1 / 15

Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation.

Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA University of Texas Brownsville. Why ?. Astrophysical searches estimate efficiency from playground data. Extrig search – how representative is the’off-source’ segment of the ‘on-source’ one ?.

aoife
Download Presentation

Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Interferometric Data Modeling: Issues in realistic data generation. Soma Mukherjee CGWA University of Texas Brownsville Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  2. Why ? • Astrophysical searches estimate efficiency from playground data. • Extrig search – how representative is the’off-source’ segment of the ‘on-source’ one ? Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  3. Data Modeling: Basis • Interferometric data has three components : lines, transients and noise floor. • As a first approximation, the three components are independent and appear additively. • Physically different sources for each • Basic idea is to split a channel into these components with mutual exclusion • Classify Transients, fit ARMA models to line amplitude and phase modulation, ARMA models for noise floor rms Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  4. Issue I :Slowly drifting noise floor • Data from present generation of interferometers is non-stationary. Results obtained by running MNFT1 on a stretch of LIGO S2 data.[1Mukherjee, CQG, 2003] Low pass and resample Estimate spectral Noise floor with Running Median Whiten data using FIR whitening Filter. Set threshold Compute Running Median of the Squared timeseries Clean lines and Highpass Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  5. Issue II : Modeling ALL lines MBLT1 : Non-parametric Line estimation. [1 Mohanty CQG, 2001] Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  6. Issue III : Transient Clasification KSCDKolmogorv-Smirnov test based Change point Detector Mohanty, PRD (2000); Mohanty, GWDAW (2002) 12 top wavelet coefficients of data surrounding each KSCD trigger. Visualized using GGobi. (Preliminary). Mukherjee, 2003, Amaldi, Pisa Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  7. Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  8. MNFT outline: Algorithm: • Lowpass and resample given timeseries x(k). • Construct FIR filter that whitens the noise floor. Resulting timeseries : w(k) • Remove lines using notch filter. Cleaned timeseries : c(k) • Track variation in second moment of c(k) using Running Median and apply smoothing (SRM). • Obtain significance levels of the sampling distribution via Monte Carlo simulations. Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  9. Model Noise Generation • Model Noise Floor (low order ARMA). • Estimate lines, model amplitude and phase, add reconstructed lines to synthetic data . • Add transients . Use MNFT to Compute smoothed Running Median Fit ARMA to the SRM Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  10. ARMA (p,q) A(q) y(t) = C(q) e(t) Y(t) : Output e(t) : White noise C(q)/A(q) : Transfer function q: Time shift operator A and C : Polynomials Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  11. How faithful is the model ? Apply statistical tests of hypothesis • Kolmogorov-Smirnov • Akaike Information criterion Iakaike (p,q) = ln s2 p,q + 2 (p+q)/N Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  12. Result I : Noise floor model – ARMA (12,7) Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  13. Result II : Line Amplitude - ARMA (27,11) Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  14. Line model : Amplitude & Phase Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

  15. Comments • Applicable to band limited data. • Use as an ‘infinite’ playground for astrophysical searches. • Gives a better handle on non-stationarity and hence testing the robustness of the search algorithm. • Allows us to do ‘controlled tests’. • Signal injection and efficiency estimation Soma Mukherjee GWDAW8, Milwaukee, Dec. 17-20'03

More Related