1 / 12

The views expressed are those of the discussant and not those of the IDB or its Executive Board.

Discussion of “Deconstructing the Backus-Smith Puzzle: Non-traded Good Prices, Terms of Trade, and Risk Sharing By G. Corsetti , L. Dedola , and F. Viani. Alessandro Rebucci Inter-American Development Bank Risk Sharing Conference, October 22-23, 2010.

annora
Download Presentation

The views expressed are those of the discussant and not those of the IDB or its Executive Board.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Discussion of“Deconstructing the Backus-Smith Puzzle: Non-traded Good Prices, Terms of Trade, and Risk SharingBy G. Corsetti, L. Dedola, and F. Viani Alessandro Rebucci Inter-American Development Bank Risk Sharing Conference, October 22-23, 2010 The views expressed are those of the discussant and not those of the IDB or its Executive Board.

  2. What does the paper do? • Revisits the Backus-Smith stylized facts using spectral analysis • Decomposes BS statistics into traded and non-traded prices: Corr(rc,rer) = [ρ(rc,pT)σ(pT)/σ(rer)] + [ρ(rc,pNT)σ(pNT)/σ(rer)] • Uses evidence for a “horse race” between alternative mechanisms that can resolve the puzzle: • Wealth effects of ToT changes under low ω • BBS effects of traded TFP shocks and high ω

  3. What does the paper find? • Some interesting differences in BS statistics across differences frequencies: • BS puzzle stronger at lower frequencies • “Spectral analysis underscores that … the BS statistics computed with first differences … gives a distorted picture of most relations.” • Some evidence consistent the second mechanism • At least my guess of what the authors will say

  4. First set: new stylized facts on BS don’t bring many news: • The cospectra don’t behave much differently than the correlations • Motivation for doing this? • The paper is really about splitting the rer in the BC statistic in traded and non-traded prices. • But I am intrigued by Figure 1 and 2: • We know about exchange rate predictability • We know they may be related • Worth digging more, changing window • How did you choose the windows for the averages in the tables?

  5. Table from paper

  6. Chart from paper

  7. Is the horse race set up fairly? • Both components are negative at least at low frequency • Both mechanism at work • Evidence favors second mechanism at higher frequency, but evidence on TFP and sigma is not evaluted • With enough free parameters …

  8. Picture from IMF Staff Paper on TFP

  9. Wishful thinking: • Can the factor discussed explained also other puzzles? Or are there explanations of other puzzles that can help better understand BS one? • Analysis of deviations from low of one price is still missing • May be some interesting surprises from there

  10. To conclude • Interesting new paper in a series: rigorous and thoughtful • Needs to motivate better spectral analysis and particularly the choice of windows • Horse race need to be completed for the reader to buy implicit conclusions

  11. Thank you

More Related