1 / 25

Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (SRS)

Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (SRS). Joanne Keene, Government Relations Director Siri Mullaney, Budget Manager. History of the “Contract” with Rural Communities. 1891: Forest Reserve Act enacted, 40 million acres of forest lands are placed in Forest Reserves.

aquila
Download Presentation

Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (SRS)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (SRS) Joanne Keene, Government Relations Director Siri Mullaney, Budget Manager

  2. History of the “Contract” with Rural Communities • 1891: Forest Reserve Act enacted, 40 million acres of forest lands are placed in Forest Reserves. • 1905: Forest Reserves renamed National Forests. • 1906: President Roosevelt proposed revenue sharing to promote multi-use conservation on forested lands.

  3. History Continued • 1908: Congress passes a 25% revenue sharing program (25% of receipts returned to counties) to support roads and public schools. • 1980s: National policies diminish ability to generate revenue from National Forests • 1998: Revenues from national forest activities and payments decline by 70%

  4. History Continued • 1998: National Forest Counties and Schools Coalition is formed to promote multiple use management of and secure payments to forested counties and rural schools • 2000: SRS signed into law • 2007 SRS extension • 2008 SRS reauthorization

  5. Current Status of SRS • SRS reauthorization expires September 30, 2011 • Coconino County currently working with National Association of Counties and the Forest Counties Schools Coalition on reauthorization

  6. Purpose of SRS • Stabilize and transition payments to county schools and roads • Invest in the land and create employment opportunities • Improve cooperative relationships among the people that use and care for Federal lands

  7. Components of SRS • Title I: Payments to rural counties for road maintenance and education • Title II: Payments to Resource Advisory Committees for forest restoration and enhancement projects • Title III: Payments for reimbursement of emergency services performed on federal lands

  8. Annual Payment • Counties receive payment each year • Payments generally will be made in December for the fiscal year ending September 30. • Title I and Title III funds are paid to states to be distributed to counties • Title II funds are held in a Forest Service account to pay for approved projects

  9. SRS Receipts in Coconino County • In FY10, Coconino County received $4,449,023.63 • Schools/Roads each receive $1,738,737 • $326,287 will be allocated to Title III projects • Funding for search and rescue etc, community forestry, fire prevention etc.

  10. Title I Funds • Title I funds distributed 50/50 to schools/roads • Coconino County receives approximately $4.5 million • $4.156 Million in Title I • $342,317 in Title III • County currently maintains more than 300 miles of roads

  11. Use of Funds • Title II funds unobligated in one fiscal year shall be available in the following year. • The 2008 reauthorization required the formation of a RAC in order spend these dollars • Authority to initiate Title II and Title III projects ends September 30, 2011 • Title II and III funds not obligated by September 30, 2012 shall be returned to U.S. Treasury

  12. Title III – County Funds • 2008 Reauthorization made changes in Title III • Narrows the activities eligible for funding • Requires county to return unobligated funds by September 30, 2012, to U.S. Treasury.

  13. Title III – County Funds Funds may be used only for 3 purposes • Firewise Communities program • Reimbursement for emergency services on federal land paid for by the county • Develop community wildfire protection plans (CWPPs)

  14. Title III History • 2000 Act: Allocate to Title II OR Title III • 2000 Act: Title III Allocation of 18.2% ($600,000-$750,000) • 2000 Act: Broader funding scope

  15. Title III History • Act Reauthorization: no more than 7% to Title III • Act Reauthorization: $300,000-$400,000 Allocation • Act Reauthorization: Scope Limited

  16. Title III Comment Period • Coconino County Title III Comment Period: September 27 – November 11th • Project Adoption: November 16th • Project List: Handout

  17. Prior Title III Initiatives • Community Cleanups • Blue ridge and Sitgreave Community Wildfire Protection Plan Administration • Greater Flagstaff Forest Partnership • Forest Service Litter IGA

  18. Prior Title III Initiatives(Continued) • CREC: Forest Health • CREC: Forest Education • Parks & Recreation: Trails Planning, Crews & Easements • Parks & Recreation: Fire Prevention

  19. Prior Title III Initiatives(Continued) • Community Development: Comprehensive Plan Update • GIS: Aerial Mapping • Sheriff: Search & Rescue Capital

  20. SRS Funding • SRS provides funds to 729 rural Burroughs, Counties and Parishes • Provides education dollars for 9 million students • Coconino County received or is scheduled to receive: • $5.6 million in FY08 • $5.05 million in FY09 • $4.54 million in FY10 • $4.09 million in FY11

  21. Advocacy Efforts • If this Act is not reauthorized after FY11, the County will have a reduced ability to fund road maintenance projects and wildfire protection, search and rescue and patrol activities of Federal land. • The School Districts would be severely impacted in their ability to maintain the same level of service currently provided to students.

  22. Advocacy Efforts • Failure to extend the SRSCA would lead to an annual payment loss of $468 million dollars starting in 2012-13. • There will be an economic impact to construction, roads, education, conservation, and various other government funded services and projects. • The loss of the funding is estimated to lead to various businesses throughout the United States, mainly in rural America, losing on an annual basis almost $1.37 billion in revenues, government at all levels losing over $188 million in tax receipts and over 11,000 people losing their jobs in 2012-13.*

  23. Advocacy Efforts • Counties are asking members of Congress to urge the Administration to include a long-term reauthorization of SRS, and funding in the 2012 budget request to Congress • Working with Congress on reauthorization

  24. Questions?

More Related