATIVE • Implementation of airspace redesign began in 2007 thru 2011. Pound Ridge we will be impacted by some portion of: • 550 La Guardia Arrivals per day • 460 arrivals & departures per day at Westchester* • 225 arrivals & departures per day at Stewart* • 578 arrivals & departures per day at Teterboro • Variable Helecoptor & Corporate Jet Directional Traffic to Carmel VOR • *non-inclusive of scheduled expansion efforts
Introducing the FAA’s Plan • NY NJ PA Airspace Redesign • Started in 1989 • Part of the “Next Generation Project” • Biggest Airspace Redesign in 50 years • Plagued by project management breakdowns, funding problems flawed models, invalid data, insufficient testing • Audited by the GAO twice with poor review and major concerns notes in 2005
The Design • Multi-layer airspace (new classification) • Fly planes closer to eachother (from 5 to 3) • Duel Landings on parallell runways* • Continuous Descent Approach • Lower altitude flight over land to accommodate more traffic & new approach • Significant increase in Risk
Draft Environmental Impact Study • Many notable organizations were involved in the phase 1 design to produce reports giving guidance according to their specialty. • The Draft Statement (DEIS) is flawed, non inclusive of all impacted areas and does not take into account the recommendations produced in the design phase • Not enough Study Points • Data corruption • Incorrect assumptions • Land use change & Re-classification
FEIS • Includes inconsistencies, flawed assumptions • Mitigated routes were not discussed with newly impacted communities. Unethical. • Park land, sanctuaries, water sources, conservation land, nature trails and Bird sanctuaries are newly used as mitigated routes. They do this without contacting their custodians. • Utilizing these lands is a violation of Environmental Law without study or involvement of resource directors.
Record of Decision • Factually inaccurate • Overstatement of public involvement • Statistical misrepresentation. • Land use change • Actionable
Safety Risks • FAA provided no Risk vs. Gain studies on: • Low altitude navigation risks • Dual Landing risks demonstrated in operative setting • Safe Distance Rule Decrease • Bird Strike Hazard Increase • National Security Risk of Nuclear Power Plant Flyover • Fuel Jettison over land • Emergency Management • Disaster Preparedness not addressed • ‘Aluminum Shower’ over park land Risk
Environmental Risks Aircraft Emissions Water Quality • Wetland contamination • New York City Water Supply Air Quality • Human Health Risk • Ecosystem disturbance • Endangered Species Extinction Noise • Change of Land Use • Harmonic Vibration and historic structures
Indirect Impact • Land Value • Change of Land Use Classification • FAA’s Removal of “Quiet Setting” from rural areas, parkland, native sanctuaries like Pound Ridge is a change of land use. This defacto incorporates our community into a navigational easement. • Human Health Risks due to Aircraft Emissions • Asthma • Lung and liver cancer • Heart Disease
To Do • Stop the FAA from implementation • Protect our community and Parks land use • Roll back the routing changes • Follow environmental law protecting park land, native forest, Bird Sanctuaries, rural • Conduct the necessary Impact Studies • Communicate to all impacted area leaders. • Provide ethical mitigation strategies • Educate yourself on the facts • Go to ourairspace.org for scientific Studies, To Do Lists, Contact Lists and News