280 likes | 448 Views
Patterns of innovation in Green-ICTs: A patent-based analysis. Nicoletta CORROCHER # Grazia CECERE* Müge ÖZMAN* Cédric GOSSART* # KITeS, Bocconi University, Milan * Télécom Ecole de Management, Institut Mines-Télécom, Paris. ECOPATENTS project funded by ADEME
E N D
Patterns of innovation in Green-ICTs: A patent-based analysis Nicoletta CORROCHER# Grazia CECERE* Müge ÖZMAN* Cédric GOSSART* # KITeS, Bocconi University, Milan * Télécom Ecole de Management, Institut Mines-Télécom, Paris ECOPATENTS project funded by ADEME http://ecopatents.wp.mines-telecom.fr/
Outline • Introduction • Literature • Methodology & Data • Results • Implications for future research
Introduction 1. Introduction http://ecoinfo.cnrs.fr Period of crises: not only economic... Way out: eco-innovations? Ecoinnovations: within ICTs? ICTs: significant ecological impacts. ICTs: decoupling potential (green ICTs)+ job creation. Research challenge: integration of ecological issues into innovation studies.
1. Introduction Well being Natural resources time Decoupling: Role of (green) Information & Communication Technologies? ICTs ? 2012
1. Introduction Green ICTs(hardware + software) Reduce negative ecological impacts + create jobs: • Direct impacts: ICTs reduce their own ecological impacts. • Enabling impacts: ICTs are used by other sectors to reduce ecological impacts. • Systemic impacts: The diffusion of ICTs enable structural changes towards sustainable development (absolute decoupling). Source: Hilty, L. (2008), Information Technology and Sustainability: Essays on the Relationships between Information Technology and Sustainable Development, Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
1. Introduction ICTs & the environment Source: Hilty (2008: 147). Green ICTs Ecological impacts of ICTs
1. Introduction Long term impacts of green ICTs: Absolute decoupling ICTs ? Well being Relative decoupling Absolute decoupling Natural resources time
2. Literature Ecoinnovation & patents • Increasing number of studies using patents to analyse ecoinnovation (cf. lit. rev. in our paper: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2117831). • The propensity to patent varies across sectors including for ecotechnologies (=> which ones are the most dynamic?). • Ecoinnovation studies cover different technological domains, e.g. automobile, waste, water, air cleaning (not ICTs).
Objective & Questions 3. Methodology & Data Objective: Examine the emergence and dynamics of green ICT technological domains. Question: What are the patterns of innovative activity in green ICT technological domains, notably in terms of: • Growth of patents • Concentration of innovative activities by organizations and countries • Entry of firms • Technological pervasiveness • Sources of knowledge
3. Methodology & Data Data Construction of our green ICT technological domain: • WIPO Green Inventory - includes all IPC classes associated with environmentally friendly technologies in different fields (6 technological fields: alternative energy production, transportation, energy conservation, waste management, agriculture/forestry, administrative/regulatory as well as design aspects, and nuclear power generation). • OECD classification of ICTs - includes IPC classes referring to telecoms, consumer electronics, computer and office machinery, other ICTs.
International Patent Classification (IPC) codes: 3 sets of IPC classes to construct our sample 3. Methodology & Data Green (WIPO) ICTs (OECD) Pure Green ICTs
3. Methodology & Data Methodology (3 steps) • Select EPO patents that have at least 1 green and 1 ICT technological class (at 7 digit level) granted between 1986 and 2006 (=> 4157 classes: 1151 Green ICT, 3442 ICT, 436 Pure Green ICT; 16601 patents). • Select couples of IPC classes that have at least 55 patents (top 1% couples in order to consider the most relevant fields) => 13210 patents. • Analyse Green ICT technological domains & components (network analysis on the classes + explore what are the sources of knowledge used in Green ICTs).
4. Results Results: Network analysis 65 green ICT technological fields (1 node = 1 pair of classes; 1 line = 1 patent)
4. Results The components of green ICT technological fields
4. Results Patents & IPC classes in green ICT fields
4. Results Annual growth rate of patents in Green ICTs (1987-2006) OLED Average = 0,34 (34%)
4. Results Firms with the highest number of Green ICT patents
4. Results Top 3 organisations by Green ICT technological component
4. Results Top 3 innovative countries in Green ICT technological domains
4. Results Top 3 innovative countries in Green ICT technological domains (cont.) EU
Patterns of innovative activity in Green ICTs Growth of patents over time Different types of indices: Country concentration (HHI index)* Organization concentration (HHI index)* Entry of new patenting firms Technological pervasiveness: the extent to which domains spread across different IPC classes (Jaffe et al., 1993)* Knowledge source across technological classes-variety of knowledge (Trajetenberg et al., 2002)* Internal knowledge sources Academic sources of knowledge * Using the method suggested by Hall (2002). 4. Results
4. Results Descriptive statistics(1987-2006)
4. Results Cluster analysis: 3 different clusters of technological domains Examples: Semiconductors/ Electronic commerce Examples: Traffic control systems/ Electricity storage & measurement Examples: SSD organic / Tech. for elec. & magn. measurement Little innovation by new entrants in a fast growing cluster => New knowledge acquired outside? High level of opportunity Continuous opportunities for the entry of new actors Low degree of knowledge cumulativeness => Radical changes?
5. Implications for future research Conclusions about innovation dynamics in Green ICTs • Green ICTs cover 65 technological domains (different combinations of green & ICT classes). • Fastest growing domain = SSD using organic materials (Germany strongest EU country). • France: strong in Secure electronic commerce & Hall effect devices (thanks to CNRS). • LEDs = promising Green ICT: potential for job creation in Europe? (cf. FP7 cycLED project: http://www.cyc-led.eu). • Current set of technological classes in Green Inventory neglects important green ICT domains that stem from the combination of existing green and ICT classes. • 3 main clusters of green ICT domains (Green, Emerging, Established) that differ substantially in the structure of their innovative activity.
Thank you for your attention. Nicoletta CORROCHER# Grazia CECERE* Müge ÖZMAN* Cédric GOSSART* # KITeS, Bocconi University, Milan * Télécom Ecole de Management, Institut Mines-Télécom, Paris ECOPATENTS project http://ecopatents.wp.mines-telecom.fr/
Co-evolution: between human societies & natural ecosystems Natural ecosystems Life support services Waste sinks Human societies Capital stock I Energy K Source: Common & Stagl (2006), Ecological Economics, p. 87. C Production (Firms) Consumption (Households) L Resources Amenities
Systemic changes towards absolute decoupling Source: Tukker, A. and M. Butter (2007). "Governance of sustainable transitions: about the 4(0) ways to change the world." Journal of Cleaner Production 15(1): 94-103.
1. Introduction Key sectors ? Key resources Source: Dodgson, M. (2000). The Management of Technological Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 19.