1 / 5

Bandwidth Constraints Models for Diffserv-aware MPLS TE: Performance Evaluation

Bandwidth Constraints Models for Diffserv-aware MPLS TE: Performance Evaluation <draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-03.txt> IETF’58 TEWG Meeting Minneapolis, November 13, 2003 Wai Sum Lai AT&T Labs wlai@att.com. What’s changed More explanatory text BC model design considerations New sections

Download Presentation

Bandwidth Constraints Models for Diffserv-aware MPLS TE: Performance Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bandwidth Constraints Models for Diffserv-aware MPLS TE: Performance Evaluation <draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-03.txt> IETF’58 TEWG Meeting Minneapolis, November 13, 2003 Wai Sum Lai AT&T Labs wlai@att.com

  2. What’s changed • More explanatory text • BC model design considerations • New sections • Improving Class 2 Performance at the Expense of Class 3 • Comparing Bandwidth Constraints of Different Models

  3. Operational Characteristics General trade-off • bandwidth sharing to achieve greater efficiency under normal conditions • robust class protection/isolation under overload Russian Dolls Model • higher degree of sharing allowed • leads to its inability to offer robust class isolation under overload conditions Maximum Allocation Model • each class has its own bandwidth access limits • leads to reduced degree of interference among the different classes

  4. Performance Comparison Russian Dolls Model • allows greater sharing of bandwidth among different classes • performs somewhat better under normal conditions • works well when preemption is fully enabled • under partial preemption, not all preemption modes work equally well Maximum Allocation Model • does not depend on the use of preemption • is relatively insensitive to the different preemption modes when preemption is used • provides more robust class isolation under overload

  5. Next Step As agreed in the last two meetings, to progress as an individual submission, with review by the TEWG

More Related