420 likes | 580 Views
Student Group Work: Collaboration or Catastrophe?. Michelle Toth Feinberg Library SUNY Plattsburgh tothmm@plattsburgh.edu. What was your experience with group work in college?. What are the down sides of group work?. Why Group Work Sucks. Free-riders, loafers Hoarders Too time consuming
E N D
Student Group Work: Collaboration or Catastrophe? Michelle TothFeinberg LibrarySUNY Plattsburgh tothmm@plattsburgh.edu
Why Group Work Sucks • Free-riders, loafers • Hoarders • Too time consuming • Difficult to schedule time out of class
Why Group Work Sucks • It is inefficient • Different expectations for the work/assignment • Don’t know how to work in groups • Anxiety about grades • Lacks fairness and accountability
Benefits of Group Work Outside reasons: • Develops skills that can be used outside of school • Employers value it • Accreditation agencies require it
Benefits of Group Work Students (interpersonal): • Social interaction, get to know others • Social support for at-risk students • Communication, dialog skills • Learn to collaborate • Work on negotiation, compromise and conflict resolution
Benefits of Group Work Students (learning): • Exposed to diverse viewpoints/perspectives • More/better ideas and solutions to problems • Greater meta-cognition of learning • Higher order learning: analysis, application • Project management, problem solving
Benefits of Group Work Teaching/Learning process: • Active learning • Students more engaged, on task • Improved learning outcomes, applying knowledge • Increased participation
Benefits of Group Work For Instructors: • Decreased grading load (maybe) • More time to reflect on students’ learning • Delegating authority – students more responsible for their own learning • Opportunities to re-teach, without holding others back • Maintaining faculty’s enthusiasm for teaching
For Every Instruction Situation, a Group Project Possibility • Course-related one-shots • In a computer classroom • In a lecture hall • Instructor assigned groups • Librarian created groups
For Every Instruction Situation, a Group Project Possibility • Online courses • Embedded as support for online groups • Library credit courses • On-campus • Online
Best Grouping Practices • Consensus in research on groups – groups should be small, between 3-5, some say 4 or less. • There is no one best way of assigning groups. • Heterogeneous vs. Homogeneous • Self-Selecting vs. Assigned
Ways of Grouping • Who you are sitting next to • Random (1,2,3, - 1,2,3, etc…) • Astrological Sign • Students self-select groups
Ways of Grouping • By Major • Interest in topics • Quiz scores • Skill sets • Schedule availability • Myers-Briggs (or other assessment) • Software - Team Maker
To Consider While Grouping • Race / gender / age • International students • Grade / GPA • Outside commitments • Geographic location (online students)
Barriers to Good Group Work • Individual student characteristics and motivation • Previous bad group/team experiences • No training, understanding of group work • Instructor not explaining the benefits/purpose of group work • Unclear directions – kills time & creates conflict
Teaching Students about Groups • Critique how other groups work • Hangover, Star Wars, Avengers, … • Review: communication, problem solving, conflict resolution • Stages of groups/teams: • Forming, storming, norming, performing, adjourning
How to Facilitate a Good Group Experience • Start small, build on success • Address social aspect – ‘get to know you’ and team building activities • Teach how to give good feedback(praise/constructive criticism/next steps)
How to Facilitate a Good Group Experience • Class time for group work • Scaffolding assignments/activities • Roles and responsibilities are defined (& possibly rotated)
How to Facilitate a Good Group Experience • “Tips from Survivors” – info shared from past successful groups • Schedule critical thinking timeI think… I wonder… I suggest… • Prepare groups to fall apartReserve time, Have a process
How to Facilitate a Good Group Experience • Positive Interdependence “We all want to contribute something unique, have an important role, to be valued by others” (Frey) • Report, share, compare • Reciprocal teaching • Jigsaw approach – home group and expert group
Elements for a Good Group • Time interacting together • Resources (esp. intellectual) • Challenging task that becomes a common goal • Frequent feedback on individual and group performance
Assessing the People, Process and the Products of Group Work
What are you Assessing? • Process or Product? Or both? • What % of grade for each • What criteria will be used? • Who will apply the criteria? • Instructor and/or peers • How will grades be calculated?
Grading • One grade for the group • Two separate grades – 1 individual, 1 group • Only individual grades • How big a part of the final course grade • Not graded at all
Assessing the Process • Threaded online conversations or documents • Individual reflections, answers to questions • Portfolio with individual work identified • Criteria for assessing the process: • Attendance • Contributions (quantity and quality) • Time and task management
Peer Assessment • 57% include peer assessment • “Abandonment of instructional responsibility” (King) • Limited data on its effectiveness • Least effective tool for improving performance
Peer Assessment • Use to monitor the group, not grade it • For formative feedback • ‘How am I Doing’ Rubric (peer or self assessment) • Constructive and encourage improvement • A ‘firing’ option
Assessing the Group Project Experience • 3 Words on group work • First set based on previous group work • After the project, about this group experience • Post group debriefing • What worked, trouble spots, done differently • Self-reflection • On contribution, on product • Survey
Some final thoughts… • A lot of great advice from Problem/Project Based Learning also applies to group work. • Try turning an area you are struggling to teach into a group project. • Be sure to use regular (and maybe extra) evaluations of the instruction session to help document changes & to see if they are effective.
This PowerPoint and the bibliography are available on my web page: http://faculty.plattsburgh.edu/michelle.toth/