1 / 5

An intercomparison of the surface energy budget over the South Pole

Hello!. An intercomparison of the surface energy budget over the South Pole between observations, ERA-40, and the Mod èle Atmosph é rique R é gional. M. Town 1 , I. Gorodetskaya 2 , H. Gall ée 3 , V. P. Walden 4 , C. Genthon 3.

annot
Download Presentation

An intercomparison of the surface energy budget over the South Pole

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hello! An intercomparison of the surface energy budget over the South Pole between observations, ERA-40, and the ModèleAtmosphérique Régional M. Town1, I. Gorodetskaya2, H. Gallée3, V. P. Walden4, C. Genthon3 1Seattle University, Seattle WA USA (michael.s.town.atmos@gmail.com) 2Department of Earth and Env Sciences,Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium 3LGGE/CNRS,Grenoble, France 4Department of Geography,University of Idaho, Moscow, ID USA We evaluate MAR and ERA-40 using several complementary analysis methods.

  2. An intercomparison of the surface energy budget over the South Pole between observations, ERA-40, and the ModèleAtmosphérique Régional M. Town1, I. Gorodetskaya2, H. Gallée3, V. P. Walden4, C. Genthon3 1Seattle University, Seattle WA USA (michael.s.town.atmos@gmail.com) 2Department of Earth and Env Sciences,Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium 3LGGE/CNRS,Grenoble, France 4Department of Geography,University of Idaho, Moscow, ID USA case study - informative, but qualitative

  3. An intercomparison of the surface energy budget over the South Pole between observations, ERA-40, and the ModèleAtmosphérique Régional M. Town1, I. Gorodetskaya2, H. Gallée3, V. P. Walden4, C. Genthon3 1Seattle University, Seattle WA USA (michael.s.town.atmos@gmail.com) 2Department of Earth and Env Sciences,Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium 3LGGE/CNRS,Grenoble, France 4Department of Geography,University of Idaho, Moscow, ID USA regression - quantitative, but penalizes for errors in timing and bias.

  4. An intercomparison of the surface energy budget over the South Pole between observations, ERA-40, and the ModèleAtmosphérique Régional M. Town1, I. Gorodetskaya2, H. Gallée3, V. P. Walden4, C. Genthon3 1Seattle University, Seattle WA USA (michael.s.town.atmos@gmail.com) 2Department of Earth and Env Sciences,Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium 3LGGE/CNRS,Grenoble, France 4Department of Geography,University of Idaho, Moscow, ID USA spectral - quantitative, assesses power as a function of frequency regardless of timing.

  5. An intercomparison of the surface energy budget over the South Pole between observations, ERA-40, and the ModèleAtmosphérique Régional M. Town1, I. Gorodetskaya2, H. Gallée3, V. P. Walden4, C. Genthon3 1Seattle University, Seattle WA USA (michael.s.town.atmos@gmail.com) 2Department of Earth and Env Sciences,Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium 3LGGE/CNRS,Grenoble, France 4Department of Geography,University of Idaho, Moscow, ID USA We evaluate MAR and ERA-40 using several complementary analysis methods. In general, MAR is an improvement over ERA-40 in simulating surface temperature and the surface energy budget at the South Pole.

More Related