820 likes | 993 Views
Down and Up Along the Proton Dripline. Heavy One-Proton Emitter Light One-Proton Emitter Light Two-Proton Emitter Heavy Two Proton Emitter. 40. Centrifugal (l=5). 20. Coulomb. V (MeV). 0. 40. 20. Radius (fm). -20. Nuclear. -40. -60. Proton Radioactivity. 151. Lu. 71. 80. 20.
E N D
Down and Up Along the Proton Dripline Heavy One-Proton Emitter Light One-Proton Emitter Light Two-Proton Emitter Heavy Two Proton Emitter
40 Centrifugal (l=5) 20 Coulomb V (MeV) 0 40 20 Radius (fm) -20 Nuclear -40 -60 Proton Radioactivity
151 Lu 71 80 20 l=5 E=1.25 MeV V (MeV) 0 40 80 60 20 Radius (fm) -20 T1/2(l=0) = 3ms l=0 T1/2(l=5) = 81ms -40 Strong Influence on Angular Momentum
Heavy Proton Emitter • Long lifetimes due to Coulomb and angular momentum barrier • Produce in fusion evaporation reactions or fragmentation • Separate and subsequently stop in a detector for identification • Use segmented silicon strip detectors for a delayed decay
1p Separation Energies (Odd p-numbers) T. Radon et al., Pramana 53 (1999) 69
1p Separation Energies (Even p-numbers) T. Radon et al., Pramana 53 (1999) 69
Structure and Deformed Emitters J. Uusitalo et al. 155Ta T. N. Ginter et al. 150Lu A. A. Sonzogni et al. 131Eu, 141Ho, 145Tm K. S. Toth et al. 151Lu C. J. Gross et al. 113Cs K. Rykaczewski et al. 140Ho,141Ho P. J. Woods and C. N. Davids, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 47 (1997) 541
Q-Values and Branching Ratios 167Ir 161Re C. N. Davids et al., Phys. Rev. C 55, (1997) 2255 R. J. Irvine et al., Phys. Rev. C 55 (1997) R1621
“Short”-Lived Proton Emitters C.R. Bingham et al.
100Sn K. Sümmerer et al., Nucl. Phys. A616 (1997) 341c
rp - Process Mo 83 84 B. Blank, J. Phys. G 24 (1998) 1385 Nb 81 82 83 Zr 79 80 M. F. Mohar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1571 B. Blank et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2893 49 50 51 52 53 Co 50 51 52 Fe 45 46 47 48 49 50
New Isotopes Along the Dripline B. Blank et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2893 B. Blank, J. Phys. G 24 (1998) 1385
Prompt Decay from a Well-Deformed Band p g D. Rudolph et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 3018
52 26Fe26 53 26Fe27 First Proton Radioactivity (19/2-) 12 3.19 247 ms 0.84 2+ 1.5% 0 0+ 10 b+ (7/2-) 0 8 53 27Co26 Energy (MeV) 6 4 19/2- 3.04 2 0 7/2- 0 Joseph Cerny and J. C. Hardy, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 27 (1977) 333
b-Delayed Proton Emitters S. Czajkowski et al., Nucl. Phys. A628 (1998) 537
Light Proton Emitter • (Very) short lifetimes due to small Coulomb and no or very small angular momentum barrier (l=0,1,2) • Produce in transfer reactions or fragmentation • Identify by complete kinematic reconstruction in flight
Definition of Radioactivity “…should lead to lifetimes longer than 10-12 sec, a possible lower limit for the process to be called radioactivity.” Joseph Cerny and J. C. Hardy, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 27 (1977) 333
Search for Di-Proton Emitters • Predicted by Goldansky in 1960 • Until recently (?) elusive • In-Flight Decay (Short lifetimes) • Ground State • Excited States • Resonance Scattering • Coulomb Excitation • Neutron-Stripping • Implantation/Decay (Long lifetimes) • Beta-Delayed Emitters • Ground-State Emitters
11N+p 12O 10C+2p 11N+p 11N+p 12O 12O 10C+2p 10C+2p 12O 12O 11N+p 10C+2p 10C+p+p 10C+p+p Definitions Di-Proton Decay Simultaneous Decay Sequential Decay 12O 10C+p+p
Three Body Model L. V. Grigorenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 22
Three-Body Decay Paths L. V. Grigorenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 22
Two-Proton Decay of 6Be (2+) 1.67 (3/2-) 0.59 (0+) g.s. 5Li+p 6Be -1.37 4He+2p D.F. Geesaman et al., Phys. Rev. C15 (1977) 1835
Decay Energy Spectrum of 12O EDecay = 1.77 MeV G = 575 keV
Two-Proton Angular Distribution Di-Proton Sequential
11N+p 12O 10C+2p 12O 11N+p 10C+p+p Decay Width Sequential Decay However: Γcalc 10 keV Γmeasured = 575 keV
Elastic Resonance Scattering L. Axelsson et al., Phys. Rev. C 54 (1996) R1511
Ground State of 11N A. Azhari, et al. Phys. Rev. C57, 628 (1998) J. M. Oliviera, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 628 (2000) K. Markenroth, et al. Phys. Rev. C62, 034308 (1998) 1.45 MeV 1.63 MeV 1.27 MeV 11N
Two Proton Decay of 12O Old 2.0 MeV 1.8 MeV ?? New 1.8 MeV ~1.5 MeV 11N+p 12O 10C+2p
Di-Proton Decay of 16Ne? L. V. Grigorenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 042502
New Shell Structure? ?? Z=8 N=20 N=16 ? N=8
Vanishing of the Proton Z=8 Shell ? Z=8 5Li – 9B – 13N – 17F 7B – 11N – 15F 11N (-1.92MeV)
Vanishing of the Proton Z=8 Shell ? 15F ?? 11N (-1.27MeV)
Mass of 15F ?? 15F ?? 11N
Previous 15F Measurement Binding Energy of 15F : –1.47 MeV = 1 MeV G. J. KeKelis et al., Phys. Rev. C 17, 1929 (1978)
Theoretical Prediction S. Grevy, O. Sorlin, and N. Vinh Mau, Phys. Rev. C56 (1997) 2885
2% 87% 11% Invariant Mass Measurements at GANIL • Primary Beam: 24Mg • Secondary Beams:20Mg, 18Ne, 17F • Fragments Energies:35-43 MeV/nucleon • Stripping Reactions • Detectors:SPEG SpectrometerMUST array
15F 14O + p Relative to KeKelis et al. Binding Energy of 15F : Egs = –1.00 0.08MeV = 1.23 0.22MeV T. Zerguerras et al., to be published
Mass of 15F !! 15F !! 11N
Two Proton Decay of 16Ne Old 15F 1.5 MeV 1.4 MeV ?? New 1.4 MeV 1.0 MeV 15F+p 16Ne 14O+2p
Two Proton Decay of 19Mg ?? Theoretical Predictions ~1.8 MeV • Masses of 19Mg and 18Na are not known • Stripping reactions:20Mg 18Na 17Ne + p20Mg 19Mg 17Ne + 2p ~1.2 MeV ?? 19Mg 18Na+p 17F+2p
First Measurement of the Mass of 18Na Binding Energy of 18Na : Egs = –0.411 0.05 MeV = 0.34 0.09 MeV • No events observed for20Mg 19Mg 18Na + 2p
Decay of 19Mg Sequential ?? • Two-Proton Decay will most likely be sequential.. • .. unless the mass of 19Mg is also underpredicted • Measure the mass of 19Mg ~1.2 MeV 0.41 MeV 19Mg 18Na+p 17F+2p
9.72 3.51 3/2+ 2+ 2He 7.77 Sequential 0+ 0 6.59 2.37 1/2+ 12C+2p 5.17 13N+p 6.57 4.63 0+ 14O Two-Proton Decay of 14O* C.R. Bain et al., Phys. Lett. B373 (1996) 35